• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

碳交易市场对中国城市协调发展的影响。

The impact of the carbon trading market on urban coordinated development in China.

作者信息

Wang Dan, Sun Mili

机构信息

School of Management, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, 201620, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Mar;31(13):20093-20116. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32428-5. Epub 2024 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-024-32428-5
PMID:38374499
Abstract

Evaluating the effects of China's carbon emission trading scheme (ETS) is crucial for the coordinated development of Chinese cities. Therefore, based on the panel data of 242 cities in China from 2008 to 2019, this paper uses the multi-period difference-in-difference (DID) model to comprehensively evaluate the impact of carbon market on the coordinated development of cities from the perspectives of carbon market policy and carbon market efficiency, and then analyzes the mechanism and heterogeneity of the effect of carbon market efficiency. The results show that both carbon market policy and carbon market efficiency can promote the coordinated development of cities. Science and education expenditure plays a significant intermediary role in the impact of carbon market efficiency on the coordinated development of cities. The heterogeneity test finds that the stricter the performance penalty system, the higher the level of urban coordinated development, and the stronger the effect of carbon market efficiency. The findings of this paper provide policy recommendations for further improving the construction of China's pilot and national ETS and enhancing the coordinated development of Chinese cities.

摘要

评估中国碳排放交易体系(ETS)的效果对中国城市的协调发展至关重要。因此,基于2008年至2019年中国242个城市的面板数据,本文运用多期双重差分(DID)模型,从碳市场政策和碳市场效率两个角度全面评估碳市场对城市协调发展的影响,进而分析碳市场效率影响的机制和异质性。结果表明,碳市场政策和碳市场效率均能促进城市的协调发展。科教支出在碳市场效率对城市协调发展的影响中发挥着显著的中介作用。异质性检验发现,绩效惩罚制度越严格,城市协调发展水平越高,碳市场效率的作用效果越强。本文的研究结果为进一步完善中国试点和全国碳排放交易体系建设、促进中国城市协调发展提供了政策建议。

相似文献

1
The impact of the carbon trading market on urban coordinated development in China.碳交易市场对中国城市协调发展的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Mar;31(13):20093-20116. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32428-5. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
2
Impact on Carbon Intensity of Carbon Emission Trading-Evidence from a Pilot Program in 281 Cities in China.中国 281 个城市碳交易试点对碳强度的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 30;19(19):12483. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912483.
3
Does emission trading system improve the urban land green use efficiency? Empirical evidence from Chinese cities.排放交易系统是否能提高城市土地绿色利用效率?来自中国城市的实证证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Dec;30(58):121666-121683. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30678-3. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
4
Does the low carbon transition impact urban resilience? Evidence from China's pilot cities for carbon emission trading.低碳转型是否会影响城市韧性?来自中国碳排放交易试点城市的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(7):11128-11149. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-31903-3. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
5
Evaluation of carbon emission reduction effect and porter effect of China's carbon trading policy.中国碳交易政策的碳排放减少效应与波特效应评估
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(16):46527-46546. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25593-6. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
6
Have carbon emission trading pilot policy improved urban innovation capacity? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China.碳排放权交易试点政策是否提高了城市创新能力?来自中国准自然实验的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(7):10119-10132. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25699-x. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
7
Can carbon emission trading policy break China's urban carbon lock-in?碳排放交易政策能否打破中国城市碳锁定?
J Environ Manage. 2024 Feb 27;353:120129. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120129. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
8
Do the performance and efficiency of China's carbon emission trading market change over time?中国碳排放交易市场的表现和效率是否随时间变化?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Sep;27(26):33140-33160. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09168-3. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
9
Can the Carbon Emissions Trading System Improve the Green Total Factor Productivity of the Pilot Cities?-A Spatial Difference-in-Differences Econometric Analysis in China.碳排放交易体系能否提高试点城市的绿色全要素生产率?——基于中国空间双重差分的计量分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 22;19(3):1209. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031209.
10
The efficiency of carbon trading market in China: evidence from variance ratio tests.中国碳交易市场效率:基于方差比检验的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 May;26(14):14362-14372. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04778-y. Epub 2019 Mar 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Tax Policy and Total Factor Carbon Emission Efficiency: Evidence from China's VAT Reform.税收政策与全要素碳排放效率:来自中国增值税改革的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 28;19(15):9257. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159257.
2
Can China's Carbon Emissions Trading System Achieve the Synergistic Effect of Carbon Reduction and Pollution Control?中国碳排放权交易体系能否实现碳减排与污染控制协同效应?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;19(15):8932. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19158932.
3
The effectiveness of China's regional carbon market pilots in reducing firm emissions.
中国区域碳市场试点对企业减排的有效性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 28;118(52). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2109912118.
4
Has Carbon Emissions Trading Reduced PM in China?碳排放交易是否减少了中国的 PM 污染?
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 May 18;55(10):6631-6643. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c00248. Epub 2021 May 7.
5
Assessing market efficiency and liquidity: Evidence from China's emissions trading scheme pilots.评估市场效率和流动性:来自中国碳排放交易试点的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 May 15;769:144707. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144707. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
6
Integrating ecosystem services value and uncertainty into regional ecological risk assessment: A case study of Hubei Province, Central China.将生态系统服务价值和不确定性纳入区域生态风险评估:以中国中部湖北省为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Oct 20;740:140126. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140126. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
7
How does emission trading reduce China's carbon intensity? An exploration using a decomposition and difference-in-differences approach.排放交易如何降低中国的碳强度?基于分解法和双重差分法的探究
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Aug 1;676:514-523. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.303. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
8
An emissions-socioeconomic inventory of Chinese cities.中国城市排放-社会经济清单。
Sci Data. 2019 Feb 26;6:190027. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2019.27.
9
China's environment in a globalizing world.全球化世界中的中国环境。
Nature. 2005 Jun 30;435(7046):1179-86. doi: 10.1038/4351179a.