• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用生物信息学分析筛选脓毒症和脓毒性休克的关键基因

Screening of Key Genes of Sepsis and Septic Shock Using Bioinformatics Analysis.

作者信息

Zeng Xiaoliang, Feng Jihua, Yang Yanli, Zhao Ruzhi, Yu Qiao, Qin Han, Wei Lile, Ji Pan, Li Hongyuan, Wu Zimeng, Zhang Jianfeng

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530007, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Inflamm Res. 2021 Mar 11;14:829-841. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S301663. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.2147/JIR.S301663
PMID:33737824
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7962593/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Sepsis is a disease associated with high mortality. We performed bioinformatic analysis to identify key biomarkers associated with sepsis and septic shock.

METHODS

The top 20% of genes showing the greatest variance between sepsis and controls in the GSE13904 dataset (children) were screened by co-expression network analysis. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified through analyzing differential gene expression between sepsis patients and control in the GSE13904 (children) and GSE154918 (adult) data sets. Intersection analysis of module genes and DEGs was performed to identify common DEGs for enrichment analysis, protein-protein interaction network (PPI network) analysis, and Short Time-series Expression Miner (STEM) analysis. The PPI network genes were ranked by degree of connectivity, and the top 100 sepsis-associated genes were identified based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). In addition, we evaluated differences in immune cell infiltration between sepsis patients and controls in children (GSE13904, GSE25504) and adults (GSE9960, GSE154918). Finally, we analyzed differences in DNA methylation levels between sepsis patients and controls in GSE138074 (adults).

RESULTS

The common genes were associated mainly with up-regulated inflammatory and metabolic responses, as well as down-regulated immune responses. Sepsis patients showed lower infiltration by most types of immune cells. Genes in the PPI network with AUC values greater than 0.9 in both GSE13904 (children) and GSE154918 (adults) were screened as key genes for diagnosis. These key genes (MAPK14, FGR, RHOG, LAT, PRKACB, UBE2Q2, ITK, IL2RB, and CD247) were also identified in STEM analysis to be progressively dysregulated across controls, sepsis patients and patients with septic shock. In addition, the expression of MAPK14, FGR, and CD247 was modified by methylation.

CONCLUSION

This study identified several potential diagnostic genes and inflammatory and metabolic responses mechanisms associated with the development of sepsis.

摘要

目的

脓毒症是一种死亡率很高的疾病。我们进行了生物信息学分析,以确定与脓毒症和脓毒性休克相关的关键生物标志物。

方法

通过共表达网络分析筛选出GSE13904数据集(儿童)中脓毒症组与对照组之间差异最大的前20%的基因。通过分析GSE13904(儿童)和GSE154918(成人)数据集中脓毒症患者与对照组之间的基因表达差异,确定差异表达基因(DEG)。对模块基因和DEG进行交集分析,以识别用于富集分析、蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用网络(PPI网络)分析和短时序列表达挖掘器(STEM)分析的共同DEG。根据连接度对PPI网络基因进行排序,并基于受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积确定前100个与脓毒症相关的基因。此外,我们评估了儿童(GSE13904、GSE25504)和成人(GSE9960、GSE154918)中脓毒症患者与对照组之间免疫细胞浸润的差异。最后,我们分析了GSE138074(成人)中脓毒症患者与对照组之间DNA甲基化水平的差异。

结果

共同基因主要与上调的炎症和代谢反应以及下调的免疫反应相关。脓毒症患者大多数类型免疫细胞的浸润较低。在GSE13904(儿童)和GSE154918(成人)中AUC值均大于0.9的PPI网络中的基因被筛选为诊断关键基因。这些关键基因(MAPK14、FGR、RHOG、LAT、PRKACB、UBE2Q2、ITK、IL2RB和CD247)在STEM分析中也被确定为在对照组、脓毒症患者和脓毒性休克患者中逐渐失调。此外,MAPK14、FGR和CD247的表达受到甲基化的影响。

结论

本研究确定了几个与脓毒症发生发展相关的潜在诊断基因以及炎症和代谢反应机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c68/7962593/3ca26bfe20c2/JIR-14-829-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c68/7962593/52108ab21e04/JIR-14-829-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c68/7962593/362862577f20/JIR-14-829-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c68/7962593/afb2f0e8e5f5/JIR-14-829-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c68/7962593/04acde4f56ac/JIR-14-829-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c68/7962593/6de1dab632eb/JIR-14-829-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c68/7962593/54cb192a8f3b/JIR-14-829-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c68/7962593/a86d855088d3/JIR-14-829-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c68/7962593/3ca26bfe20c2/JIR-14-829-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c68/7962593/52108ab21e04/JIR-14-829-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c68/7962593/362862577f20/JIR-14-829-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c68/7962593/afb2f0e8e5f5/JIR-14-829-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c68/7962593/04acde4f56ac/JIR-14-829-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c68/7962593/6de1dab632eb/JIR-14-829-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c68/7962593/54cb192a8f3b/JIR-14-829-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c68/7962593/a86d855088d3/JIR-14-829-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c68/7962593/3ca26bfe20c2/JIR-14-829-g0008.jpg

相似文献

1
Screening of Key Genes of Sepsis and Septic Shock Using Bioinformatics Analysis.运用生物信息学分析筛选脓毒症和脓毒性休克的关键基因
J Inflamm Res. 2021 Mar 11;14:829-841. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S301663. eCollection 2021.
2
and : Key Genes for Septic Shock Based on Bioinformatics and Meta-Analysis.基于生物信息学和荟萃分析的脓毒症休克关键基因。
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2022;25(10):1722-1730. doi: 10.2174/1386207324666210816123508.
3
Bioinformatics Analysis for Multiple Gene Expression Profiles in Sepsis.脓毒症中多个基因表达谱的生物信息学分析。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Apr 13;26:e920818. doi: 10.12659/MSM.920818.
4
Identification of Potential Early Diagnostic Biomarkers of Sepsis.脓毒症潜在早期诊断生物标志物的鉴定
J Inflamm Res. 2021 Mar 3;14:621-631. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S298604. eCollection 2021.
5
CD3D and CD247 are the molecular targets of septic shock.CD3D 和 CD247 是感染性休克的分子靶标。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jul 21;102(29):e34295. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034295.
6
Identification of Immune-Related Key Genes as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers of Sepsis in Children.鉴定免疫相关关键基因作为儿童脓毒症潜在诊断生物标志物
J Inflamm Res. 2022 Apr 14;15:2441-2459. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S359908. eCollection 2022.
7
Data-driven analysis that integrates bioinformatics and machine learning uncovers PANoptosis-related diagnostic genes in early pediatric septic shock.整合生物信息学和机器学习的数据驱动分析揭示了小儿早期脓毒性休克中与全细胞程序性死亡相关的诊断基因。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 12;10(18):e37853. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37853. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.
8
Analysis of signature genes and association with immune cells infiltration in pediatric septic shock.分析儿童感染性休克的特征基因与免疫细胞浸润的关系。
Front Immunol. 2022 Nov 10;13:1056750. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1056750. eCollection 2022.
9
Diagnostic and Predictive Values of Ferroptosis-Related Genes in Child Sepsis.铁死亡相关基因在儿童脓毒症中的诊断和预测价值。
Front Immunol. 2022 Jun 30;13:881914. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.881914. eCollection 2022.
10
Identification and validation of a novel mitochondrion-related gene signature for diagnosis and immune infiltration in sepsis.鉴定和验证一种新的与线粒体相关的基因特征,用于脓毒症的诊断和免疫浸润。
Front Immunol. 2023 Jun 15;14:1196306. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1196306. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of hub genes and prediction of the ceRNA network in adult sepsis.成人脓毒症中枢纽基因的鉴定及ceRNA网络的预测
PeerJ. 2025 Aug 13;13:e19619. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19619. eCollection 2025.
2
Exploring ENPP5 as a diagnostic biomarker for sepsis: a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis.探索ENPP5作为脓毒症的诊断生物标志物:一项全面的生物信息学分析
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):831. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11152-6.
3
Identification of potential crucial genes and biomarkers from neutrophils in sepsis using bioinformatics analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Identification of Genes with Altered Methylation and Its Role in Early Diagnosis of Sepsis-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.甲基化改变基因的鉴定及其在脓毒症诱导的急性呼吸窘迫综合征早期诊断中的作用
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Jan 25;14:243-253. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S287960. eCollection 2021.
2
Identification of Potential Biomarkers and Immune Features of Sepsis Using Bioinformatics Analysis.基于生物信息学分析鉴定脓毒症的潜在生物标志物和免疫特征。
Mediators Inflamm. 2020 Oct 9;2020:3432587. doi: 10.1155/2020/3432587. eCollection 2020.
3
Discovery and Validation of Urinary Molecular Signature of Early Sepsis.
利用生物信息学分析从脓毒症中性粒细胞中鉴定潜在关键基因和生物标志物
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jan 3;104(1):e41216. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041216.
4
Immune dysregulation in COVID-19 induced ARDS in kidney transplant recipients revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing.单细胞RNA测序揭示肾移植受者中COVID-19诱发的急性呼吸窘迫综合征的免疫失调
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 26;15(1):6895. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91439-5.
5
From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Therapy: Understanding Sepsis-Induced Multiple Organ Dysfunction.从分子机制到临床治疗:了解脓毒症引起的多器官功能障碍。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jul 16;25(14):7770. doi: 10.3390/ijms25147770.
6
Genetic polymorphisms, biomarkers and signaling pathways associated with septic shock: from diagnosis to therapeutic targets.与感染性休克相关的基因多态性、生物标志物及信号通路:从诊断到治疗靶点
Burns Trauma. 2024 May 6;12:tkae006. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkae006. eCollection 2024.
7
Exploring the biomarkers and potential therapeutic drugs for sepsis via integrated bioinformatic analysis.通过综合生物信息学分析探索脓毒症的生物标志物和潜在治疗药物。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08883-9.
8
Classification of subtypes and identification of dysregulated genes in sepsis.脓毒症亚型分类及失调基因鉴定。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Aug 21;13:1226159. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1226159. eCollection 2023.
9
Single-Cell RNA Sequencing and Transcriptome Analysis Revealed the Immune Microenvironment and Gene Markers of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.单细胞RNA测序与转录组分析揭示急性呼吸窘迫综合征的免疫微环境及基因标志物
J Inflamm Res. 2023 Aug 1;16:3205-3217. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S419576. eCollection 2023.
10
CD3D and CD247 are the molecular targets of septic shock.CD3D 和 CD247 是感染性休克的分子靶标。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jul 21;102(29):e34295. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034295.
早期脓毒症尿液分子标志物的发现与验证
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Sep 25;2(10):e0195. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000195. eCollection 2020 Oct.
4
Screening of key genes related to the prognosis of mouse sepsis.筛选与小鼠脓毒症预后相关的关键基因。
Biosci Rep. 2020 Oct 30;40(10). doi: 10.1042/BSR20202649.
5
Impact of different consensus definition criteria on sepsis diagnosis in a cohort of critically ill patients-Insights from a new mathematical probabilistic approach to mortality-based validation of sepsis criteria.不同共识定义标准对危重症患者脓毒症诊断的影响——基于新的数学概率方法对基于死亡率的脓毒症标准进行验证的见解。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 8;15(9):e0238548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238548. eCollection 2020.
6
Inhibiting DNA Methylation Improves Survival in Severe Sepsis by Regulating NF-κB Pathway.抑制 DNA 甲基化通过调控 NF-κB 通路改善严重脓毒症患者的生存。
Front Immunol. 2020 Jul 2;11:1360. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01360. eCollection 2020.
7
An information-theoretic approach for measuring the distance of organ tissue samples using their transcriptomic signatures.基于转录组特征的器官组织样本距离测量的信息论方法。
Bioinformatics. 2021 Jan 29;36(21):5194-5204. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa654.
8
Two gene set variation indexes as potential diagnostic tool for sepsis.两种基因集变异指数作为脓毒症的潜在诊断工具。
Am J Transl Res. 2020 Jun 15;12(6):2749-2759. eCollection 2020.
9
Epidemiology and burden of sepsis acquired in hospitals and intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis.医院和重症监护病房获得性脓毒症的流行病学和负担:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug;46(8):1536-1551. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06106-2. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
10
The Metabolic Basis of Immune Dysfunction Following Sepsis and Trauma.脓毒症和创伤后免疫功能障碍的代谢基础。
Front Immunol. 2020 May 29;11:1043. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01043. eCollection 2020.