Suppr超能文献

视障人士的生物反馈刺激:文献系统评价。

Biofeedback stimulation in the visually impaired: a systematic review of literature.

机构信息

National Centre of Services and Research for the Prevention of Blindness and Rehabilitation of Visually Impaired, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre, International Agency for Prevention of Blindness- Italia Onlus, Rome, Italy.

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021 Mar;41(2):342-364. doi: 10.1111/opo.12787.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is estimated that approximately 1.3 billion people live with some form of distance or near visual impairment. Numerous studies have been carried out to evaluate the effects of biofeedback (BF) and establish if it could be a useful tool in vision rehabilitation for various eye diseases.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed: 1) to examine the current evidence of BF efficacy for the rehabilitation of the visually impaired and 2) to describe methodological variations used in previous BF studies to provide recommendations for vision rehabilitation interventions.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in the Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases to collect documents published between January 2000 and May 2020. Of the 1,960 studies identified, 43 met the criteria for inclusion. The following information was collected from each study: sample size, control group, any eye disease, apparatus used, frequency and number of sessions of BF, main outcomes of training and whether a follow-up was conducted. The first group included studies published as scientific articles in peer-reviewed journals. The second group included abstracts of studies presented at peer-reviewed conferences. Publications were also grouped according to the eye disease treated.

RESULTS

25 articles and 18 peer-reviewed conference abstracts (PRCAs) were included in this review. BF stimulation is a commonly used technique for the treatment of visual impairment caused by macular disease. Most BF studies evaluate the effect of training on the preferred retinal locus (PRL), particularly with regard to fixation location and stability. Across these studies, participants who received BF intervention improved fixation stability and reading speed. High variability in the number of sessions and the duration of BF training was found. Most studies did not use a control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this review present evidence for biofeedback treatment in vision rehabilitation, with improved oculomotor abilities. Currently, it is not possible to formulate evidence-based recommendations for a standard training procedure due to the poor quality of existing randomised controlled trials. High-quality studies are needed to develop standard protocols for a range of eye diseases.

摘要

背景

据估计,约有 13 亿人存在某种形式的远距离或近距离视力障碍。已经进行了许多研究来评估生物反馈(BF)的效果,并确定它是否可以成为各种眼部疾病视力康复的有用工具。

目的

本系统评价旨在:1)检查 BF 对视力障碍康复的疗效的现有证据,2)描述以前 BF 研究中使用的方法学差异,为视力康复干预提供建议。

方法

在 Medline、PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 数据库中进行了系统评价,以收集 2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 5 月期间发表的文献。在确定的 1960 项研究中,有 43 项符合纳入标准。从每项研究中收集以下信息:样本量、对照组、任何眼部疾病、使用的仪器、BF 治疗的频率和次数、训练的主要结果以及是否进行了随访。第一组包括发表在同行评议期刊上的科学文章。第二组包括在同行评议会议上提交的研究摘要。出版物还根据治疗的眼部疾病进行了分类。

结果

本综述包括 25 篇文章和 18 篇同行评议会议摘要(PRCA)。BF 刺激是治疗由黄斑疾病引起的视力障碍的常用技术。大多数 BF 研究评估了训练对首选视网膜位置(PRL)的影响,特别是在注视位置和稳定性方面。在这些研究中,接受 BF 干预的参与者改善了注视稳定性和阅读速度。BF 训练的次数和持续时间存在很大差异。大多数研究没有使用对照组。

结论

本综述的结果提供了 BF 治疗在视力康复中的证据,表明眼动能力得到了改善。由于现有的随机对照试验质量较差,目前无法制定基于证据的标准训练程序建议。需要高质量的研究来为一系列眼部疾病制定标准方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验