Münger Marionna, Candrian Gian, Kasper Johannes, Abdel-Rehim Hossam, Eich Dominique, Müller Andreas, Jäncke Lutz
University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
399140Brain and Trauma Foundation Grisons, Chur, Switzerland.
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2021 Sep;52(5):311-320. doi: 10.1177/1550059421993340. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
This study aimed to re-evaluate the possible differences between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) subjects and healthy controls in the context of a standard Go/NoGo task (visual continuous performance test [VCPT]), frequently used to measure executive functions. In contrast to many previous studies, our sample comprises children, adolescents, and adults. We analyzed data from 447 ADHD patients and 227 healthy controls. By applying multivariate linear regression analyses, we controlled the group differences between ADHD patients and controls for age and sex. As dependent variables we used behavioral (number of omission and commission errors, reaction time, and reaction time variability) and neurophysiological measures (event-related potentials [ERPs]). In summary, we successfully replicated the deviations of ADHD subjects from healthy controls. The differences are small to moderate when expressed as effect size measures (number of omission errors: = 0.60, reaction time variability: = 0.56, contingent negative variation (CNV) and P3 amplitudes: -0.35 < < -0.47, ERP latencies: 0.21 < < 0.29). Further analyses revealed no substantial differences between ADHD subtypes (combined, inattentive, and hyperactive/impulsive presentation), subgroups according to high- and low-symptomatic burden or methylphenidate intake for their daily routine. We successfully replicated known differences between ADHD subjects and controls for the behavioral and neurophysiological variables. However, the small-to-moderate effect sizes limit their utility as biomarkers in the diagnostic procedure. The incongruence of self-reported symptomatic burden and clinical diagnosis emphasizes the challenges of the present clinical diagnosis with low reliability, which partially accounts for the low degree of discrimination between ADHD subjects and controls.
本研究旨在重新评估注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)患者与健康对照者在标准的“是/否”任务(视觉持续操作测试[VCPT])中的可能差异,该任务常用于测量执行功能。与之前的许多研究不同,我们的样本包括儿童、青少年和成年人。我们分析了447名ADHD患者和227名健康对照者的数据。通过应用多元线性回归分析,我们控制了ADHD患者与对照者在年龄和性别上的组间差异。作为因变量,我们使用了行为指标(遗漏错误和执行错误的数量、反应时间以及反应时间变异性)和神经生理学指标(事件相关电位[ERP])。总之,我们成功复制了ADHD患者与健康对照者之间的偏差。以效应量衡量时,差异较小到中等(遗漏错误数量:=0.60,反应时间变异性:=0.56,关联性负变(CNV)和P3波幅:-0.35<<-0.47,ERP潜伏期:0.21<<0.29)。进一步分析显示,ADHD亚型(综合型、注意力不集中型和多动/冲动型表现)、根据症状负担高低划分的亚组或日常服用哌甲酯情况之间没有实质性差异。我们成功复制了ADHD患者与对照者在行为和神经生理学变量方面的已知差异。然而,较小到中等的效应量限制了它们作为生物标志物在诊断过程中的效用。自我报告的症状负担与临床诊断不一致,凸显了当前临床诊断可靠性低的挑战,这部分解释了ADHD患者与对照者之间区分度低的原因。