University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nuffield College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Qual Health Res. 2021 Jun;31(7):1358-1370. doi: 10.1177/1049732321998062. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
Reflexivity constitutes a core component of qualitative research and has been actively integrated into long-term and "lone ranger" approaches to qualitative research. However, its application to team-based approaches and particularly to rapid qualitative team-based approaches continues to lag behind. In this article, we introduce a reflexivity model we developed for teams undertaking rapid qualitative studies. Utilizing our most recent application of this model to a rapid qualitative appraisal of health care workers' experiences delivering care during the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study, we identify the steps to put this model into practice and its main outcomes. Our application of the model revealed that the team's practices could be grouped along four dimensions: design assumptions, data collection and analysis processes, multidisciplinary collaboration, and responsible dissemination. Reflexivity can improve the relations within the team and the quality of the research output, if it is implemented as a continuous and iterative process.
反思性是定性研究的核心组成部分，已被积极纳入长期的、“独行者”式的定性研究方法中。然而，将其应用于团队方法，特别是快速定性团队方法方面，仍然滞后。在本文中，我们介绍了一个我们为从事快速定性研究的团队开发的反思性模型。利用我们最近将该模型应用于对医疗保健工作者在 COVID-19 大流行期间提供护理的经验进行快速定性评估的案例研究，我们确定了将该模型付诸实践的步骤及其主要结果。我们对该模型的应用表明，团队的实践可以沿着四个维度进行分组：设计假设、数据收集和分析过程、多学科合作以及负责任的传播。如果将反思性作为一个持续和迭代的过程来实施，它可以提高团队内部的关系和研究成果的质量。
