Department of Physical Education, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, China.
Department of Orthopedics, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China.
Int J Sports Med. 2021 Jun;42(7):577-587. doi: 10.1055/a-1386-4846. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
In this meta-analysis, the aims were to examine the effects of resistance training with and without blood flow restriction on vascular function. Five databases were searched up to June 2020 for papers about resistance training with blood flow restriction influence on vascular function. The quality of each identified study was evaluated. Effect sizes were estimated in terms of the standardized mean difference. A subgroup analysis was conducted according to participants' age, training duration, and cuff pressure. The results of six studies on arterial compliance and five on vascular function were highly homogenous regarding responses to resistance training with or without blood flow restriction. Resistance training with blood flow restriction had a more positive effect for regulating arterial compliance than resistance training without blood flow restriction, but not for vascular function. Resistance training with blood flow restriction leads to a more positive effect on vascular function than resistance training when training for no longer than four weeks.
在这项荟萃分析中，目的是研究有无血流限制的抗阻训练对血管功能的影响。截至 2020 年 6 月，我们在五个数据库中检索了有关血流限制对血管功能影响的抗阻训练的论文。评估了每个确定研究的质量。根据参与者的年龄、训练持续时间和袖带压力，以标准化均数差来估计效应大小。根据有无血流限制的抗阻训练的反应，对 6 项关于动脉顺应性和 5 项关于血管功能的研究进行了亚组分析。结果表明，在调节动脉顺应性方面，血流限制抗阻训练的效果优于无血流限制抗阻训练，但对血管功能没有影响。血流限制抗阻训练的效果优于无血流限制抗阻训练，尤其是在四周以内的训练中。
