• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用尖点在罗吉曲线比较各大陆 COVID-19 有效控制的在线时事件仪表板:观察性研究。

An online time-to-event dashboard comparing the effective control of COVID-19 among continents using the inflection point on an ogive curve: Observational study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology.

Department of Medical Research, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Mar 12;100(10):e24749. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024749.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000024749
PMID:33725830
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7969250/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the COVID-19 pandemic, one of the frequently asked questions is which countries (or continents) are severely hit. Aside from using the number of confirmed cases and the fatality to measure the impact caused by COVID-19, few adopted the inflection point (IP) to represent the control capability of COVID-19. How to determine the IP days related to the capability is still unclear. This study aims to (i) build a predictive model based on item response theory (IRT) to determine the IP for countries, and (ii) compare which countries (or continents) are hit most.

METHODS

We downloaded COVID-19 outbreak data of the number of confirmed cases in all countries as of October 19, 2020. The IRT-based predictive model was built to determine the pandemic IP for each country. A model building scheme was demonstrated to fit the number of cumulative infected cases. Model parameters were estimated using the Solver add-in tool in Microsoft Excel. The absolute advantage coefficient (AAC) was computed to track the IP at the minimum of incremental points on a given ogive curve. The time-to-event analysis (a.k.a. survival analysis) was performed to compare the difference in IPs among continents using the area under the curve (AUC) and the respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). An online comparative dashboard was created on Google Maps to present the epidemic prediction for each country.

RESULTS

The top 3 countries that were hit severely by COVID-19 were France, Malaysia, and Nepal, with IP days at 263, 262, and 262, respectively. The top 3 continents that were hit most based on IP days were Europe, South America, and North America, with their AUCs and 95% CIs at 0.73 (0.61-0.86), 0.58 (0.31-0.84), and 0.54 (0.44-0.64), respectively. An online time-event result was demonstrated and shown on Google Maps, comparing the IP probabilities across continents.

CONCLUSION

An IRT modeling scheme fitting the epidemic data was used to predict the length of IP days. Europe, particularly France, was hit seriously by COVID-19 based on the IP days. The IRT model incorporated with AAC is recommended to determine the pandemic IP.

摘要

背景

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,人们经常询问的一个问题是哪些国家(或大洲)受到了严重打击。除了使用确诊病例和死亡率来衡量 COVID-19 造成的影响外,很少有国家采用拐点(IP)来表示 COVID-19 的控制能力。如何确定与能力相关的 IP 天数仍不清楚。本研究旨在:(i)建立基于项目反应理论(IRT)的预测模型来确定国家的 IP;(ii)比较受打击最严重的国家(或大洲)。

方法

我们下载了截至 2020 年 10 月 19 日所有国家 COVID-19 确诊病例数的暴发数据。建立了基于 IRT 的预测模型来确定每个国家的大流行 IP。展示了一个模型构建方案来拟合累积感染病例数。使用 Microsoft Excel 中的 Solver 加载项估计模型参数。使用给定的概化曲线的最小增量点计算绝对优势系数(AAC)来跟踪 IP。使用曲线下面积(AUC)和各自的 95%置信区间(CI)对时间事件分析(又名生存分析)进行了比较,以比较不同大陆的 IP 差异。在 Google 地图上创建了一个在线比较仪表板,以展示每个国家的疫情预测。

结果

COVID-19 严重打击的前 3 个国家是法国、马来西亚和尼泊尔,其 IP 天数分别为 263、262 和 262。根据 IP 天数,受打击最严重的前 3 个大洲是欧洲、南美洲和北美洲,其 AUC 和 95%CI 分别为 0.73(0.61-0.86)、0.58(0.31-0.84)和 0.54(0.44-0.64)。演示并显示了一个在线时间事件结果,比较了各大洲的 IP 概率。

结论

使用拟合流行数据的 IRT 建模方案来预测 IP 天数的长度。根据 IP 天数,欧洲,特别是法国,受到 COVID-19 的严重打击。建议使用 IRT 模型和 AAC 来确定大流行的 IP。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d4a/7969250/8b7cc15959be/medi-100-e24749-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d4a/7969250/1addc1d305b7/medi-100-e24749-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d4a/7969250/fbb755c15181/medi-100-e24749-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d4a/7969250/d567f1ac19f4/medi-100-e24749-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d4a/7969250/5b9a4e4bf6de/medi-100-e24749-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d4a/7969250/66dda7adb476/medi-100-e24749-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d4a/7969250/7d7c816c5b2c/medi-100-e24749-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d4a/7969250/8b7cc15959be/medi-100-e24749-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d4a/7969250/1addc1d305b7/medi-100-e24749-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d4a/7969250/fbb755c15181/medi-100-e24749-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d4a/7969250/d567f1ac19f4/medi-100-e24749-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d4a/7969250/5b9a4e4bf6de/medi-100-e24749-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d4a/7969250/66dda7adb476/medi-100-e24749-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d4a/7969250/7d7c816c5b2c/medi-100-e24749-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d4a/7969250/8b7cc15959be/medi-100-e24749-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
An online time-to-event dashboard comparing the effective control of COVID-19 among continents using the inflection point on an ogive curve: Observational study.使用尖点在罗吉曲线比较各大陆 COVID-19 有效控制的在线时事件仪表板:观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Mar 12;100(10):e24749. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024749.
2
Using the IPcase Index with Inflection Points and the Corresponding Case Numbers to Identify the Impact Hit by COVID-19 in China: An Observation Study.使用带有拐点的 IPcase 指数和相应的病例编号来识别 COVID-19 在中国造成的影响:一项观察性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 18;18(4):1994. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041994.
3
Using the absolute advantage coefficient (AAC) to measure the strength of damage hit by COVID-19 in India on a growth-share matrix.利用绝对优势系数(AAC)在增长-份额矩阵上衡量新冠疫情对印度造成的损害程度。
Eur J Med Res. 2021 Jun 24;26(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40001-021-00528-4.
4
Using Social Network Analysis to Identify Spatiotemporal Spread Patterns of COVID-19 around the World: Online Dashboard Development.利用社交网络分析方法识别全球 COVID-19 时空传播模式:在线仪表板开发。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 3;18(5):2461. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052461.
5
Comparison of prediction accuracies between two mathematical models for the assessment of COVID-19 damage at the early stage and throughout 2020.比较两种数学模型在评估 COVID-19 早期和 2020 年全年损害方面的预测准确性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Aug 12;101(32):e29718. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029718.
6
The use of the time-to-event index (Tevent) to compare the negative impact of COVID-19 on public health among continents/regions in 2020 and 2021: An observational study.使用事件时间指数(Tevent)比较 2020 年和 2021 年各大陆/地区 COVID-19 对公共卫生的负面影响:一项观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Dec 9;101(49):e30249. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030249.
7
Visualizing the features of inflection point shown on a temporal bar graph using the data of COVID-19 pandemic.利用 COVID-19 大流行的数据,可视化时间条形图上的拐点特征。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Feb 4;101(5):e28749. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028749.
8
Geographic risk assessment of COVID-19 transmission using recent data: An observational study.利用近期数据进行新冠病毒传播的地理风险评估:一项观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 12;99(24):e20774. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020774.
9
Comparison of prediction accuracies between mathematical models to make projections of confirmed cases during the COVID-19 pandamic by country/region.比较各国/地区预测 COVID-19 大流行期间确诊病例的数学模型的预测精度。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 17;100(50):e28134. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028134.
10
Travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review.旅行相关的控制措施以遏制 COVID-19 大流行:快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 5;10:CD013717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013717.

引用本文的文献

1
Visualizing burst spots on research for four authors in MDPI journals named to be Citation Laureates 2021 using temporal bar graph.使用时间条形图可视化在 MDPI 期刊上发表研究的四位作者的突发点,这些期刊被命名为 2021 年引文桂冠奖。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Aug 11;102(32):e34578. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034578.
2
The 95% control lines on both confirmed cases and days of infection with COVID-19 were applied to compare the impact on public health between 2020 and 2021 using the hT-index.对 2020 年和 2021 年的新冠病毒感染确诊病例和感染天数的 95%置信区间控制线进行了对比,使用 hT 指数来评估对公共卫生的影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 May 19;102(20):e33570. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033570.
3
The ascendancy of research in acronyms related to COVID-19 displayed on a growth-share matrix (GSM): Bibliometric analysis.
COVID-19 相关缩略语研究的崛起在增长份额矩阵(GSM)上的表现:文献计量分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Apr 25;102(17):e33626. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033626.
4
A leading bibliometric author does not have a dominant contribution to research based on the CJAL score: Bibliometric analysis.一位领先的文献计量学作者在基于 CJAL 分数的研究中没有占主导地位的贡献:文献计量学分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jan 13;102(2):e32609. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032609.
5
The use of the time-to-event index (Tevent) to compare the negative impact of COVID-19 on public health among continents/regions in 2020 and 2021: An observational study.使用事件时间指数(Tevent)比较 2020 年和 2021 年各大陆/地区 COVID-19 对公共卫生的负面影响:一项观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Dec 9;101(49):e30249. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030249.
6
Comparison of prediction accuracies between two mathematical models for the assessment of COVID-19 damage at the early stage and throughout 2020.比较两种数学模型在评估 COVID-19 早期和 2020 年全年损害方面的预测准确性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Aug 12;101(32):e29718. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029718.
7
Suggestions to the article: demonstrating the ascendancy of COVID-19 research using acronyms.对该文章的建议:展示使用首字母缩略词的COVID-19研究的优势。
Scientometrics. 2022;127(5):2897-2899. doi: 10.1007/s11192-022-04302-z. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
8
Vaccination associated with gross domestic product and fewer deaths in countries and regions: A verification study.接种疫苗与国内生产总值和国家及地区死亡人数减少相关:验证研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jan 28;101(4):e28619. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028619.
9
Using the absolute advantage coefficient (AAC) to measure the strength of damage hit by COVID-19 in India on a growth-share matrix.利用绝对优势系数(AAC)在增长-份额矩阵上衡量新冠疫情对印度造成的损害程度。
Eur J Med Res. 2021 Jun 24;26(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40001-021-00528-4.
10
A Bibliometric Analysis on Dengue Outbreaks in Tropical and Sub-Tropical Climates Worldwide Since 1950.自 1950 年以来全球热带和亚热带气候登革热疫情的文献计量分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 19;18(6):3197. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063197.