Comparative Medicine Institute, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intracellular Pathogens Research Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2021 Jun;21(6):413-421. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2020.2729. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
Recently, infections with emerging zoonotic bacteria of the genus have been reported in association with a range of central nervous system (CNS) symptoms. Currently, it remains unknown if spp. infection is associated with symptoms of schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder (SCZ/SAD). The objective of this study was to determine if there is an association between species infection and SCZ/SAD. A secondary objective was to determine if SCZ/SAD symptoms were more severe among participants with documented spp. infection. Using a case-control study design, 17 cases and 13 controls were evaluated with a series of clinical and cognitive assessments. Blood samples were collected and tested for spp. infection using serological, microbiological, and molecular techniques. People with SCZ/SAD were more likely than healthy volunteers to have spp. DNA in their bloodstream, with 11 of 17 cases (65%) positive by spp. droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). In comparison, only one healthy volunteer was spp. ddPCR positive (8%, = 0.0024). Based on serology, spp. exposure was common among people with SCZ/SAD (12 of 17) as well as among healthy volunteers (12 of 13), with no significant difference between the groups ( = 0.196). Within the case group of people with SCZ/SAD, there was no significant difference in SCZ/SAD severity scores between people with and without ddPCR evidence of spp. infection. This pilot study provides preliminary evidence in support of future investigations that should examine a potential contribution of spp. infection to SCZ/SAD.
最近,与一系列中枢神经系统(CNS)症状相关的新兴人畜共患菌属感染已被报道。目前,尚不清楚 spp.感染是否与精神分裂症/分裂情感障碍(SCZ/SAD)的症状有关。本研究的目的是确定 spp.感染是否与 SCZ/SAD 之间存在关联。次要目标是确定在有记录的 spp.感染的参与者中,SCZ/SAD 症状是否更严重。本研究采用病例对照研究设计,对 17 例病例和 13 例对照进行了一系列临床和认知评估。采集血样并使用血清学、微生物学和分子技术检测 spp.感染。与健康志愿者相比,SCZ/SAD 患者的血液中更有可能存在 spp. DNA,17 例病例中有 11 例(65%)通过 spp.液滴数字 PCR(ddPCR)呈阳性。相比之下,只有 1 例健康志愿者 spp. ddPCR 呈阳性(8%,=0.0024)。基于血清学,SCZ/SAD 患者(17 例中有 12 例)和健康志愿者(13 例中有 12 例)中 spp.暴露都很常见,两组之间没有显著差异(=0.196)。在 SCZ/SAD 病例组中,ddPCR 证据表明 spp.感染的患者与无感染证据的患者之间的 SCZ/SAD 严重程度评分无显著差异。这项初步研究提供了初步证据,支持未来应进一步研究 spp.感染是否与 SCZ/SAD 有关。