Suppr超能文献

右心室对压力超负荷的适应:慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压与特发性肺动脉高压的差异。

Right ventricular adaptation to pressure-overload: Differences between chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 Jun;40(6):458-466. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.02.018. Epub 2021 Feb 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (iPAH) are both associated with right ventricular (RV) failure and mortality. However, CTEPH patients are older, more often male and usually have more co-morbidities than iPAH patients, including a history of venous thromboembolism. Therefore, RV adaptation to pressure-overload in CTEPH may be different than in iPAH.

METHODS

We included all treatment-naive CTEPH and iPAH patients diagnosed in the Amsterdam UMC between 2000 and 2019 if cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and a right heart catheterization were performed at time of diagnosis. Load-dependent RV volumes and mass were assessed with CMR. Load-independent RV contractility, afterload and diastolic stiffness in relation to afterload were obtained using single beat pressure-volume loop analysis. Differences in RV characteristics between CTEPH and iPAH were analyzed using multiple linear regression with interaction testing after correcting for confounders.

RESULTS

We included 235 patients in this study and performed pressure-volume loop analysis in 136 patients. In addition to being older and more often male, CTEPH patients had a lower pulmonary vascular resistance than iPAH patients at the time of diagnosis. After correcting for these confounders, CTEPH patients had a somewhat higher RV end-diastolic volume index (87 ± 27 ml vs 82 ± 25 ml; p < .01), and a lower RV relative wall thickness (0.6 ± 0,1 g/ml vs 0.7 ± 0,2 g/ml; p < .01). The correlation coefficient of RV diastolic stiffness to afterload was higher in CTEPH compared to iPAH (p < .05; independent of age and gender).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite differences in patient characteristics, disease etiology and physiology, RV functional parameters in CTEPH and iPAH are mostly similar. The right ventricle in CTEPH is marginally more dilated, stiffer and less hypertrophic than in iPAH.

摘要

背景

慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)和特发性肺动脉高压(iPAH)均与右心室(RV)衰竭和死亡率相关。然而,CTEPH 患者年龄更大,男性更多,通常比 iPAH 患者有更多的合并症,包括静脉血栓栓塞史。因此,CTEPH 中 RV 对压力超负荷的适应可能与 iPAH 不同。

方法

我们纳入了 2000 年至 2019 年期间在阿姆斯特丹 UMC 诊断的所有未经治疗的 CTEPH 和 iPAH 患者,如果在诊断时进行了心脏磁共振成像(CMR)和右心导管检查。使用 CMR 评估依赖负荷的 RV 容积和质量。使用单次搏动压力-容积环分析获得与后负荷相关的独立于负荷的 RV 收缩性、后负荷和舒张僵硬。在校正混杂因素后,使用多元线性回归分析并进行交互检验,分析 CTEPH 和 iPAH 之间 RV 特征的差异。

结果

我们纳入了 235 名患者,对其中 136 名患者进行了压力-容积环分析。除了年龄较大和男性更多外,CTEPH 患者在诊断时的肺血管阻力也低于 iPAH 患者。在校正这些混杂因素后,CTEPH 患者的 RV 舒张末期容积指数稍高(87 ± 27 ml 比 82 ± 25 ml;p <.01),RV 相对壁厚度稍低(0.6 ± 0.1 g/ml 比 0.7 ± 0.2 g/ml;p <.01)。与 iPAH 相比,CTEPH 的 RV 舒张僵硬与后负荷的相关系数更高(p <.05;独立于年龄和性别)。

结论

尽管患者特征、病因和生理学存在差异,但 CTEPH 和 iPAH 的 RV 功能参数大多相似。CTEPH 中的右心室比 iPAH 稍扩张、僵硬和肥厚程度稍低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验