Martin-Carbonell M, Sequeira-Daza D, Checa I, Domenech J, Espejo B, Castro-Melo G
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Colombia.
Universidad Central de Chile, Chile.
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 15;10(14):e34652. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34652. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
Chronic back pain is a frequent and disabling health problem. There is evidence that ignorance and erroneous beliefs about chronic low back pain among health professionals interfere in the treatment of people who suffer from it. The Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS) has been one of the most used scale to assess these misbeliefs, but no studies have been reported in Latin America. Method: We studied the factorial structure of the HC-PAIRS in health personnel and health sciences university students in two Latin American countries: Colombia (n = 930) and Chile (n = 190). Spain's data was taken of the original study of the Spanish version of the HC-PAIRS (171 Physiotherapy students). Additionally, the measurement invariance of this scale among Chile, Colombia and Spain was evaluated by calculating three nested models: configural, metric and scalar. We used a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in both Latin American samples, with Maximum Likelihood Robust (MLR) estimation to estimate the parameters. For the final model in each sample, reliability was assessed with the Composite Reliability (CR) index, and to obtain the proportion of variance explained by the scale the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) was calculated.
The one-factor solution shows an acceptable fit in both countries after deleting items 1, 6, and 14. For the resulting scale, the CR value is adequate, but the AVE is low. There is scalar invariance between Chile and Colombia, but not between these two countries and Spain.
HC-PAIRS is useful for detecting misconceptions about the relationship between chronic low back pain that would cause health personnel to give wrong recommendations to patients. However, it has psychometric weaknesses, and it is advisable to obtain other evidence of validity.
慢性背痛是一个常见且使人致残的健康问题。有证据表明,医疗专业人员对慢性下背痛的无知和错误认知会干扰对患者的治疗。医疗服务提供者疼痛与功能障碍关系量表(HC - PAIRS)一直是评估这些错误认知最常用的量表之一,但拉丁美洲尚未有相关研究报道。方法:我们在两个拉丁美洲国家(哥伦比亚,n = 930;智利,n = 190)的卫生人员和健康科学专业大学生中研究了HC - PAIRS的因子结构。西班牙的数据取自HC - PAIRS西班牙语版的原始研究(171名物理治疗专业学生)。此外,通过计算三个嵌套模型(构型、度量和标量模型)评估了该量表在智利、哥伦比亚和西班牙之间的测量不变性。我们在两个拉丁美洲样本中均使用了验证性因子分析(CFA),采用稳健最大似然估计(MLR)来估计参数。对于每个样本中的最终模型,使用组合信度(CR)指数评估信度,并通过计算平均方差抽取量(AVE)来获得量表解释的方差比例。
在删除项目1、6和14后,单因素解决方案在两个国家均显示出可接受的拟合度。对于最终量表,CR值足够,但AVE较低。智利和哥伦比亚之间存在标量不变性,但这两个国家与西班牙之间不存在。
HC - PAIRS有助于检测关于慢性下背痛关系的误解,这些误解可能导致卫生人员向患者给出错误建议。然而,它存在心理测量学上的弱点,建议获取其他效度证据。