• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同眼轴长度的高度近视眼中三焦点人工晶状体植入后的视觉质量

Visual quality after implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses in highly myopic eyes with different axial lengths.

作者信息

Liu Hui, Li Fang-Fang, Xia Hai-Jun, Zhou Jin

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Chengdu Aier Eye Hospital, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.

Department of Ophthalmology, Chongqing Aier Eye Hospital, Chongqing 400020, China.

出版信息

Int J Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar 18;14(3):371-377. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.03.06. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.18240/ijo.2021.03.06
PMID:33747811
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7930543/
Abstract

AIM

To analyze postoperative clinical results after implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) in highly myopic eyes with different axial lengths (ALs).

METHODS

This retrospective study describes 61 eyes of 44 patients that were implanted with trifocal diffractive IOLs (AT LISA tri 839MP). Twenty-one eyes (15 patients) were included in the AL<26 mm group, 19 eyes (13 patients) in the AL≥26 mm and <28 mm group, and 21 eyes (16 patients) in the AL≥28 mm group. Postoperative outcomes, including corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), intermediate and near visual acuity at 167 cd/m luminance, depth of focus at 85 cd/m luminance, and objective optical quality parameters assessed using the Optical Quality Analysis System (OQAS), were compared among the groups at 3mo.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the mean UDVA, uncorrected intermediate visual acuity, uncorrected near visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity, and distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) among the three groups (>0.05). Better near and intermediate visual acuity (from -1.5 D to -3.0 D) were noted on the defocus curve of the AL<26 mm group (<0.01 AL≥28 mm group). Significantly higher objective scatter index (OSI) values and lower modulation transfer function (MTF) cut-off values, Strehl ratio (SR), and OQAS values (OVs) were observed in the AL≥28 mm group (<0.01 AL<26 mm group). All OQAS parameters had statistically significant correlations with DCNVA and visual acuity at the vergence of -2.5 D (<0.05 to <0.01).

CONCLUSION

Implantation of trifocal IOLs provides good short-term visual and refractive outcomes in highly myopic eyes with different ALs. However, the near vision decreases in the extremely myopic eyes at lower luminance, which is associated with the lower objective optical quality in these eyes.

摘要

目的

分析不同眼轴长度(AL)的高度近视眼植入三焦点人工晶状体(IOL)后的术后临床结果。

方法

这项回顾性研究描述了44例患者的61只眼,这些眼植入了三焦点衍射IOL(AT LISA tri 839MP)。眼轴长度<26mm组纳入21只眼(15例患者),眼轴长度≥26mm且<28mm组纳入19只眼(13例患者),眼轴长度≥28mm组纳入21只眼(16例患者)。比较3个月时各组的术后结果,包括矫正和未矫正远视力(UDVA)、167cd/m亮度下的中视力和近视力、85cd/m亮度下的焦深,以及使用光学质量分析系统(OQAS)评估的客观光学质量参数。

结果

三组之间的平均UDVA、未矫正中视力、未矫正近视力、矫正远视力、远距矫正中视力和远距矫正近视力(DCNVA)无显著差异(>0.05)。眼轴长度<26mm组的散焦曲线显示更好的近视力和中视力(从-1.5D到-3.0D)(<0.01,眼轴长度≥28mm组)。眼轴长度≥28mm组观察到显著更高的客观散射指数(OSI)值和更低的调制传递函数(MTF)截止值、斯特列尔比(SR)和OQAS值(OVs)(<0.01,眼轴长度<26mm组)。所有OQAS参数与DCNVA以及-2.5D聚散度下的视力均具有统计学显著相关性(<0.05至<0.01)。

结论

植入三焦点IOL在不同眼轴长度的高度近视眼中提供了良好的短期视觉和屈光结果。然而,在低亮度下,极高度近视眼的近视力下降,这与这些眼中较低的客观光学质量有关。

相似文献

1
Visual quality after implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses in highly myopic eyes with different axial lengths.不同眼轴长度的高度近视眼中三焦点人工晶状体植入后的视觉质量
Int J Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar 18;14(3):371-377. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.03.06. eCollection 2021.
2
Visual and patient-reported outcomes of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens in highly myopic eyes: a prospective multicenter study.高度近视眼中衍射型三焦点人工晶状体的视觉及患者报告结局:一项前瞻性多中心研究
Eye Vis (Lond). 2023 Apr 6;10(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40662-023-00336-3.
3
Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients with High Myopic Cataract after Implantation of AT LISA Tri 839MP and LS-313 MF30 Intraocular Lenses.AT LISA Tri 839MP和LS-313 MF30人工晶状体植入高度近视性白内障患者后的视觉效果及生活质量比较
J Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb 28;2022:5645752. doi: 10.1155/2022/5645752. eCollection 2022.
4
Analysis of visual quality improvement after implantation of PanOptix trifocal intraocular lens in cataract patients with different axial lengths.不同眼轴长度白内障患者植入PanOptix三焦点人工晶状体后视觉质量改善情况分析
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Jul 15;16(7):2995-3004. doi: 10.62347/FRJZ4885. eCollection 2024.
5
Myopic Shift after Implantation of a Novel Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens in Korean Eyes.新型衍射三焦点人工晶状体植入韩国人眼中后的近视漂移
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;32(1):16-22. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2017.0060. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
6
Early outcomes of vision and objective visual quality analysis after cataract surgery with trifocal intraocular lens implantation.三焦点人工晶状体植入白内障手术后的视力早期结果及客观视觉质量分析
Int J Ophthalmol. 2019 Oct 18;12(10):1575-1581. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2019.10.09. eCollection 2019.
7
Visual Performance With Bifocal and Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses: A Prospective Three-Armed Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial.双焦点和三焦点衍射型人工晶状体的视觉性能:一项前瞻性三臂随机多中心临床试验。
J Refract Surg. 2017 Oct 1;33(10):655-662. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170504-04.
8
Comparison of the Visual Performance After Implantation of Bifocal and Trifocal Intraocular Lenses Having an Identical Platform.相同平台的双焦点和三焦点人工晶状体植入术后视觉性能比较
J Refract Surg. 2018 Apr 1;34(4):273-280. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180214-01.
9
Effectivity and safety of trifocal intraocular lenses and capsular tension rings implantation for cataract patients with axial high myopia.三焦点人工晶状体联合囊袋张力环植入治疗高度轴性近视白内障患者的有效性和安全性
Int J Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 18;17(3):499-508. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.03.12. eCollection 2024.
10
Comparative analysis of visual outcomes, reading skills, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction with two models of trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses and an extended range of vision intraocular lens.两种三焦点衍射人工晶状体和一种扩展视力范围人工晶状体在视觉效果、阅读技能、对比敏感度及患者满意度方面的比较分析
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct;256(10):1913-1922. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4052-3. Epub 2018 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual effects of trifocal intraocular lens implantation in cataract patients with different refractive states.三焦点人工晶状体植入术对不同屈光状态白内障患者的视觉效果
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 12;25(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-03963-7.
2
Changes in visual performance after implantation of different intraocular lenses.不同人工晶状体植入术后视觉性能的变化。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 18;17(7):1273-1282. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.07.12. eCollection 2024.
3
Effectivity and safety of trifocal intraocular lenses and capsular tension rings implantation for cataract patients with axial high myopia.三焦点人工晶状体联合囊袋张力环植入治疗高度轴性近视白内障患者的有效性和安全性
Int J Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 18;17(3):499-508. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.03.12. eCollection 2024.
4
Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens with phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery.衍射型三焦点人工晶状体与白内障超声乳化吸除术及飞秒激光辅助白内障手术的短期临床结果比较
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr 24;24(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03440-7.
5
Comparison of visual performance with iTrace analyzer following femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of two different trifocal intraocular lenses.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术后双侧植入两种不同三焦点人工晶状体后,使用iTrace分析仪进行视觉性能比较。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov 18;16(11):1773-1781. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.11.06. eCollection 2023.
6
Visual and patient-reported outcomes of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens in highly myopic eyes: a prospective multicenter study.高度近视眼中衍射型三焦点人工晶状体的视觉及患者报告结局:一项前瞻性多中心研究
Eye Vis (Lond). 2023 Apr 6;10(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40662-023-00336-3.
7
Application of total keratometry in ten intraocular lens power calculation formulas in highly myopic eyes.全角膜曲率计在高度近视眼十种人工晶状体屈光力计算公式中的应用
Eye Vis (Lond). 2022 Jun 9;9(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40662-022-00293-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Spectacle Independence After Cataract Surgery: A Prospective Study With a Multifocal Intraocular Lens.白内障手术后摆脱眼镜依赖:一项使用多焦点人工晶状体的前瞻性研究。
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2020;9(1):38-46. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
2
Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with extreme myopia: Comparison of Barrett Universal II, Haigis, and Olsen formulas.高度近视眼的人工晶状体度数计算:Barrett Universal II、Haigis 和 Olsen 公式的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Jun;45(6):732-737. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.025. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
3
Visual results after implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens in high myopes.高度近视患者植入三焦点人工晶状体的视觉效果。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Jun;44(6):680-685. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.04.037. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
4
Ocular biometric characteristics of cataract patients in western China.中国西部白内障患者的眼部生物特征
BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr 17;18(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0770-x.
5
Comparison of the Visual Performance After Implantation of Bifocal and Trifocal Intraocular Lenses Having an Identical Platform.相同平台的双焦点和三焦点人工晶状体植入术后视觉性能比较
J Refract Surg. 2018 Apr 1;34(4):273-280. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180214-01.
6
Evaluation of Optical Quality: Ocular Scattering and Aberrations in Eyes Implanted with Diffractive Multifocal or Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.光学质量评估:植入衍射多焦点或单焦点人工晶状体的眼睛中的眼内散射和像差
Curr Eye Res. 2018 Jun;43(6):696-701. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1449220. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
7
Comparison of clinical performance between trifocal and bifocal intraocular lenses: A meta-analysis.三焦点与双焦点人工晶状体的临床性能比较:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 26;12(10):e0186522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186522. eCollection 2017.
8
The Distinct Biometric Features of High Myopia Compared to Moderate Myopia.高度近视与中度近视相比的独特生物特征。
Curr Eye Res. 2016 Dec;41(12):1580-1583. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1130229. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
9
Comparison of ocular straylight after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses.比较多焦点人工晶状体植入术后的眼内散光。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Apr;42(4):618-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.02.022.
10
Evaluation of visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens.衍射型三焦点人工晶状体植入术后视觉效果及患者满意度评估
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Feb;42(2):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.11.037.