Suppr超能文献

马来西亚主流数据库中干细胞伦理的缺失:一项初步研究。

The Shortage of Malaysian Stem Cell Ethics in Mainstream Database: a Preliminary Study.

作者信息

Nishakanthi Gopalan

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Asian Bioeth Rev. 2019 Nov 28;11(4):437-460. doi: 10.1007/s41649-019-00102-5. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Ethics is a philosophical branch of inquiry that reasons between what is right and wrong. The moral philosophy of Socrates, Aristotle, and Plato from ancient Greek became the basis of most of the western ethics. These days, ethics can be divided based on its inquiries for example, normative, descriptive, metaethics, and applied ethics or based on its theories like utilitarianism, emotivism, and universal ethics. In context with applied ethics that examines issues involving emerging technologies, this study will look into the ethics of Malaysian stem cell technology based on written literature. It was mainly to identify Malaysian literature on stem cell ethics through conventional search since the mainstream international database indicated an obvious shortage. The critical review of this literature will facilitate in the understanding of unique position of Malaysia towards stem cell and its ethics in reference to the limited number. Despite the limitation, this can be a preliminary study urging for more inquiries and exploration to fulfil the multiple perspectives in ethics such as the diversity of Malaysian ethics, the impact of ethics in stem cell regulation in Malaysia, and if western contemporary ethics influences Malaysian ethics particularly involving stem cell technology.

摘要

伦理学是哲学的一个探究分支,研究对与错之间的推理。古希腊苏格拉底、亚里士多德和柏拉图的道德哲学成为了大多数西方伦理学的基础。如今,伦理学可以根据其探究内容进行划分,例如规范伦理学、描述伦理学、元伦理学和应用伦理学,或者根据其理论进行划分,如功利主义、情感主义和普遍伦理学。结合研究新兴技术相关问题的应用伦理学,本研究将基于书面文献探讨马来西亚干细胞技术的伦理问题。主要目的是通过传统检索确定马来西亚关于干细胞伦理的文献,因为主流国际数据库显示明显短缺。对这些文献的批判性综述将有助于理解马来西亚在干细胞及其伦理方面基于数量有限的独特立场。尽管存在局限性,但这可以作为一项初步研究,促使进行更多的探究和探索,以满足伦理学中的多种观点,如马来西亚伦理的多样性、伦理在马来西亚干细胞监管中的影响,以及西方当代伦理是否影响马来西亚伦理,特别是涉及干细胞技术的方面。

相似文献

3
Integrated empirical ethics: loss of normativity?整合性经验伦理学:规范性的丧失?
Med Health Care Philos. 2004;7(1):71-9. doi: 10.1023/b:mhep.0000021849.57115.eb.
5
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
6
'Medical ethics'--an alternative approach.《医学伦理学》——另一种方法。
J Med Ethics. 1986 Sep;12(3):145-50. doi: 10.1136/jme.12.3.145.
9
Medical ethics research between theory and practice.医学伦理学在理论与实践之间的研究。
Theor Med Bioeth. 1998 Jun;19(3):263-76. doi: 10.1023/a:1009965900818.

引用本文的文献

1
Capacity Building: Continuity and Change.能力建设:连续性与变革
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2019 Dec 12;11(4):341-342. doi: 10.1007/s41649-019-00108-z. eCollection 2019 Dec.

本文引用的文献

2
The status of the human embryo in various religions.人类胚胎在各种宗教中的地位。
Development. 2017 Jul 15;144(14):2541-2543. doi: 10.1242/dev.151886.
4
Human embryo research and the 14-day rule.人类胚胎研究与14天规则。
Development. 2017 Jun 1;144(11):1923-1925. doi: 10.1242/dev.151191.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验