• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The PCOC Symptom Assessment Scale (SAS): A valid measure for daily use at point of care and in palliative care programs.PCOC 症状评估量表(SAS):一种在护理点和姑息治疗计划中日常使用的有效测量工具。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 25;16(3):e0247250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247250. eCollection 2021.
2
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of point-of-care outcome assessment tools in Chinese palliative care clinical practice.中文姑息治疗临床中即时护理结局评估工具的跨文化调适和心理测量学验证。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Apr 3;23(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01395-6.
3
Did the Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC) program lead to improved end-of-life care quality and reduced non-beneficial treatments?姑息治疗结局协作组织(PCOC)项目是否改善了临终关怀质量并减少了无益治疗?
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Aug 6;32(9):574. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08771-1.
4
Evaluation of the palliative symptom burden score (PSBS) in a specialised palliative care unit of a university medical centre - a longitudinal study.评价大学医学中心专科姑息治疗病房的姑息症状负担评分(PSBS)-一项纵向研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Jul 7;17(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0342-0.
5
The Australian Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC)--measuring the quality and outcomes of palliative care on a routine basis.澳大利亚姑息治疗结果协作组织(PCOC)——定期衡量姑息治疗的质量和结果。
Aust Health Rev. 2010 May;34(2):186-92. doi: 10.1071/AH08718.
6
Psychometric properties of the Czech Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale: reliability and content validity analysis.捷克综合姑息治疗结局量表的心理测量学特性:信度和内容效度分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Mar 25;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00552-x.
7
The multinomial mixed-effect regression model for predicting PCOC phases in hospice patients.预测临终关怀患者 PCOC 阶段的多项混合效应回归模型。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Sep 2;32(9):624. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08832-5.
8
The experience of Australian aged care workers during a trial implementation of a palliative care outcomes programme.澳大利亚老年护理工作者在试行姑息治疗结果计划期间的体验。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2024 Mar;39(2):380-396. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3731. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
9
A brief, patient- and proxy-reported outcome measure in advanced illness: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS).一种简明的、针对晚期疾病患者及其代理人的结局测量工具:综合性姑息治疗结局量表(IPOS)的有效性、信度和反应度。
Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;33(8):1045-1057. doi: 10.1177/0269216319854264. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
10
Validation and cultural adaptation of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) for the Portuguese population.验证和文化适应综合姑息治疗结局量表(IPOS)在葡萄牙人群中的应用。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Nov 24;19(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00685-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning model for prediction of palliative care phases in patients with advanced cancer: a retrospective study.用于预测晚期癌症患者姑息治疗阶段的机器学习模型:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 May 24;24(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01785-4.
2
Palliative care burden and specialist service utilisation for individuals with cardiovascular disease in Australia: a national population-based observational study.澳大利亚心血管疾病患者的姑息治疗负担及专科服务利用情况:一项基于全国人口的观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 May 22;15(5):e096435. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096435.
3
Navigating pain and appetite challenges in palliative care for pancreatic cancer: insights from a national, longitudinal consecutive cohort study.应对胰腺癌姑息治疗中的疼痛和食欲挑战:一项全国性纵向连续队列研究的见解
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Apr 8;33(5):365. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09402-z.
4
Is the use of antibiotic stewardship measures in the context of specialized outpatient palliative care sensible and feasible? An interview-based study.在专科门诊姑息治疗背景下使用抗生素管理措施是否合理且可行?一项基于访谈的研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 7;23(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01609-x.
5
Validating performance status and activities of daily living assessment tools for Chinese palliative care in a cancer setting: A cross-cultural psychometric study.验证癌症背景下中国姑息治疗中表现状态和日常生活活动评估工具:一项跨文化心理测量研究。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Oct 29;11(12):100613. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100613. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Changes in perceived distress among patients receiving inpatient palliative care.接受住院姑息治疗的患者感知痛苦的变化。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Nov 25;32(12):820. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-09033-w.
7
Symptom- and function-based trajectories of patients with dementia in hospital and community palliative care settings in the last two weeks of life: a retrospective cohort study.在生命的最后两周,医院和社区姑息治疗环境中痴呆症患者的基于症状和功能的轨迹:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Oct 21;23(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01565-6.
8
Characteristics of people diagnosed with dementia vs lung cancer and cardiovascular disease at commencement of community palliative care: a population-based study.被诊断为痴呆症与肺癌和心血管疾病的人群在社区姑息治疗开始时的特征:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Sep 4;23(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01545-w.
9
The multinomial mixed-effect regression model for predicting PCOC phases in hospice patients.预测临终关怀患者 PCOC 阶段的多项混合效应回归模型。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Sep 2;32(9):624. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08832-5.
10
Study protocol - assessing parkrun for walking rehabilitation for people living with, and beyond, cancer: acceptability, adherence, social support and physical function.研究方案——评估“公园跑”对癌症患者及康复者步行康复的作用:可接受性、依从性、社会支持和身体功能
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Apr 19;16(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00882-w.

本文引用的文献

1
A brief, patient- and proxy-reported outcome measure in advanced illness: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS).一种简明的、针对晚期疾病患者及其代理人的结局测量工具:综合性姑息治疗结局量表(IPOS)的有效性、信度和反应度。
Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;33(8):1045-1057. doi: 10.1177/0269216319854264. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
2
The escalating global burden of serious health-related suffering: projections to 2060 by world regions, age groups, and health conditions.全球严重健康相关痛苦负担不断加剧:按世界区域、年龄组和健康状况预测到 2060 年的情况。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jul;7(7):e883-e892. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30172-X. Epub 2019 May 22.
3
Palliative Care Problem Severity Score: Reliability and acceptability in a national study.姑息治疗问题严重程度评分:一项全国性研究中的可靠性和可接受性
Palliat Med. 2016 May;30(5):479-85. doi: 10.1177/0269216315613904. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
4
Palliative Care Phase: inter-rater reliability and acceptability in a national study.姑息治疗阶段:一项全国性研究中的评分者间信度与可接受性
Palliat Med. 2015 Jan;29(1):22-30. doi: 10.1177/0269216314551814. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
5
Improving national hospice/palliative care service symptom outcomes systematically through point-of-care data collection, structured feedback and benchmarking.通过即时医疗数据收集、结构化反馈和基准评估,系统性改善国家临终关怀/姑息治疗服务的症状治疗效果。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Feb;23(2):307-15. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2351-8. Epub 2014 Jul 27.
6
A psychometric validation of two brief measures to assess palliative need in patients severely affected by multiple sclerosis.评估严重受多发性硬化症影响的患者的姑息需求的两种简短测量方法的心理测量学验证。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Sep;46(3):406-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.08.007. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
7
Measuring symptom distress in palliative care: psychometric properties of the Symptom Assessment Scale (SAS).测量姑息治疗中的症状困扰:症状评估量表(SAS)的心理测量特性。
J Palliat Med. 2011 Mar;14(3):315-21. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0412. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
8
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.针对健康状况调查问卷的测量属性提出了质量标准。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012. Epub 2006 Aug 24.
9
The Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status (AKPS) scale: a revised scale for contemporary palliative care clinical practice [ISRCTN81117481].澳大利亚改良卡诺夫斯基功能状态量表(AKPS):当代姑息治疗临床实践的修订量表[国际标准随机对照试验编号81117481]
BMC Palliat Care. 2005 Nov 12;4:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-4-7.
10
Preparing the 21st century global healthcare workforce.培养21世纪全球医疗保健劳动力。
BMJ. 2005 Mar 19;330(7492):637-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7492.637.

PCOC 症状评估量表(SAS):一种在护理点和姑息治疗计划中日常使用的有效测量工具。

The PCOC Symptom Assessment Scale (SAS): A valid measure for daily use at point of care and in palliative care programs.

机构信息

Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration, Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.

Monash Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Eastern Health, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 25;16(3):e0247250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247250. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0247250
PMID:33765077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7993777/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Very few measures are used successfully as part of routine care within national palliative care outcome programs. Only a handful of studies examine these measures. The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity of a measure used in a national outcomes program: the Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration Symptom Assessment Scale (PCOC SAS).

METHODS

A retrospective multi-site cohort study with secondary analysis of routinely collected patient-level data to assess PCOC SAS's internal consistency, construct validity, reliability, interpretability, acceptability and sensitivity. The analyses used two sets, with data collected by inpatient and community palliative care services registered with the Australian national PCOC.

RESULTS

Dataset one included 1,117 patients receiving palliative care from 21 services. Dataset two included 5,294 patients receiving palliative care from 119 PCOC services. PCOC SAS demonstrated the ability to detect and discriminate distress by palliative care phase, functional status and diagnosis. Excellent and good convergent and discriminant validity were demonstrated. Fair through to substantial inter-rater and intra-rater reliability levels were evidenced. Sufficient interpretability resulted along with necessary levels of acceptability and sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

PCOC SAS is a valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measure suitable for use in routine clinical care with patients requiring palliative and or end-of-life care, including in national outcomes programs.

摘要

背景

在国家姑息治疗结果计划中,很少有措施被成功用作常规护理的一部分。只有少数研究检查了这些措施。本研究旨在评估一种在国家结果计划中使用的措施的有效性:姑息治疗结果合作症状评估量表(PCOC SAS)。

方法

这是一项回顾性多地点队列研究,对常规收集的患者水平数据进行二次分析,以评估 PCOC SAS 的内部一致性、结构有效性、可靠性、可解释性、可接受性和敏感性。分析使用了两组数据,一组由澳大利亚国家 PCOC 注册的住院和社区姑息治疗服务收集,另一组由 119 个 PCOC 服务收集。

结果

数据集一包括 21 个服务机构的 1117 名接受姑息治疗的患者,数据集二包括 119 个 PCOC 服务机构的 5294 名接受姑息治疗的患者。PCOC SAS 显示出能够通过姑息治疗阶段、功能状态和诊断来检测和区分痛苦。显示出良好的收敛和判别有效性。证据表明,观察者间和观察者内的可靠性水平从良好到中等。具有足够的可解释性以及必要的可接受性和敏感性。

结论

PCOC SAS 是一种有效的、可靠的患者报告结局测量工具,适用于需要姑息治疗和/或生命末期护理的患者的常规临床护理,包括在国家结果计划中。