Liu Jun, van Iersel Marc W
Horticultural Physiology Laboratory, Department of Horticulture, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Mar 5;12:619987. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.619987. eCollection 2021.
Red and blue light are traditionally believed to have a higher quantum yield of CO assimilation (, moles of CO assimilated per mole of photons) than green light, because green light is absorbed less efficiently. However, because of its lower absorptance, green light can penetrate deeper and excite chlorophyll deeper in leaves. We hypothesized that, at high photosynthetic photon flux density (), green light may achieve higher and net CO assimilation rate ( ) than red or blue light, because of its more uniform absorption throughtout leaves. To test the interactive effects of and light spectrum on photosynthesis, we measured leaf of "Green Tower" lettuce () under red, blue, and green light, and combinations of those at s from 30 to 1,300 μmol⋅m⋅s. The electron transport rates () and the maximum Rubisco carboxylation rate ( ) at low (200 μmol⋅m⋅s) and high (1,000 μmol⋅m⋅s) were estimated from photosynthetic CO response curves. Both (maximum on incident basis) and at low were higher under red light than under blue and green light. Factoring in light absorption, (the maximum on absorbed basis) under green and red light were both higher than under blue light, indicating that the low under green light was due to lower absorptance, while absorbed blue photons were used inherently least efficiently. At high , the [gross CO assimilation ( )/incident ] and under red and green light were similar, and higher than under blue light, confirming our hypothesis. may not limit photosynthesis at a of 200 μmol m s and was largely unaffected by light spectrum at 1,000 μmol⋅m⋅s. and under different spectra were positively correlated, suggesting that the interactive effect between light spectrum and on photosynthesis was due to effects on . No interaction between the three colors of light was detected. In summary, at low , green light had the lowest photosynthetic efficiency because of its low absorptance. Contrary, at high , under green light was among the highest, likely resulting from more uniform distribution of green light in leaves.
传统观点认为,红光和蓝光的二氧化碳同化量子产率(每摩尔光子同化的二氧化碳摩尔数)高于绿光,因为绿光的吸收效率较低。然而,由于绿光的吸收率较低,它可以穿透得更深,并激发叶片中更深层的叶绿素。我们推测,在高光光合光子通量密度下,绿光可能比红光或蓝光实现更高的电子传递速率和净二氧化碳同化率,因为它在整个叶片中的吸收更为均匀。为了测试光合光子通量密度和光谱对光合作用的交互作用,我们在红光、蓝光和绿光以及它们在30至1300 μmol·m⁻²·s⁻¹的组合光照下,测量了“绿塔”生菜的叶片电子传递速率。从光合二氧化碳响应曲线估算了低光强(200 μmol·m⁻²·s⁻¹)和高光强(1000 μmol·m⁻²·s⁻¹)下的电子传递速率和最大羧化速率。基于入射光强的最大电子传递速率和低光强下的电子传递速率在红光下均高于蓝光和绿光。考虑到光吸收,绿光和红光下基于吸收光强的最大电子传递速率均高于蓝光,这表明绿光下较低的电子传递速率是由于吸收率较低,而吸收的蓝光光子本身利用效率最低。在高光强下,红光和绿光下的总二氧化碳同化量与入射光强的比值以及净二氧化碳同化率相似,且高于蓝光,证实了我们的假设。在200 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹的光强下,电子传递速率可能不会限制光合作用,并且在1000 μmol·m⁻²·s⁻¹时很大程度上不受光谱的影响。不同光谱下的电子传递速率和最大羧化速率呈正相关,这表明光谱和光合光子通量密度对光合作用的交互作用是由于对电子传递速率的影响。未检测到三种颜色光之间的相互作用。总之,在低光强下,绿光由于吸收率低而具有最低的光合效率。相反,在高光强下,绿光下的净二氧化碳同化率处于最高水平之一,这可能是由于绿光在叶片中分布更均匀所致。