• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用系统方法对来自以色列的L.果实进行商品风险评估。

Commodity risk assessment of L. fruits from Israel for under a systems approach.

作者信息

Bragard Claude, Dehnen-Schmutz Katharina, Di Serio Francesco, Gonthier Paolo, Jacques Marie-Agnès, Jaques Miret Josep Anton, Justesen Annemarie Fejer, MacLeod Alan, Magnusson Christer Sven, Navas-Cortes Juan A, Parnell Stephen, Potting Roel, Reignault Philippe Lucien, Thulke Hans-Hermann, Van der Werf Wopke, Vicent Civera Antonio, Yuen Jonathan, Zappalà Lucia, Lucchi Andrea, Tena Alejandro, Mosbach-Schulz Olaf, de la Peña Eduardo, Milonas Panagiotis

出版信息

EFSA J. 2021 Mar 17;19(3):e06427. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6427. eCollection 2021 Mar.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6427
PMID:33747229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7967282/
Abstract

The European Commission requested EFSA Panel on Plant Health to evaluate a dossier from Israel in which the application of the systems approach to mitigate the risk of entry of to the EU when trading citrus fruits is described. After collecting additional evidence from the Plant Protection and Inspection Services (PPIS) of Israel, and reviewing the published literature, the Panel performed an assessment on the likelihood of pest freedom for on citrus fruits at the point of entry in the EU considering the Israelian systems approach. An expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom following the evaluation of the risk mitigation measures on , including any uncertainties. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation indicated, with 95% certainty that between 9,863 and 10,000 citrus fruits per 10,000 will be free from this pest. The Panel also evaluated each risk mitigation measure in the systems approach and identified any weaknesses associated with them. Specific actions are identified that could increase the efficacy of the systems approach.

摘要

欧盟委员会要求欧洲食品安全局植物健康小组评估一份来自以色列的档案,其中描述了采用系统方法降低柑橘类水果贸易时进入欧盟的风险。在从以色列植物保护和检查局(PPIS)收集了更多证据并查阅了已发表的文献后,小组根据以色列的系统方法,对欧盟入境点的柑橘类水果上无该有害生物的可能性进行了评估。在评估了针对该有害生物的风险缓解措施(包括任何不确定性)后,给出了关于无有害生物可能性的专家判断。专家知识 elicitation 表明,有 95%的把握确定每 10000 个柑橘类水果中有 9863 至 10000 个将无此有害生物。小组还评估了系统方法中的每项风险缓解措施,并确定了与之相关的任何弱点。确定了可以提高系统方法有效性的具体行动。 (注:“elicitation”这个词在这里可能有误,不太明确准确意思,暂保留原文翻译)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/492c/7967282/153658a5e0a4/EFS2-19-e06427-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/492c/7967282/7bec2e7b6a19/EFS2-19-e06427-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/492c/7967282/8f6b321cce09/EFS2-19-e06427-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/492c/7967282/01bb11434ade/EFS2-19-e06427-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/492c/7967282/153658a5e0a4/EFS2-19-e06427-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/492c/7967282/7bec2e7b6a19/EFS2-19-e06427-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/492c/7967282/8f6b321cce09/EFS2-19-e06427-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/492c/7967282/01bb11434ade/EFS2-19-e06427-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/492c/7967282/153658a5e0a4/EFS2-19-e06427-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Commodity risk assessment of L. fruits from Israel for under a systems approach.采用系统方法对来自以色列的L.果实进行商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2021 Mar 17;19(3):e06427. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6427. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Commodity risk assessment of L. fruits from South Africa for under a systems approach.采用系统方法对来自南非的L.水果进行商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2021 Aug 19;19(8):e06799. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6799. eCollection 2021 Aug.
3
Commodity risk assessment of from Israel.来自以色列的商品风险评估。 (你提供的原文“Commodity risk assessment of from Israel.”表述似乎不完整,少了具体所评估的商品内容,但按照要求进行了如上翻译。)
EFSA J. 2021 Feb 3;19(2):e06354. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6354. eCollection 2021 Feb.
4
Commodity risk assessment of fruits from Suriname.苏里南水果的商品风险评估
EFSA J. 2021 Feb 13;19(2):e06396. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6396. eCollection 2021 Feb.
5
Commodity risk assessment of plants from .来自……的植物的商品风险评估
EFSA J. 2020 Aug 12;18(8):e06225. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6225. eCollection 2020 Aug.
6
Commodity risk assessment of fruits from Thailand.泰国水果的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2021 Feb 13;19(2):e06399. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6399. eCollection 2021 Feb.
7
Commodity risk assessment of fruits from Honduras.洪都拉斯水果的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2021 Feb 13;19(2):e06395. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6395. eCollection 2021 Feb.
8
Commodity risk assessment of fruits from Mexico.墨西哥水果的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2021 Feb 13;19(2):e06398. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6398. eCollection 2021 Feb.
9
Assessment of the probability of introduction of into the European Union with import of cut roses.评估随着进口切花玫瑰而传入欧盟的可能性。
EFSA J. 2023 Oct 19;21(10):e08107. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8107. eCollection 2023 Oct.
10
Commodity risk assessment of fruits from Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡水果的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2021 Feb 13;19(2):e06397. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6397. eCollection 2021 Feb.

引用本文的文献

1
Standard protocols for plant health scientific assessments.植物健康科学评估的标准规程。
EFSA J. 2024 Sep 5;22(9):e8891. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8891. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Profile of Fork-Tailed Bush Katydid (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) Feeding on Fruit of Clementine Mandarins.叉尾虫(直翅目:蟋蟀科)取食克莱门氏小柑橘果实的特征。
J Econ Entomol. 2021 Feb 9;114(1):215-224. doi: 10.1093/jee/toaa258.
2
Report on the methodology applied by EFSA to provide a quantitative assessment of pest-related criteria required to rank candidate priority pests as defined by Regulation (EU) 2016/2031.欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)为对《欧盟条例》(EU)2016/2031所定义的候选优先有害生物进行排名所需的有害生物相关标准进行定量评估而采用的方法报告。
EFSA J. 2019 Jun 5;17(6):e05731. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5731. eCollection 2019 Jun.
3
Guidance on commodity risk assessment for the evaluation of high risk plants dossiers.
用于评估高风险植物档案的商品风险评估指南。
EFSA J. 2019 Apr 29;17(4):e05668. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5668. eCollection 2019 Apr.
4
Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment.有害生物定量风险评估指南。
EFSA J. 2018 Aug 3;16(8):e05350. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5350. eCollection 2018 Aug.
5
Pest status, bio-ecology and management of the false codling moth, (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) and its implication for international trade.假苹果蠹蛾(Meyrick)(鳞翅目:卷蛾科)的虫害状况、生物生态学及其管理及其对国际贸易的影响。
Bull Entomol Res. 2021 Feb;111(1):17-30. doi: 10.1017/S0007485320000358. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
6
An Improved Systems Approach as a Phytosanitary Measure for Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Export Citrus Fruit From South Africa.改良系统方法作为南非出口柑橘水果中丽婀翠叶蝉(鳞翅目:卷蛾科)的植物检疫措施。
J Econ Entomol. 2020 Apr 6;113(2):700-711. doi: 10.1093/jee/toz336.
7
Field and Laboratory Performance of False Codling Moth, (Lepidoptera: Troticidae) on Orange and Selected Vegetables.柑橘小实蝇(鳞翅目:麦蛾科)在橙子及选定蔬菜上的田间和实验室表现
Insects. 2019 Feb 28;10(3):63. doi: 10.3390/insects10030063.
8
Comparing the Use of Laboratory-Reared and Field-Collected Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Larvae for Demonstrating Efficacy of Postharvest Cold Treatments in Citrus Fruit.比较实验室饲养和田间采集的柑橘小实蝇(鳞翅目:卷蛾科)幼虫在证明柑橘采后冷处理效果方面的应用
J Econ Entomol. 2016 Aug;109(4):1571-7. doi: 10.1093/jee/tow137. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
9
Partial Cold Treatment of Citrus Fruit for Export Risk Mitigation for Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) as Part of a Systems Approach.作为系统方法的一部分,对柑橘类水果进行局部冷藏以降低 Thaumatotibia leucotreta(鳞翅目:卷蛾科)的出口风险。
J Econ Entomol. 2016 Aug;109(4):1578-85. doi: 10.1093/jee/tow138. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
10
Mating Disruption for the 21st Century: Matching Technology With Mechanism.21世纪的交配干扰:使技术与机制相匹配
Environ Entomol. 2015 Jun;44(3):427-53. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvv052. Epub 2015 Apr 27.