• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

斯里兰卡水果的商品风险评估。

Commodity risk assessment of fruits from Sri Lanka.

作者信息

Bragard Claude, Dehnen-Schmutz Katharina, Di Serio Francesco, Gonthier Paolo, Jacques Marie-Agnès, Jaques Miret Josep Anton, Justesen Annemarie Fejer, MacLeod Alan, Magnusson Christer Sven, Navas-Cortes Juan A, Parnell Stephen, Potting Roel, Reignault Philippe Lucien, Thulke Hans-Hermann, Van der Werf Wopke, Vicent Civera Antonio, Yuen Jonathan, Zappalà Lucia, Lucchi Andrea, Loomans Antoon, Mosbach-Schulz Olaf, de la Peña Eduardo, Milonas Panagiotis

出版信息

EFSA J. 2021 Feb 13;19(2):e06397. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6397. eCollection 2021 Feb.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6397
PMID:33613740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7881710/
Abstract

The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as 'High risk plants, plant products and other objects'. fruits originating from countries where is known to occur qualify as high-risk plants. This Scientific Opinion covers the introduction risk for posed by fruits of L. imported from Sri Lanka, taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by the National Plant Quarantine Service of Sri Lanka. The risk mitigation measures proposed in the technical dossier from Sri Lanka were evaluated taking into account the possible limiting factors. An expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom taking into consideration the potential pest pressure in the field, the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest in the field and in the packing house, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. For on fruits from Sri Lanka, an expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom following the evaluation of the risk mitigation measures acting on , including any uncertainties. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation indicated, with 95% certainty that between 9831 and 10,000 fruits/10,000 will be free from .

摘要

欧盟委员会要求欧洲食品安全局植物健康小组对委员会实施条例(欧盟)2018/2019中列为“高风险植物、植物产品及其他物品”的商品进行风险评估。已知存在[某种情况或有害生物]的国家所产水果属于高风险植物。本科学意见涵盖从斯里兰卡进口的[某种植物名称]L.水果所带来的[某种有害生物或情况]传入风险,同时考虑了现有科学信息,包括斯里兰卡国家植物检疫局提供的技术信息。对斯里兰卡技术文件中提出的风险缓解措施进行了评估,并考虑了可能的限制因素。在考虑田间潜在有害生物压力、田间及包装厂针对有害生物的风险缓解措施(包括评估中存在的不确定性)的情况下,对有害生物不存在的可能性给出了专家判断。对于来自斯里兰卡的[某种植物名称]水果上的[某种有害生物或情况],在评估针对[某种有害生物或情况]的风险缓解措施(包括任何不确定性)后,对有害生物不存在的可能性给出了专家判断。专家知识 elicitation表明,有95%的把握确定每10,000个[某种植物名称]水果中有9831至10,000个将不存在[某种有害生物或情况]。 (注:原文中部分关键信息缺失,用[某种情况或有害生物]、[某种植物名称]、elicitation等表示,实际翻译时需根据完整准确信息替换)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140a/7881710/54590358d8b5/EFS2-19-e06397-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140a/7881710/68378fe3776b/EFS2-19-e06397-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140a/7881710/267832b93076/EFS2-19-e06397-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140a/7881710/59f0c699d0f7/EFS2-19-e06397-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140a/7881710/5b1e660cedf0/EFS2-19-e06397-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140a/7881710/a143b11cfdb1/EFS2-19-e06397-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140a/7881710/54590358d8b5/EFS2-19-e06397-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140a/7881710/68378fe3776b/EFS2-19-e06397-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140a/7881710/267832b93076/EFS2-19-e06397-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140a/7881710/59f0c699d0f7/EFS2-19-e06397-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140a/7881710/5b1e660cedf0/EFS2-19-e06397-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140a/7881710/a143b11cfdb1/EFS2-19-e06397-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140a/7881710/54590358d8b5/EFS2-19-e06397-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Commodity risk assessment of fruits from Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡水果的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2021 Feb 13;19(2):e06397. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6397. eCollection 2021 Feb.
2
Commodity risk assessment of fruits from Thailand.泰国水果的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2021 Feb 13;19(2):e06399. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6399. eCollection 2021 Feb.
3
Commodity risk assessment of fruits from Honduras.洪都拉斯水果的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2021 Feb 13;19(2):e06395. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6395. eCollection 2021 Feb.
4
Commodity risk assessment of fruits from Mexico.墨西哥水果的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2021 Feb 13;19(2):e06398. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6398. eCollection 2021 Feb.
5
Commodity risk assessment of fruits from Suriname.苏里南水果的商品风险评估
EFSA J. 2021 Feb 13;19(2):e06396. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6396. eCollection 2021 Feb.
6
Commodity risk assessment of plants from .来自……的植物的商品风险评估
EFSA J. 2021 May 3;19(5):e06569. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6569. eCollection 2021 May.
7
Commodity risk assessment of plants from .来自……的植物的商品风险评估
EFSA J. 2021 May 4;19(5):e06568. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6568. eCollection 2021 May.
8
Commodity risk assessment of potted plants from Turkey.来自土耳其的盆栽植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2022 Jun 30;20(6):e07392. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7392. eCollection 2022 Jun.
9
Commodity risk assessment of grafted plants of from .来自……的嫁接植物的商品风险评估。 (原英文文本表述不完整,from后缺少具体内容)
EFSA J. 2022 Mar 25;20(3):e07201. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7201. eCollection 2022 Mar.
10
Commodity risk assessment of specified species of potted plants from .来自……的特定种类盆栽植物的商品风险评估
EFSA J. 2022 Jan 18;20(1):e07014. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7014. eCollection 2022 Jan.

引用本文的文献

1
Pest categorisation of .……的有害生物分类
EFSA J. 2023 Mar 31;21(3):e07899. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7899. eCollection 2023 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Variable resistance to spinetoram in populations of across a small area unconnected to genetic similarity.在一个与遗传相似性无关的小区域内,不同种群对多杀霉素的抗性存在差异。
Evol Appl. 2020 May 29;13(9):2234-2245. doi: 10.1111/eva.12996. eCollection 2020 Oct.
2
Guidance on commodity risk assessment for the evaluation of high risk plants dossiers.用于评估高风险植物档案的商品风险评估指南。
EFSA J. 2019 Apr 29;17(4):e05668. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5668. eCollection 2019 Apr.
3
Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment.有害生物定量风险评估指南。
EFSA J. 2018 Aug 3;16(8):e05350. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5350. eCollection 2018 Aug.
4
Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments.科学评估中的不确定性分析指南。
EFSA J. 2018 Jan 24;16(1):e05123. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5123. eCollection 2018 Jan.
5
Thrips Resistance Screening Is Coming of Age: Leaf Position and Ontogeny Are Important Determinants of Leaf-Based Resistance in Pepper.蓟马抗性筛选渐趋成熟:叶位和个体发育是辣椒叶片抗性的重要决定因素。
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Apr 24;10:510. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00510. eCollection 2019.
6
Effects of temperature on the development and population growth of the melon thrips, Thrips palmi, on eggplant, Solanum melongena.温度对茄子上西花蓟马发育和种群增长的影响
J Insect Sci. 2014 May 30;14:78. doi: 10.1093/jis/14.1.78.
7
Bagging treatment influences production of C6 aldehydes and biosynthesis-related gene expression in peach fruit skin.套袋处理影响桃果实表皮中C6醛类物质的产生及生物合成相关基因的表达。
Molecules. 2014 Aug 29;19(9):13461-72. doi: 10.3390/molecules190913461.
8
Identification of the aggregation pheromone of the melon thrips, Thrips palmi.瓜蓟马(西花蓟马)聚集信息素的鉴定
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 7;9(8):e103315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103315. eCollection 2014.
9
Can mass trapping reduce thrips damage and is it economically viable? Management of the Western flower thrips in strawberry.大规模诱捕能否减少蓟马的危害,并且在经济上可行?草莓上的西花蓟马管理。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 25;8(11):e80787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080787. eCollection 2013.
10
Sampling plan for Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on cucumber.黄瓜上蓟马(缨翅目:蓟马科)的抽样计划。
Neotrop Entomol. 2008 Sep-Oct;37(5):582-90. doi: 10.1590/s1519-566x2008000500014.