Menachemi Nir, Dixon Brian E, Wools-Kaloustian Kara K, Yiannoutsos Constantin T, Halverson Paul K
Department of Health Policy and Management (Dr Menachemi) and Department of Epidemiology (Dr Dixon), Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health and Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana (Dr Wools-Kaloustian); and Department of Biostatistics (Dr Yiannoutsos) and Department of Health Policy and Management (Dr Halverson), Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021;27(3):246-250. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001331.
Existing hospitalization ratios for COVID-19 typically use case counts in the denominator, which problematically underestimates total infections because asymptomatic and mildly infected persons rarely get tested. As a result, surge models that rely on case counts to forecast hospital demand may be inaccurately influencing policy and decision-maker action.
Based on SARS-CoV-2 prevalence data derived from a statewide random sample (as opposed to relying on reported case counts), we determine the infection-hospitalization ratio (IHR), defined as the percentage of infected individuals who are hospitalized, for various demographic groups in Indiana. Furthermore, for comparison, we show the extent to which case-based hospitalization ratios, compared with the IHR, overestimate the probability of hospitalization by demographic group.
Secondary analysis of statewide prevalence data from Indiana, COVID-19 hospitalization data extracted from a statewide health information exchange, and all reported COVID-19 cases to the state health department.
State of Indiana as of April 30, 2020.
Demographic-stratified IHRs and case-hospitalization ratios.
The overall IHR was 2.1% and varied more by age than by race or sex. Infection-hospitalization ratio estimates ranged from 0.4% for those younger than 40 years to 9.2% for those older than 60 years. Hospitalization rates based on case counts overestimated the IHR by a factor of 10, but this overestimation differed by demographic groups, especially age.
In this first study of the IHR based on population prevalence, our results can improve forecasting models of hospital demand-especially in preparation for the upcoming winter period when an increase in SARS CoV-2 infections is expected.
现有的新冠肺炎住院率通常以病例数作为分母,这存在问题,因为无症状感染者和轻症感染者很少接受检测,从而低估了总感染人数。因此,依赖病例数来预测医院需求的激增模型可能会对政策和决策者的行动产生不准确的影响。
基于从全州随机样本中得出的新冠病毒流行率数据(而非依赖报告的病例数),我们确定了印第安纳州不同人口群体的感染住院率(IHR),即住院的感染个体的百分比。此外,为作比较,我们展示了基于病例的住院率与感染住院率相比,在各人口群体中高估住院概率的程度。
对印第安纳州全州流行率数据、从全州健康信息交换中提取的新冠肺炎住院数据以及向州卫生部门报告的所有新冠肺炎病例进行二次分析。
截至2020年4月30日的印第安纳州。
按人口统计学分层的感染住院率和病例住院率。
总体感染住院率为2.1%,因年龄的差异大于种族或性别的差异。感染住院率估计值范围为:40岁以下人群为0.4%,60岁以上人群为9.2%。基于病例数的住院率高估感染住院率达10倍,但这种高估在不同人口群体中有所不同,尤其是年龄组。
在这项基于人群流行率的感染住院率的首次研究中,我们的结果可以改进医院需求预测模型,尤其是在为预计新冠病毒感染增加的即将到来的冬季做准备时。