Suppr超能文献

基于基因工程的基因功能鉴定方法会被植物基因组编辑所取代吗?方法比较。

Can genetic engineering-based methods for gene function identification be eclipsed by genome editing in plants? A comparison of methodologies.

机构信息

Department of Plant Science, Central University of Kerala, Periya, Kasaragod, Kerala, 671320, India.

出版信息

Mol Genet Genomics. 2021 May;296(3):485-500. doi: 10.1007/s00438-021-01769-y. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

Abstract

Finding and explaining the functions of genes in plants have promising applications in crop improvement and bioprospecting and hence, it is important to compare various techniques available for gene function identification in plants. Today, the most popular technology among researchers to identify the functions of genes is the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR associated protein 9 (Cas9)-based genome editing method. But by no means can we say that CRISPR/Cas9 is the go-to method for all purposes. It comes with its own baggage. Researchers will agree and have lived through at least seven more technologies deployed to find the functions of genes, which come under three umbrellas: 1. genetic engineering, 2. transient expression, and 3. chemical/physical mutagenesis. Each of the methods evolved when the previous one ran into an insurmountable problem. In this review, we compare the eight technologies against one another on 14 parameters. This review lays bare the pros and cons, and similarities and dissimilarities of various methods. Every method comes with its advantages and disadvantages. For example, the CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing is an excellent method for modifying gene sequences, creating allelic versions of genes, thereby aiding the understanding of gene function. But it comes with the baggage of unwanted or off-target mutations. Then, we have methods based on random or targeted knockout of the gene, knockdown, and overexpression of the gene. Targeted disruption of genes is required for complete knockout of gene function, which may not be accomplished by editing. We have also discussed the strategies to overcome the shortcomings of the targeted gene-knockout and the CRISPR/Cas9-based methods. This review serves as a comprehensive guide towards the understanding and comparison of various technologies available for gene function identification in plants and hence, it will find application for crop improvement and bioprospecting related research.

摘要

在植物中发现和解释基因的功能在作物改良和生物勘探方面具有广阔的应用前景,因此,比较植物中各种基因功能鉴定技术非常重要。如今,研究人员识别基因功能最流行的技术是基于成簇的、规律间隔的短回文重复序列(CRISPR)/CRISPR 相关蛋白 9(Cas9)的基因组编辑方法。但决不能说 CRISPR/Cas9 是所有目的的首选方法。它有其自身的问题。研究人员会同意,并且至少经历了另外七种用于发现基因功能的技术,这些技术分为三个方面:1. 基因工程,2. 瞬时表达,和 3. 化学/物理诱变。每种方法都是在前一种方法遇到无法克服的问题时发展起来的。在这篇综述中,我们将这 8 种方法在 14 个参数上进行了比较。这篇综述揭示了各种方法的优缺点和异同。每种方法都有其优点和缺点。例如,基于 CRISPR/Cas9 的基因组编辑是一种极好的基因序列修饰方法,它可以创建基因的等位基因版本,从而有助于理解基因功能。但它也存在非预期或脱靶突变的问题。然后,我们还有基于基因随机或靶向敲除、基因敲低和过表达的方法。要完全敲除基因功能,需要靶向破坏基因,而编辑方法可能无法实现。我们还讨论了克服靶向基因敲除和 CRISPR/Cas9 方法缺点的策略。这篇综述是一份全面的指南,用于理解和比较植物中基因功能鉴定的各种技术,因此它将在作物改良和生物勘探相关研究中得到应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验