• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经连接亚型可预测异质性焦虑症患者中不同的注意力偏差特征。

Neural Connectivity Subtypes Predict Discrete Attentional Bias Profiles Among Heterogeneous Anxiety Patients.

作者信息

Price Rebecca B, Beltz Adriene M, Woody Mary L, Cummings Logan, Gilchrist Danielle, Siegle Greg J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.

Department of Psychology, University of Michigan.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Sci. 2020 May 1;8(3):491-505. doi: 10.1177/2167702620906149. Epub 2020 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1177/2167702620906149
PMID:33758682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7983837/
Abstract

On average, anxious patients show altered attention to threat-including early vigilance towards threat and later avoidance of threat-accompanied by altered functional connectivity across brain regions. However, substantial heterogeneity within clinical, neural, and attentional features of anxiety is overlooked in typical group-level comparisons. We used a well-validated method for data-driven parsing of neural connectivity to reveal connectivity-based subgroups among 60 adults with transdiagnostic anxiety. Subgroups were externally compared on attentional patterns derived from independent behavioral measures. Two subgroups emerged. Subgroup A (68% of patients) showed stronger executive network influences on sensory processing regions and a paradigmatic "vigilance-avoidance" pattern on external behavioral measures. Subgroup B was defined by a larger number of limbic influences on sensory regions and exhibited a more atypical and inconsistent attentional profile. Neural connectivity-based categorization revealed an atypical, limbic-driven pattern of connectivity in a subset of anxious patients that generalized to atypical patterns of selective attention.

摘要

平均而言,焦虑患者对威胁的注意力表现出改变,包括早期对威胁的警觉和后期对威胁的回避,同时大脑区域间的功能连接也发生改变。然而,在典型的组间比较中,焦虑症在临床、神经和注意力特征方面的显著异质性被忽视了。我们使用一种经过充分验证的数据驱动方法来解析神经连接,以揭示60名患有跨诊断焦虑症的成年人中基于连接性的亚组。通过独立行为测量得出的注意力模式对这些亚组进行外部比较。出现了两个亚组。A组(68%的患者)对感觉处理区域表现出更强的执行网络影响,并且在外部行为测量中呈现出典型的“警觉-回避”模式。B组的定义是边缘系统对感觉区域的影响更大,并且表现出更不典型和不一致的注意力特征。基于神经连接的分类揭示了一部分焦虑患者中存在非典型的、由边缘系统驱动的连接模式,这种模式普遍存在于选择性注意力的非典型模式中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fc7/7983837/a512563d64ba/nihms-1551478-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fc7/7983837/b1d209e3f97d/nihms-1551478-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fc7/7983837/a512563d64ba/nihms-1551478-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fc7/7983837/b1d209e3f97d/nihms-1551478-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fc7/7983837/a512563d64ba/nihms-1551478-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Neural Connectivity Subtypes Predict Discrete Attentional Bias Profiles Among Heterogeneous Anxiety Patients.神经连接亚型可预测异质性焦虑症患者中不同的注意力偏差特征。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2020 May 1;8(3):491-505. doi: 10.1177/2167702620906149. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
2
Data-Driven Subgroups in Depression Derived from Directed Functional Connectivity Paths at Rest.基于静息态定向功能连接路径的抑郁症数据驱动亚组研究。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017 Dec;42(13):2623-2632. doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.97. Epub 2017 May 12.
3
Parsing Heterogeneity in the Brain Connectivity of Depressed and Healthy Adults During Positive Mood.解析抑郁和健康成年人在积极情绪状态下大脑连通性的异质性
Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 15;81(4):347-357. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.06.023. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
4
Vigilance in the laboratory predicts avoidance in the real world: A dimensional analysis of neural, behavioral, and ecological momentary data in anxious youth.实验室中的警觉性可预测现实世界中的回避行为:对焦虑青少年的神经、行为和生态瞬时数据的维度分析。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jun;19:128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
5
Resting state functional connectivity subtypes predict discrete patterns of cognitive-affective functioning across levels of analysis among patients with treatment-resistant depression.静息态功能连接亚型可预测治疗抵抗性抑郁症患者在不同分析水平上的认知情感功能离散模式。
Behav Res Ther. 2021 Nov;146:103960. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2021.103960. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
6
Looking under the hood of the dot-probe task: an fMRI study in anxious youth.探究点探测任务的本质:一项针对焦虑青少年的功能磁共振成像研究
Depress Anxiety. 2014 Mar;31(3):178-87. doi: 10.1002/da.22255. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
7
What does the facial dot-probe task tell us about attentional processes in social anxiety? A systematic review.面部点探测任务能告诉我们关于社交焦虑中注意力过程的哪些信息?一项系统综述。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;50:40-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.04.009. Epub 2015 May 12.
8
Stratification of MDD and GAD patients by resting state brain connectivity predicts cognitive bias.根据静息态大脑连接对 MDD 和 GAD 患者进行分层可预测认知偏差。
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Apr 30;19:425-433. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.04.033. eCollection 2018.
9
Time course of attentional bias in social anxiety: The effects of spatial frequencies and individual threats.社交焦虑中注意力偏向的时程变化:空间频率和个体威胁的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2020 Sep;57(9):e13617. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13617. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
10
Health anxiety and attentional bias: the time course of vigilance and avoidance in light of pictorial illness information.健康焦虑与注意偏向:基于图片式疾病信息的警觉与回避的时程变化。
J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Dec;25(8):1131-8. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Smartphone-Delivered Attentional Bias Modification Training for Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.智能手机为媒介的注意力偏向修正训练在精神健康方面的应用:系统综述和荟萃分析。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Sep 2;11:e56326. doi: 10.2196/56326.
2
Sources of Heterogeneity in Functional Connectivity During English Word Processing in Bilingual and Monolingual Children.双语和单语儿童在英语单词处理过程中功能连接的异质性来源
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2023 Apr 11;4(2):198-220. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00092. eCollection 2023.
3
Associations between resting-state neural connectivity and positive affect in social anxiety disorder.

本文引用的文献

1
Pinpointing mechanisms of a mechanistic treatment: Dissociable roles for overt and covert attentional processes in acute and long-term outcomes following Attention Bias Modification.确定一种机械性治疗的机制:在注意力偏差修正后的急性和长期结果中,外显和内隐注意过程的不同作用。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2019 Sep;7(5):1042-1062. doi: 10.1177/2167702619842556. Epub 2019 May 14.
2
A meta-analysis of bias at baseline in RCTs of attention bias modification: No evidence for dot-probe bias towards threat in clinical anxiety and PTSD.注意偏向修改的 RCT 中基线偏倚的荟萃分析:临床焦虑和 PTSD 中没有指向威胁的点探测偏向的证据。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2019 Aug;128(6):563-573. doi: 10.1037/abn0000406.
3
社交焦虑障碍患者静息态神经连接与正性情绪的相关性。
Brain Behav. 2023 Jun;13(6):e3006. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3006. Epub 2023 Apr 16.
4
Intrauterine Device Use: A New Frontier for Behavioral Neuroendocrinology.宫内节育器的使用:行为神经内分泌学的新前沿。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 22;13:853714. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.853714. eCollection 2022.
5
Person-specific connectivity mapping uncovers differences of bilingual language experience on brain bases of attention in children.个体特定连接图揭示了双语语言经验对儿童注意力大脑基础的影响差异。
Brain Lang. 2022 Apr;227:105084. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105084. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
6
Neural heterogeneity underlying late adolescent motivational processing is linked to individual differences in behavioral sensation seeking.青少年晚期动机加工的神经异质性与行为感觉寻求的个体差异有关。
J Neurosci Res. 2022 Mar;100(3):762-779. doi: 10.1002/jnr.25005. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
7
Individualizing Representational Similarity Analysis.个性化表征相似性分析
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 11;12:729457. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.729457. eCollection 2021.
8
Cortical and subcortical brain structure in generalized anxiety disorder: findings from 28 research sites in the ENIGMA-Anxiety Working Group.广泛性焦虑障碍的皮质和皮质下脑结构:来自 ENIGMA-焦虑工作组 28 个研究地点的发现。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 1;11(1):502. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01622-1.
9
Resting state functional connectivity subtypes predict discrete patterns of cognitive-affective functioning across levels of analysis among patients with treatment-resistant depression.静息态功能连接亚型可预测治疗抵抗性抑郁症患者在不同分析水平上的认知情感功能离散模式。
Behav Res Ther. 2021 Nov;146:103960. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2021.103960. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
10
Resting-state connectivity subtype of comorbid PTSD and alcohol use disorder moderates improvement from integrated prolonged exposure therapy in Veterans.共病创伤后应激障碍和酒精使用障碍的静息状态连接亚型调节退伍军人接受整合性延长暴露治疗的改善。
Psychol Med. 2023 Jan;53(2):332-341. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001513. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
An integrative review of the vigilance-avoidance model in pediatric anxiety disorders: Are we looking in the wrong place?
儿童焦虑障碍警觉回避模型的综合述评:我们是否找错了地方?
J Anxiety Disord. 2019 May;64:79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
4
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Executive Functioning Training Compared With Perceptual Training for Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: Effects on Neurophysiology, Neurocognition, and Functioning.一项比较执行功能训练与精神分裂谱系障碍知觉训练的随机对照试验:对神经生理学、神经认知和功能的影响。
Am J Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 1;176(4):297-306. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18070849. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
5
Leveraging Neuroplasticity to Enhance Adaptive Learning: The Potential for Synergistic Somatic-Behavioral Treatment Combinations to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Depression.利用神经可塑性增强适应性学习:协同躯体-行为治疗联合改善抑郁症临床疗效的潜力。
Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 15;85(6):454-465. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
6
Towards personalized, brain-based behavioral intervention for transdiagnostic anxiety: Transient neural responses to negative images predict outcomes following a targeted computer-based intervention.针对跨诊断焦虑的个性化、基于大脑的行为干预:对负性图像的短暂神经反应可预测靶向计算机干预后的结果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Dec;86(12):1031-1045. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000309.
7
Computational Modeling Applied to the Dot-Probe Task Yields Improved Reliability and Mechanistic Insights.计算建模应用于点探测任务可提高可靠性和机制见解。
Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 1;85(7):606-612. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
8
Using person-specific neural networks to characterize heterogeneity in eating disorders: Illustrative links between emotional eating and ovarian hormones.利用个体特定的神经网络来描述进食障碍的异质性:情绪性进食与卵巢激素之间的关联。
Int J Eat Disord. 2018 Jul;51(7):730-740. doi: 10.1002/eat.22902. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
9
Uncovering general, shared, and unique temporal patterns in ambulatory assessment data.揭示门诊评估数据中的一般、共享和独特的时间模式。
Psychol Methods. 2019 Feb;24(1):54-69. doi: 10.1037/met0000192. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
10
Attentional bias for threat: Crisis or opportunity?注意偏向威胁:危机还是机遇?
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Apr;69:4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 May 21.