Division of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Jane & Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90024.
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University.
J Affect Disord. 2021 May 1;286:282-295. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.053. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
Parent- and family-level correlates of youth anxiety are well-documented, and they highlight potential targets for family-focused intervention. Although family-based approaches for treating youth anxiety generally are considered efficacious for achieving symptom reduction, they vary in format and approach and it remains unclear whether they offer an advantage over individual child treatment. To better understand the current state of the evidence, we used meta-analytic methods to examine the therapeutic approaches described in existing family interventions for child and adolescent anxiety, whether they mapped to the major mechanisms proposed in the literature, and the timeline along which relevant parent/family variables were measured. We examined how these mechanism-focused family interventions performed in RCTs relative to individual child CBT and whether they shifted symptoms and relevant parenting behaviors. A total of 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared individual cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) to CBT+ a family component (CBT + FAM) and included a youth anxiety measure at pre- and post-treatment; only half of these (n=6) also included a parent/family functioning measure at both pre- and post-treatment (across both primary and secondary outcome papers). Only a single study included anxiety measures at a mid-treatment time point, and none included parent measures at a mid-treatment time point. Findings are discussed in terms of design considerations and advancing the field of family intervention for youth anxiety.
父母和家庭层面与青少年焦虑相关的因素已有充分记录,并强调了以家庭为中心的干预的潜在目标。虽然针对青少年焦虑的基于家庭的治疗方法通常被认为对减轻症状有效,但它们在形式和方法上存在差异,目前尚不清楚它们是否比儿童个体治疗更有优势。为了更好地了解现有证据的状况,我们使用荟萃分析方法来检查现有儿童和青少年焦虑症家庭干预中描述的治疗方法,这些方法是否与文献中提出的主要机制相对应,以及相关父母/家庭变量的测量时间线。我们研究了这些以机制为重点的家庭干预在 RCT 中相对于儿童个体认知行为疗法(CBT)的表现,以及它们是否改变了症状和相关的育儿行为。共有 11 项随机对照试验(RCT)将个体认知行为疗法(CBT)与 CBT+家庭组成部分(CBT+FAM)进行了比较,并在治疗前后都包含了青少年焦虑测量;其中只有一半(n=6)在治疗前后都包含了父母/家庭功能测量(在主要和次要结果论文中)。只有一项研究在治疗中期包含了焦虑测量,没有一项研究在治疗中期包含了父母测量。研究结果从设计考虑和推进青少年焦虑家庭干预领域的角度进行了讨论。