• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在反复着床失败的病例中比较序贯移植与第 3 天和第 5 天胚胎移植:随机对照试验。

Comparing sequential vs day 3 vs day 5 embryo transfers in cases with recurrent implantation failure: randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, October 6th University & Air-Force Specialized Hospital- Cairo, Egypt.

Obstetrics & Gynecology Department, Al-Galaa Teaching Hospital & Air-Force Specialized Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

JBRA Assist Reprod. 2021 Apr 27;25(2):185-192. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20200083.

DOI:10.5935/1518-0557.20200083
PMID:33739797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8083859/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The recent improvement in sequential media has refocused its attention on the role of human blastocysts in ART, not only because of its advantages but also because of the possible cancellation of embryo transfer when relying on blastocyst transfer only. Hence, the idea of sequential transfer on day 3 and day 5 was proposed. Objective: To compare the pregnancy outcomes of sequential embryo transfer on day 3 and day 5, versus cleavage transfer on day 3 and blastocyst transfer on day 5 in cases of recurrent implantation failure.

METHODS

This was a prospective and randomized trial, in which 210 qualified patients with recurrent implantation failures undergoing IVF/ICSI were randomized into three groups, each group included 70 patients. Embryo transfer was performed in day 3 in the first group, day 5 (blastocyst transfer) in the second group and sequential embryo transfer in days 3 and 5 in the third group. We assessed pregnancy outcomes from all the three groups. Results: Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were significantly higher in the sequential group than either group day-3 or day-5 of embryo transfer in cases with recurrent implantation failures.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential embryo transfer in cases with recurrent implantation failures and adequate number of retrieved oocytes is associated with higher implantation and clinical pregnancy rates, and it is advocated for patients having an adequate number of good quality embryos.

摘要

目的

最近连续媒体的改进重新引起了人们对人类囊胚在 ART 中的作用的关注,这不仅是因为其优势,还因为仅依靠囊胚转移可能会取消胚胎转移。因此,提出了第 3 天和第 5 天连续转移的想法。目的:比较反复着床失败患者第 3 天和第 5 天的连续胚胎转移与第 3 天的卵裂期胚胎转移和第 5 天的囊胚转移的妊娠结局。

方法

这是一项前瞻性随机试验,其中 210 名符合条件的反复着床失败的 IVF/ICSI 患者被随机分为三组,每组 70 例。第 1 组在第 3 天进行胚胎移植,第 2 组在第 5 天(囊胚移植)进行胚胎移植,第 3 组在第 3 天和第 5 天进行连续胚胎移植。我们评估了所有三组的妊娠结局。结果:反复着床失败患者中,连续胚胎移植组的临床妊娠率和活产率明显高于第 3 天或第 5 天胚胎移植组。

结论

对于有足够数量优质胚胎的反复着床失败患者,连续胚胎移植与更高的着床率和临床妊娠率相关,因此建议此类患者采用该方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf2/8083859/3e266a94af89/jbra-25-02-0185-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf2/8083859/0e0e05acc6d0/jbra-25-02-0185-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf2/8083859/3e266a94af89/jbra-25-02-0185-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf2/8083859/0e0e05acc6d0/jbra-25-02-0185-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf2/8083859/3e266a94af89/jbra-25-02-0185-g02.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing sequential vs day 3 vs day 5 embryo transfers in cases with recurrent implantation failure: randomized controlled trial.在反复着床失败的病例中比较序贯移植与第 3 天和第 5 天胚胎移植:随机对照试验。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2021 Apr 27;25(2):185-192. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20200083.
2
Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception.辅助生殖中卵裂期胚胎移植与囊胚期胚胎移植的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(2):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.
3
Comparing the effect of sequential embryo transfer versus double blastocyst embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles in patients with repeated implantation failure: A randomized controlled trial.比较序贯胚胎移植与双囊胚胚胎移植对反复种植失败患者卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)周期妊娠结局的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar;62(2):264-269. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2022.10.009.
4
Leave the past behind: women's reproductive history shows no association with blastocysts' euploidy and limited association with live birth rates after euploid embryo transfers.放下过去:女性的生殖史与囊胚的整倍体率无关,与整倍体胚胎移植后的活产率关联有限。
Hum Reprod. 2021 Mar 18;36(4):929-940. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab014.
5
Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.辅助生殖技术中卵裂期胚胎移植与囊胚期胚胎移植的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 30(6):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub5.
6
No advantage of fresh blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer in women under the age of 39: a randomized controlled study.39 岁以下女性中,新鲜囊胚与卵裂期胚胎移植比较并无优势:一项随机对照研究。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Mar;35(3):457-465. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1092-2. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
7
Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception.辅助生殖中卵裂期胚胎移植与囊胚期胚胎移植的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub2.
8
Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.辅助生殖技术中卵裂期胚胎移植与囊胚期胚胎移植的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11(7):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub4.
9
Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception.辅助生殖中卵裂期胚胎移植与囊胚期胚胎移植的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17(4):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub3.
10
Impact of oxygen tension according to embryo stage of development: a prospective randomized study.根据胚胎发育阶段评估氧张力的影响:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 16;11(1):22313. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01488-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Live birth rate and perinatal outcomes following sequential embryo transfer in women with recurrent implantation failure undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.在接受冻融胚胎移植周期的反复植入失败女性中,序贯胚胎移植后的活产率和围产期结局。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07557-5.
2
Effect of sequential cleavage and blastocyst embryo transfer compared to single cleavage stage embryo transfer on assisted reproductive technology outcome: An RCT.与单卵裂期胚胎移植相比,序贯卵裂和囊胚期胚胎移植对辅助生殖技术结局的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Reprod Biomed. 2024 Aug 5;22(6):433-440. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v22i6.16793. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The sequential embryo transfer compared to blastocyst embryo transfer in fertilization (IVF) cycle in patients with the three repeated consecutive IVF. A randomized controlled trial.在经历三次连续 IVF 周期的患者中,与囊胚胚胎移植相比,IVF 周期中的序贯胚胎移植。一项随机对照试验。
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019 Nov;35(11):955-959. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1613639. Epub 2019 May 15.
2
Functional expression of the mechanosensitive PIEZO1 channel in primary endometrial epithelial cells and endometrial organoids.原发性子宫内膜上皮细胞和子宫内膜类器官中机械敏感 PIEZO1 通道的功能表达。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 11;9(1):1779. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-38376-8.
3
Sequential embryo transfer versus double cleavage-stage embryo or double blastocyst transfer in patients with recurrent implantation failure with frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a cohort study.
冻融胚胎移植周期中反复着床失败患者行序贯胚胎移植与卵裂期胚胎或囊胚双移植的比较:一项队列研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 8;14:1238251. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1238251. eCollection 2023.
Mixed double-embryo transfer: A promising approach for patients with repeated implantation failure.
混合双胚胎移植:一种针对反复种植失败患者的有前景的方法。
Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2017 Jun;44(2):105-110. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2017.44.2.105. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
4
Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.辅助生殖技术中卵裂期胚胎移植与囊胚期胚胎移植的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 30(6):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub5.
5
What exactly do we mean by 'recurrent implantation failure'? A systematic review and opinion.我们所说的“反复种植失败”究竟是什么意思?一项系统评价与观点。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Apr;28(4):409-23. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
6
Using the ovarian sensitivity index to define poor, normal, and high response after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the long gonadotropin-releasing hormone-agonist protocol: suggestions for a new principle to solve an old problem.采用卵巢反应性指数来定义长方案降调节控制性卵巢刺激后卵巢反应不良、正常和高反应:解决老问题的新思路。
Fertil Steril. 2013 Nov;100(5):1270-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.06.049. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
7
Day-2 and day-3 sequential transfer improves pregnancy rate in patients with repeated IVF-embryo transfer failure: a retrospective case-control study.第 2 天和第 3 天连续移植可提高反复 IVF-胚胎移植失败患者的妊娠率:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Jan;26(1):30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.10.004. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
8
Assessment and treatment of repeated implantation failure (RIF).反复种植失败(RIF)的评估和治疗。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012 Nov;29(11):1227-39. doi: 10.1007/s10815-012-9861-4. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
9
ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria.ESHRE 共识:体外受精卵巢刺激反应不良的定义:博洛尼亚标准。
Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1616-24. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der092. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
10
First Irish delivery following sequential, two-stage embryo and blastocyst transfer.首例爱尔兰通过序贯两步法胚胎和囊胚移植诞生的婴儿。
Ir J Med Sci. 2012 Sep;181(3):349-51. doi: 10.1007/s11845-009-0430-5. Epub 2009 Oct 8.