Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Oct;33(10):2787-2795. doi: 10.1007/s40520-021-01788-0. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
Effects of fatigue on health in older age are well studied, yet little is known about the clinical relevance of energy perception.
To explore cross-sectional associations of self-reported energy with physical and mental health metrics in the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study.
Participants rated their energy from 0 to 10; the outcome was energy dichotomized at the median (≥ 7 = higher energy). Four domains were assessed: depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale); physical performance (function: usual and rapid gait speed; fitness: 400-m walk time); physical activity (casual walking, walking for exercise, and intense exercise); and cognitive function (Modified Mini-Mental State Examination and Digit Symbol Substitution Test). Covariates bivariately associated with energy entered a multivariable logistic regression model, adjusted for demographics, chronic conditions, and strength.
Depressive symptoms, physical performance and activity, but not cognition, were bivariately associated with energy (p < 0.0005). Younger age, male sex, greater strength, and absence of chronic conditions predicted higher energy (p < 0.001). In a multivariable model, depressive symptoms [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 95% CI 0.69 (0.62, 0.76)] and 400-m walk times [aOR = 0.81 (0.72, 0.91)] were inversely associated with energy; usual and rapid gait speed [aOR = 1.3 (1.2, 1.4); aOR = 1.2 (1.1-1.4)], and time spent in intense exercise [aOR = 1.4 (1.1-1.7)] were positively associated with energy.
In this cohort with a range of chronic conditions and fatigue, perceiving higher energy levels may reflect better emotional and physical health.
Energy should be considered in multidimensional clinical assessments of older age.
疲劳对老年人健康的影响已得到充分研究,但人们对能量感知的临床相关性知之甚少。
探讨健康、衰老和身体成分研究中自我报告的能量与身心健康指标的横断面关联。
参与者从 0 到 10 分对自己的能量进行评分;结果以中位数(≥7=更高能量)进行二分法。评估了四个领域:抑郁症状(流行病学研究中心抑郁量表);身体表现(功能:常规和快速步行速度;体能:400 米步行时间);身体活动(日常散步、锻炼性散步和剧烈运动);认知功能(改良简易精神状态检查和数字符号替代测试)。与能量有双变量关联的协变量进入多变量逻辑回归模型,调整了人口统计学、慢性疾病和力量因素。
抑郁症状、身体表现和活动,但不是认知,与能量有双变量关联(p<0.0005)。年龄较小、男性、更强的力量和没有慢性疾病预测更高的能量(p<0.001)。在多变量模型中,抑郁症状[调整后的优势比(95%置信区间)0.69(0.62,0.76)]和 400 米步行时间[调整后的优势比=0.81(0.72,0.91)]与能量呈负相关;常规和快速步行速度[调整后的优势比=1.3(1.2,1.4);调整后的优势比=1.2(1.1-1.4)]和剧烈运动时间[调整后的优势比=1.4(1.1-1.7)]与能量呈正相关。
在这个患有一系列慢性疾病和疲劳的队列中,感知更高的能量水平可能反映出更好的情绪和身体健康。
在对老年人进行多维临床评估时,应考虑能量因素。