• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用 COVID-19 大流行的数据,可视化时间条形图上的拐点特征。

Visualizing the features of inflection point shown on a temporal bar graph using the data of COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.

Department of Medical Research, Chiali Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Feb 4;101(5):e28749. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028749.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000028749
PMID:35119031
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8812627/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Exponential-like infection growth leading to peaks (denoted by inflection points [IP] or turning points) is usually the hallmark of infectious disease outbreaks, including coronaviruses. To determine the IPs of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), we applied the item response theory model to detect phase transitions for each country/region and characterize the IP feature on the temporal bar graph (TBG).

METHODS

The IP (using the item difficulty parameter to locate) was verified by the differential equation in calculus and interpreted by the TBG with 2 virtual and real empirical data (i.e., from Collatz conjecture and COVID-19 pandemic in 2020). Comparisons of IPs, R2, and burst strength [BS = ln() denoted by the infection number at IP(Nip) and the item slope parameter(a) in item response theory were made for countries/regions and continents on the choropleth map and the forest plot.

RESULTS

We found that the evolution of COVID-19 on the TBG makes the data clear and easy to understand, the shorter IP (=53.9) was in China and the longest (=247.3) was in Europe, and the highest R2 (as the variance explained by the model) was in the US, with a mean R2 of 0.98. We successfully estimated the IPs for countries/regions on COVID-19 in 2020 and presented them on the TBG.

CONCLUSION

Temporal visualization is recommended for researchers in future relevant studies (e.g., the evolution of keywords in a specific discipline) and is not merely limited to the IP search in COVID-19 pandemics as we did in this study.

摘要

背景

呈指数增长的感染增长导致峰值(由拐点[IP]或转折点表示)通常是传染病爆发的标志,包括冠状病毒。为了确定新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)的 IP,我们应用项目反应理论模型来检测每个国家/地区的相变,并在时间条形图(TBG)上描述 IP 特征。

方法

通过微积分中的微分方程验证 IP(使用项目难度参数定位),并通过具有 2 个虚拟和真实经验数据(即,来自 Collatz 猜想和 2020 年 COVID-19 大流行)的 TBG 进行解释。对国家/地区和大陆的 IP、R2 和爆发强度[BS=ln()]进行比较(以 IP 处的感染数量 Nip 和项目响应理论中的项目斜率参数(a)表示)在专题地图和森林图上。

结果

我们发现,COVID-19 在 TBG 上的演变使数据清晰易懂,中国的 IP 最短(=53.9),欧洲的最长(=247.3),美国的 R2 最高(表示模型解释的方差),平均 R2 为 0.98。我们成功估计了 2020 年 COVID-19 国家/地区的 IP,并在 TBG 上呈现了这些 IP。

结论

建议未来相关研究的研究人员进行时间可视化(例如,特定学科中关键词的演变),而不仅仅限于我们在这项研究中对 COVID-19 大流行中的 IP 搜索。

相似文献

1
Visualizing the features of inflection point shown on a temporal bar graph using the data of COVID-19 pandemic.利用 COVID-19 大流行的数据,可视化时间条形图上的拐点特征。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Feb 4;101(5):e28749. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028749.
2
An online time-to-event dashboard comparing the effective control of COVID-19 among continents using the inflection point on an ogive curve: Observational study.使用尖点在罗吉曲线比较各大陆 COVID-19 有效控制的在线时事件仪表板:观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Mar 12;100(10):e24749. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024749.
3
Comparison of prediction accuracies between two mathematical models for the assessment of COVID-19 damage at the early stage and throughout 2020.比较两种数学模型在评估 COVID-19 早期和 2020 年全年损害方面的预测准确性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Aug 12;101(32):e29718. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029718.
4
Visualizing burst spots on research for four authors in MDPI journals named to be Citation Laureates 2021 using temporal bar graph.使用时间条形图可视化在 MDPI 期刊上发表研究的四位作者的突发点,这些期刊被命名为 2021 年引文桂冠奖。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Aug 11;102(32):e34578. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034578.
5
Using Social Network Analysis to Identify Spatiotemporal Spread Patterns of COVID-19 around the World: Online Dashboard Development.利用社交网络分析方法识别全球 COVID-19 时空传播模式:在线仪表板开发。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 3;18(5):2461. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052461.
6
Using the IPcase Index with Inflection Points and the Corresponding Case Numbers to Identify the Impact Hit by COVID-19 in China: An Observation Study.使用带有拐点的 IPcase 指数和相应的病例编号来识别 COVID-19 在中国造成的影响:一项观察性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 18;18(4):1994. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041994.
7
Suggestions to the article: demonstrating the ascendancy of COVID-19 research using acronyms.对该文章的建议:展示使用首字母缩略词的COVID-19研究的优势。
Scientometrics. 2022;127(5):2897-2899. doi: 10.1007/s11192-022-04302-z. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
8
Alternative graphical displays for the monitoring of epidemic outbreaks, with application to COVID-19 mortality.用于监测传染病暴发的替代图形显示,应用于 COVID-19 死亡率。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Oct 6;20(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01122-8.
9
Comparison of prediction accuracies between mathematical models to make projections of confirmed cases during the COVID-19 pandamic by country/region.比较各国/地区预测 COVID-19 大流行期间确诊病例的数学模型的预测精度。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 17;100(50):e28134. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028134.
10
The use of the time-to-event index (Tevent) to compare the negative impact of COVID-19 on public health among continents/regions in 2020 and 2021: An observational study.使用事件时间指数(Tevent)比较 2020 年和 2021 年各大陆/地区 COVID-19 对公共卫生的负面影响:一项观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Dec 9;101(49):e30249. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030249.

引用本文的文献

1
Analyzing shifts in age-related macular degeneration research trends since 2014: A bibliometric study with triple-map Sankey diagrams (TMSD).分析 2014 年以来年龄相关性黄斑变性研究趋势的转变:基于三重映射 Sankey 图(TMSD)的文献计量研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jan 19;103(3):e36547. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036547.
2
Trends and hotspots related to traditional and modern approaches on acupuncture for stroke: A bibliometric and visualization analysis.针灸治疗中风的传统与现代方法的趋势和热点:文献计量学和可视化分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 1;102(48):e35332. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035332.
3
Visualizing burst spots on research for four authors in MDPI journals named to be Citation Laureates 2021 using temporal bar graph.
使用时间条形图可视化在 MDPI 期刊上发表研究的四位作者的突发点,这些期刊被命名为 2021 年引文桂冠奖。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Aug 11;102(32):e34578. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034578.
4
The 95% control lines on both confirmed cases and days of infection with COVID-19 were applied to compare the impact on public health between 2020 and 2021 using the hT-index.对 2020 年和 2021 年的新冠病毒感染确诊病例和感染天数的 95%置信区间控制线进行了对比,使用 hT 指数来评估对公共卫生的影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 May 19;102(20):e33570. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033570.
5
The ascendancy of research in acronyms related to COVID-19 displayed on a growth-share matrix (GSM): Bibliometric analysis.COVID-19 相关缩略语研究的崛起在增长份额矩阵(GSM)上的表现:文献计量分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Apr 25;102(17):e33626. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033626.
6
Analysis of citation trends to identify articles on delirium worth reading using DDPP model with temporal heatmaps (THM): A bibliometric analysis.基于 DDPP 模型的时间热图(THM)分析引用趋势,以识别值得阅读的谵妄相关文章:一项文献计量学分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Feb 22;102(8):e32955. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032955.
7
The use of the time-to-event index (Tevent) to compare the negative impact of COVID-19 on public health among continents/regions in 2020 and 2021: An observational study.使用事件时间指数(Tevent)比较 2020 年和 2021 年各大陆/地区 COVID-19 对公共卫生的负面影响:一项观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Dec 9;101(49):e30249. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030249.
8
Using the Sankey diagram to visualize article features on the topics of whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) since 2012: Bibliometric analysis.运用桑基图可视化 2012 年以来全外显子组测序(WES)和全基因组测序(WGS)主题的文章特征:文献计量分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 23;101(38):e30682. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030682.
9
Comparison of prediction accuracies between two mathematical models for the assessment of COVID-19 damage at the early stage and throughout 2020.比较两种数学模型在评估 COVID-19 早期和 2020 年全年损害方面的预测准确性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Aug 12;101(32):e29718. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029718.