Quadram Institute of Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2021 Apr;21(4):371-380. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2021.1906652. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
Nosocomial infections represent a major problem for the health-care systems worldwide. Currently, diagnosis relies on microbiological culture, which is slow and has poor sensitivity. While waiting for a diagnosis, patients are treated with empiric broad spectrum antimicrobials, which are often inappropriate for the infecting pathogen. This results in poor patient outcomes, poor antimicrobial stewardship and increased costs for health-care systems. Clinical metagenomics (CMg), the application of metagenomic sequencing for the diagnosis of infection, has the potential to become a viable alternative to culture that can offer rapid results with high accuracy. In this article, we review current CMg methods for the diagnosis of nosocomial bloodstream (BSI) and lower respiratory-tract infections (LRTI). CMg approaches are more accurate in LRTI compared to BSI. This is because BSIs are caused by low pathogen numbers in a high background of human cells. To overcome this, most approaches focus on cell-free DNA, but, to date, these tests are not accurate enough yet to replace blood culture. The higher pathogen numbers in LRTI samples make this a more suitable for CMg and accurate approaches have been developed, which are likely to be implemented in hospitals within the next 2-5 years.
医院感染是全球医疗保健系统面临的主要问题。目前的诊断依赖于微生物培养,这种方法缓慢且灵敏度低。在等待诊断结果的过程中,患者通常会接受经验性广谱抗生素治疗,但这种治疗方法往往不适用于感染病原体。这导致患者治疗效果不佳、抗菌药物管理不善以及医疗保健系统成本增加。临床宏基因组学(CMg)是一种应用宏基因组测序来诊断感染的方法,它有可能成为一种替代培养的可行方法,能够提供快速且高度准确的结果。在本文中,我们回顾了目前用于诊断医院获得性血流感染(BSI)和下呼吸道感染(LRTI)的 CMg 方法。与 BSI 相比,CMg 方法在 LRTI 中的准确性更高。这是因为 BSIs 是由低数量的病原体在高背景的人类细胞中引起的。为了克服这一问题,大多数方法都集中在无细胞 DNA 上,但迄今为止,这些测试还不够准确,无法替代血液培养。LRTI 样本中的病原体数量更高,因此更适合 CMg,并且已经开发出了准确的方法,这些方法可能在未来 2-5 年内应用于医院。