University of Turin, Viale 25 aprile 137 int 6, 10133, Torino, Italy.
J Orthop Traumatol. 2021 Mar 18;22(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s10195-021-00573-z.
Femoral shaft fractures are usually treated with nailing using a traction table and a perineal post, but this may occasionally result in various groin-related complications, including pudendal nerve neurapraxia. Although most of them are transient, complication rates of up to 26% are reported. Recently, postless distraction technique has been described for elective hip arthroscopy. In this study we compared post and postless distraction technique in femoral shaft fracture nailing in terms of (1) quality of reduction, (2) outcome, and (3) complications.
We reviewed 50 patients treated with postless distraction nailing technique for femoral shaft fractures and compared them with our historical case series (95 patients). The following data were collected for all patients: age, gender, weight, height, diagnoses (fractures were classified according to the 2018 revision of AO classification), type and size of nail surgical timing, Trendelenburg angles during surgery, quality of reduction according to Baumgaertner and Thoresen classifications, Modified Harris Hip Scores at 6 months, and perineal complications.
Median age was 53 years, and median weight was 70 kg (range 50-103 kg). We found no significant difference in terms of quality of reduction (72 versus 74% "excellent" reduction for subtrochanteric fractures, while 81 versus 79% "excellent" reduction for femoral shaft fractures) and functional outcomes (Modified Harris Hip Score 74 versus 79). One patient in the control group had a failure of the fixation, and one patient in the postless group had a deep infection. Two patients in the control group reported pudendal nerve neurapraxia for 4 months, while none reported complication linked to the postless technique.
Our results using the postless distraction technique show a sufficient distraction to allow reduction and internal fixation of the femoral fracture with a standard femoral nail.
IV.
股骨干骨折通常采用牵引床和会阴柱固定进行髓内钉治疗,但偶尔会出现各种腹股沟相关并发症,包括阴部神经挫伤。尽管大多数是暂时的,但据报道,并发症发生率高达 26%。最近,有人描述了用于择期髋关节镜检查的无会阴柱牵开技术。在这项研究中,我们比较了带会阴柱和不带会阴柱牵开技术在股骨干骨折髓内钉固定中的(1)复位质量,(2)结果和(3)并发症。
我们回顾了 50 例采用无会阴柱牵开技术治疗股骨干骨折的患者,并将其与我们的历史病例系列(95 例)进行比较。所有患者均收集以下数据:年龄、性别、体重、身高、诊断(骨折按 2018 年 AO 分类修订版分类)、钉类型和大小、手术时机、手术时的 Trendelenburg 角、根据 Baumgaertner 和 Thoresen 分类的复位质量、6 个月时改良 Harris 髋关节评分和会阴并发症。
中位年龄为 53 岁,中位体重为 70kg(范围 50-103kg)。我们发现,在复位质量(对于转子下骨折,72%与 74%为“优秀”复位,对于股骨干骨折,81%与 79%为“优秀”复位)和功能结果(改良 Harris 髋关节评分 74 与 79)方面无显著差异。对照组 1 例固定失败,无会阴柱组 1 例深部感染。对照组 2 例患者出现阴部神经挫伤,持续 4 个月,无会阴柱组无与无会阴柱技术相关的并发症报告。
我们使用无会阴柱牵开技术的结果表明,该技术足以提供足够的牵开力,以允许使用标准股骨髓内钉复位和固定股骨骨折。
IV 级。