• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对 COVID-19 时代的数字逆向护理规律:数字技术加剧或缓解健康不平等的潜力。

Addressing the Digital Inverse Care Law in the Time of COVID-19: Potential for Digital Technology to Exacerbate or Mitigate Health Inequalities.

机构信息

Research and Evaluation Division, Public Health Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

Kings Fund, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 7;23(4):e21726. doi: 10.2196/21726.

DOI:10.2196/21726
PMID:33735096
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8030655/
Abstract

Digital technologies have been transforming methods of health care delivery and have been embraced within the health, social, and public response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, this has directed attention to the "inverse information law" (also called "digital inverse care law") and digital inequalities, as people who are most in need of support (in particular, older people and those experiencing social deprivation) are often least likely to engage with digital platforms. The response to the COVID-19 pandemic represents a sustained shift to the adoption of digital approaches to working and engaging with populations, which will continue beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, it is important to understand the underlying factors contributing to digital inequalities and act immediately to avoid digital inequality contributing to health inequalities in the future. The response to COVID-19 represents a sustained shift to adopting digital approaches to working and engaging with populations which will continue beyond this pandemic. Therefore it is important that we understand the underlying factors contributing to digital inequalities, and act now to protect against digital inequality contributing to health inequalities in the future.

摘要

数字技术改变了医疗保健的提供方式,并在应对 COVID-19 大流行的卫生、社会和公共反应中得到了采用。然而,这引起了对“逆向信息法”(也称为“数字逆向护理法”)和数字不平等的关注,因为最需要支持的人(特别是老年人和遭受社会剥夺的人)往往最不可能使用数字平台。对 COVID-19 大流行的反应代表了向采用数字方法来开展工作和与人群互动的持续转变,这种转变将在 COVID-19 大流行之后继续下去。因此,了解导致数字不平等的潜在因素并立即采取行动以避免数字不平等导致未来健康不平等至关重要。对 COVID-19 的反应代表了向采用数字方法来开展工作和与人群互动的持续转变,这种转变将在这场大流行之后继续下去。因此,我们必须了解导致数字不平等的潜在因素,并立即采取行动,防止数字不平等导致未来的健康不平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7edf/8030655/c45e724bea5e/jmir_v23i4e21726_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7edf/8030655/c45e724bea5e/jmir_v23i4e21726_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7edf/8030655/c45e724bea5e/jmir_v23i4e21726_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Addressing the Digital Inverse Care Law in the Time of COVID-19: Potential for Digital Technology to Exacerbate or Mitigate Health Inequalities.应对 COVID-19 时代的数字逆向护理规律:数字技术加剧或缓解健康不平等的潜力。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 7;23(4):e21726. doi: 10.2196/21726.
2
Digital Health Tools for Managing Noncommunicable Diseases During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives of Patients and Caregivers.数字健康工具在 COVID-19 大流行期间和之后用于管理非传染性疾病:患者和照护者的观点。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 29;23(1):e25652. doi: 10.2196/25652.
3
The digital divide: amplifying health inequalities for people with severe mental illness in the time of COVID-19.数字鸿沟:在 COVID-19 时代加剧严重精神疾病患者的健康不平等。
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;219(4):529-531. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2021.56.
4
Implications of telehealth and digital care solutions during COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative literature review.新冠疫情期间远程医疗和数字护理解决方案的影响:定性文献综述。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2021 Mar 2;46(1):68-83. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2020.1839467. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
5
Digital Orientation of Health Systems in the Post-COVID-19 "New Normal" in the United States: Cross-sectional Survey.美国后 COVID-19“新常态”下的卫生系统数字化定位:横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 16;23(8):e30453. doi: 10.2196/30453.
6
Digital health technologies and inequalities: A scoping review of potential impacts and policy recommendations.数字健康技术与不平等:潜在影响与政策建议的范围综述。
Health Policy. 2024 Aug;146:105122. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105122. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
7
Digital health technology for remote care in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.数字健康技术在应对 COVID-19 大流行中的远程护理应用:范围综述。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021 Apr;25(8):3386-3394. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202104_25751.
8
Digital Inequality During a Pandemic: Quantitative Study of Differences in COVID-19-Related Internet Uses and Outcomes Among the General Population.大流行期间的数字不平等:普通人群中与COVID-19相关的互联网使用情况及结果差异的定量研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 20;22(8):e20073. doi: 10.2196/20073.
9
Harnessing Digital Health Technologies During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Context Matters.在新冠疫情期间及之后利用数字健康技术:背景很重要。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 30;22(12):e21815. doi: 10.2196/21815.
10
Facing the digital divide into a dementia clinic during COVID-19 pandemic: caregiver age matters.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,数字鸿沟进入痴呆症诊所:看护者年龄很重要。
Neurol Sci. 2021 Apr;42(4):1247-1251. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-05009-w. Epub 2021 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
How digital health risks recreating the isolation it aims to solve for people with serious mental illness.数字健康如何有可能重现它旨在为严重精神疾病患者解决的那种孤立状态。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 26;12:1620156. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1620156. eCollection 2025.
2
European digital transformation for Roma girls' health: the case of Spain.欧洲罗姆女孩健康领域的数字转型:以西班牙为例。
Front Sociol. 2025 Jul 22;10:1562088. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1562088. eCollection 2025.
3
Incorporating digital health into organizational health literacy: An updated definition, tools, and recommendations.

本文引用的文献

1
Coronavirus contact-tracing apps: can they slow the spread of COVID-19?冠状病毒接触者追踪应用程序:它们能减缓新冠病毒的传播吗?
Nature. 2020 May 19. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01514-2.
2
Impact of the digital divide in the age of COVID-19.新冠疫情时代数字鸿沟的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(7):1147-1148. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa078.
3
Why health promotion matters to the COVID-19 pandemic, and vice versa.为什么健康促进对新冠疫情至关重要,反之亦然。
将数字健康纳入组织健康素养:最新定义、工具及建议。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2025 Jul 8;38(5):8404704251356518. doi: 10.1177/08404704251356518.
4
"I'm a paper and pencil person": a qualitative descriptive study of potential barriers and facilitators to engagement with pre-operative total knee replacement education and prehabilitation digital interventions.“我是个喜欢纸笔的人”:一项关于术前全膝关节置换教育和术前康复数字干预参与度潜在障碍与促进因素的定性描述性研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 4;26(1):652. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08673-1.
5
Applying a diffusion of innovations framework to characterise diffusion groups and more effectively reach late adopters: a cross-sectional study on COVID-19 vaccinations in Canada in late 2021.应用创新扩散框架来界定扩散群体并更有效地覆盖晚期采用者:2021年末加拿大新冠疫苗接种的横断面研究
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Jan 16;3(1):e000926. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-000926. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
Engagement With Digital Health Technologies Among Older People Living in Socially Deprived Areas: Qualitative Study of Influencing Factors.社会贫困地区老年人对数字健康技术的参与:影响因素的定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 26;8:e60483. doi: 10.2196/60483.
7
The Impact and Wider Implications of Remote Consultations for General Practice in Norway: Qualitative Study Among Norwegian Contract General Practitioners.挪威全科医疗远程会诊的影响及更广泛影响:挪威签约全科医生的定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 17;8:e63068. doi: 10.2196/63068.
8
To What Extent Can Digital Health Technologies Comply With the Principles of Responsible Innovation? Practice-and Policy-Oriented Research Insights Regarding an Organisational and Systemic Issue.数字健康技术在多大程度上能够符合负责任创新的原则?关于一个组织性和系统性问题的实践与政策导向型研究见解。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8061. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8061. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
9
Optimising digital clinical consultations in maternity care: a realist review and implementation principles.优化产科医疗中的数字临床咨询:一个现实主义的回顾和实施原则。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 1;14(10):e079153. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079153.
10
Sociodemographic factors and health digital divide among urban residents: Evidence from a population-based survey in China.城市居民的社会人口学因素与健康数字鸿沟:来自中国一项基于人群的调查的证据。
Digit Health. 2024 Aug 6;10:20552076241271812. doi: 10.1177/20552076241271812. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
Health Promot Int. 2020 Apr 1;35(2):181-186. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa042.
4
Video consultations for covid-19.针对新冠肺炎的视频问诊
BMJ. 2020 Mar 12;368:m998. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m998.
5
Health equity in England: the Marmot review 10 years on.英国的健康公平:十年后的《马尔莫特审查报告》
BMJ. 2020 Feb 24;368:m693. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m693.
6
What is quality in assisted living technology? The ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services.辅助生活技术中的质量是什么?用于有效远程医疗和远程护理服务的ARCHIE框架。
BMC Med. 2015 Apr 23;13:91. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0279-6.
7
Digital health interventions: widening access or widening inequalities?数字健康干预措施:是扩大了可及性还是加剧了不平等?
Public Health. 2014 Dec;128(12):1118-20. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
8
The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions.行为改变轮:一种描述和设计行为改变干预措施的新方法。
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
9
Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care--an interactive sociotechnical analysis.医疗保健中信息技术的意外后果——一项交互式社会技术分析
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):542-9. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2384. Epub 2007 Jun 28.
10
eHEALS: The eHealth Literacy Scale.eHEALS:电子健康素养量表。
J Med Internet Res. 2006 Nov 14;8(4):e27. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.4.e27.