• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

限制堕胎对儿童社会经济结果的长期影响。

The long-term impact of restricted access to abortion on children's socioeconomic outcomes.

机构信息

Institute for Sociology, Centre for Social Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.

Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 15;16(3):e0248638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248638. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0248638
PMID:33720972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7959378/
Abstract

We examine the long-term consequences of restricted access to abortion following a change in the Hungarian abortion law in 1974. Due to a change that restricted access to legal abortions, the number of induced abortions decreased from 169,650 to 102,022 between 1973 and 1974, whereas the number of live births increased from 156,224 to 186,288. We analyze the effects on the adult outcomes of the affected cohort of newborns (educational attainment, labor market participation, teen fertility). We use matched large-scale, individual-level administrative datasets of the Hungarian Central Statistical Office (population census 2011; live birth register), and we estimate the effects by comparing children born within a short timespan around the time the law change came into effect. We apply a difference-in-differences approach, building on the special rules of the new law that, despite the severe restriction, still made abortion permissible for selected groups of women. We control for the compositional change in the population of parents, rule out the effect of (unobserved) time trends and other potential behavioral responses to the law change, and draw causal inferences. We find that restricted access to abortion had, on average, a negative impact on the socioeconomic outcomes of the affected cohort of children. Children born after the law change have had worse educational outcomes, a greater likelihood of being unemployed at age 37, and a higher probability of being a teen parent.

摘要

我们研究了 1974 年匈牙利堕胎法变更后限制堕胎机会对长期后果的影响。由于一项限制合法堕胎机会的变更,1973 年至 1974 年间,人工流产数量从 169650 例降至 102022 例,而活产数量从 156224 例增至 186288 例。我们分析了受影响新生儿队列(教育程度、劳动力市场参与度、青少年生育率)的成人结果的影响。我们使用了匈牙利中央统计局的大规模、个人层面的行政数据集(2011 年人口普查;活产登记)进行分析,并通过比较该法律变更生效前后短期内出生的儿童来估计影响。我们采用了差异中的差异方法,该方法基于新法律的特殊规定,尽管限制严格,但仍允许某些特定群体的妇女进行堕胎。我们控制了父母群体的组成变化,排除了(未观察到的)时间趋势和其他可能对法律变更产生的行为反应的影响,并得出了因果推论。我们发现,限制堕胎机会平均对受影响儿童队列的社会经济结果产生了负面影响。法律变更后出生的儿童的教育成果较差,37 岁时失业的可能性更大,成为青少年父母的概率也更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55ed/7959378/d7c10867f7e1/pone.0248638.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55ed/7959378/6210455b9aee/pone.0248638.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55ed/7959378/d7c10867f7e1/pone.0248638.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55ed/7959378/6210455b9aee/pone.0248638.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55ed/7959378/d7c10867f7e1/pone.0248638.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The long-term impact of restricted access to abortion on children's socioeconomic outcomes.限制堕胎对儿童社会经济结果的长期影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 15;16(3):e0248638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248638. eCollection 2021.
2
Incidence of legal abortions and congenital abnormalities in Hungary.匈牙利合法堕胎和先天性异常的发生率。
Biomed Pharmacother. 1991;45(6):249-54. doi: 10.1016/0753-3322(91)90025-o.
3
The impact of abortion policy on prematurity in Hungary.匈牙利堕胎政策对早产的影响。
Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl. 1985;319:84-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1985.tb10116.x.
4
Induced abortions in Denmark.丹麦的人工流产情况。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1997;164:54-9.
5
Induced abortions and births. Changes in maternal age and parity in six counties, Norway, 1972-1981.人工流产与分娩。1972 - 1981年挪威六个县的孕产妇年龄和胎次变化。
Scand J Soc Med. 1988;16(2):115-9. doi: 10.1177/140349488801600210.
6
Population policies and reproductive patterns in Vietnam.越南的人口政策与生育模式
Lancet. 1996 Jun 1;347(9014):1529-32. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90676-5.
7
Influence of socioeconomic factors on attaining targets for reducing teenage pregnancies.社会经济因素对实现减少青少年怀孕目标的影响。
BMJ. 1993 May 8;306(6887):1232-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6887.1232.
8
Incidence of legal abortion in Sweden after the Chernobyl accident.切尔诺贝利事故后瑞典合法堕胎的发生率。
Biomed Pharmacother. 1991;45(6):225-8. doi: 10.1016/0753-3322(91)90021-k.
9
Characteristics of medical termination of pregnancy acceptors in Pondicherry State, 1972-1976.1972 - 1976年,本地治里邦人工流产受术者的特征。
Indian J Med Sci. 1981 Mar;35(3):43-6.
10
Induced abortion. Effects of marital status, age and parity on choice of pregnancy termination.人工流产。婚姻状况、年龄和胎次对终止妊娠选择的影响。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994 Mar;73(3):255-60. doi: 10.3109/00016349409023450.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of restrictive abortion laws on modern contraceptive use in Sub Saharan Africa.限制性堕胎法对撒哈拉以南非洲地区现代避孕措施使用的影响。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jul 10;5(7):e0004875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004875. eCollection 2025.
2
Decrease in reproductive desires among non-parent heterosexual women during the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland: the role of epidemiological stress, socioeconomic status, and reproductive rights.波兰新冠疫情期间非育异性恋女性生育意愿下降:流行病学压力、社会经济地位及生育权利的作用
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 5;13:1462215. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1462215. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Does Access to Family Planning Increase Children's Opportunities? Evidence from the War on Poverty and the Early Years of Title X.获得计划生育服务会增加儿童的机会吗?来自反贫困战争和第十章早期的证据。
J Hum Resour. 2019 Fall;54(4):825-856. doi: 10.3368/jhr.54.4.1216-8401R1. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
2
Fertility intentions and maternal health behaviour during and after pregnancy.生育意愿和怀孕中和怀孕后的母婴健康行为。
Popul Stud (Camb). 2020 Mar;74(1):55-74. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2019.1672881. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
3
Comparison of Health, Development, Maternal Bonding, and Poverty Among Children Born After Denial of Abortion vs After Pregnancies Subsequent to an Abortion.
The Medical and Financial Burden of Illegal Abortion.
非法堕胎的医疗和经济负担。
Cureus. 2022 Oct 20;14(10):e30514. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30514. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Is the Right to Abortion at Risk in Times of COVID-19? The Italian State of Affairs within the European Context.《COVID-19 时期的堕胎权是否受到威胁?意大利在欧洲背景下的状况》
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jun 12;57(6):615. doi: 10.3390/medicina57060615.
比较拒绝堕胎和堕胎后继续妊娠所生孩子的健康、发育、母婴关系和贫困情况。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Nov 1;172(11):1053-1060. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1785.
4
The impact of the legalisation of abortion on birth outcomes in Uruguay.乌拉圭堕胎合法化对生育结果的影响。
Health Econ. 2018 Jul;27(7):1103-1119. doi: 10.1002/hec.3659. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
5
Socioeconomic Outcomes of Women Who Receive and Women Who Are Denied Wanted Abortions in the United States.美国希望堕胎的妇女和被拒绝堕胎的妇女的社会经济结果。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Mar;108(3):407-413. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304247. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
6
Update on abortion policy.堕胎政策最新情况。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;28(6):517-521. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000324.
7
Pregnancy intentions, maternal behaviors, and infant health: investigating relationships with new measures and propensity score analysis.怀孕意愿、孕产妇行为与婴儿健康:采用新测量方法及倾向得分分析探究其间关系
Demography. 2015 Feb;52(1):83-111. doi: 10.1007/s13524-014-0359-9.
8
Season of Birth and Later Outcomes: Old Questions, New Answers.出生季节与后期结局:旧问题,新答案。
Rev Econ Stat. 2013 Jul 1;95(3):711-724. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00314.
9
Within-mother analysis of seasonal patterns in health at birth.母亲体内分析出生时健康的季节性模式。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jul 23;110(30):12265-70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1307582110. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
10
The impact of legalized abortion on child health outcomes and abandonment. Evidence from Romania.合法堕胎对儿童健康结果和遗弃的影响。来自罗马尼亚的证据。
J Health Econ. 2011 Dec;30(6):1219-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Aug 17.