Department of Medicine and Quality, Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Department of Pathology, Cambridge Health Alliance Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Pathog Glob Health. 2021 Jul;115(5):331-334. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2021.1901041. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence among health-care workers (HCW) can assess past exposure and possible immunity, which varies across different regions, populations and times. We investigated the seroprevalence among HCW in Massachusetts (a region suffering high COVID-19 mortality) at the end of first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. All HCW at Cambridge Health Alliance were invited to participate in this cross-sectional survey in June 2020. Those who volunteered, consented and provided a blood sample were included. Dried blood specimens from finger-prick sampling collected either at home by each HCW or onsite by the study team were analyzed for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG to the virus' receptor binding domain, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. IgM and IgG antibody abundance were categorized based on the number of standard deviations above the cross-reacting levels found in existing, pre-pandemic blood samples previously obtained by the Ragon Institute and analyzed by the Broad Institute (Cambridge, MA). Seroprevalence estimates were made based on 'positive' IgM or IgG using 'low' (>6 SD), 'medium' (>4.5 SD), and 'high' prevalence cutoffs (>3 SD).A total of 433 out of 5,204 eligible HCWs consented and provided samples. Participating HCWs had a lower cumulative incidence (from the start of the pandemic up to the bloodspot collections) of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positivity (1.85%) compared to non-participants (3.29%). The low, medium, and high seroprevalence estimates were 8.1%, 11.3%, and 14.5%, respectively. The weighted estimates based on past PCR positivity were 13.9%, 19.4%, and 24.9%, respectively, for the entire healthcare system population after accounting for participation bias.
SARS-CoV-2 抗体血清阳性率在医护人员(HCW)中可以评估过去的暴露情况和可能的免疫情况,这在不同地区、人群和时间有所不同。我们调查了马萨诸塞州(COVID-19 死亡率高的地区)第一波 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间 HCW 的血清阳性率。剑桥健康联盟的所有 HCW 都被邀请参加 2020 年 6 月的这项横断面调查。自愿参加、同意并提供血液样本的 HCW 被纳入研究。使用酶联免疫吸附试验,对来自手指刺取的干血斑样本进行 SARS-CoV-2 受体结合域 IgM 和 IgG 分析。根据 Ragon 研究所之前获得并由 Broad 研究所(马萨诸塞州剑桥)分析的、存在于先前大流行血液样本中的交叉反应水平的标准偏差数,对 IgM 和 IgG 抗体丰度进行分类。根据 IgM 或 IgG 的“阳性”使用“低”(>6 SD)、“中”(>4.5 SD)和“高”(>3 SD)流行率切点来计算血清阳性率估计值。共有 5204 名符合条件的 HCW 中的 433 名同意并提供了样本。与非参与者相比,参与者的 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 阳性率(1.85%)累积发生率(从大流行开始到采集血斑时)较低。低、中、高血清阳性率估计值分别为 8.1%、11.3%和 14.5%。在考虑参与偏倚后,整个医疗保健系统人群的加权估计值分别为过去 PCR 阳性的 13.9%、19.4%和 24.9%。