Chin Thomas J, Lee Arier C L, Fulcher Mark L
Anglesea Sports Medicine, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Summit Sports Medicine, Mount Maunganui, New Zealand.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2021 Mar 9;7(1):e001006. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-001006. eCollection 2021.
To determine professional footballers' level of understanding of the purpose of the precompetition medical assessment (PCMA) and to evaluate their knowledge of potential outcomes following a PCMA, including disqualification.
Professional footballers from the Australasian A-League and Westfield W-League were asked to complete a 25-question survey. The relationship between dichotomised outcomes and explanatory variables was analysed with multivariate logistic regression; p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
A total of 212 players participated (response rate=48.8%). Most respondents selected '' and '' (n=137, 64.6%; n=130, 61.3%) as the purpose of a PCMA. Approximately one-third (n=74, 38.1%) were neutral or believed that a normal PCMA prevented cardiac arrest. Receiving more PCMAs (p<0.0003) and receiving an explanation during their PCMA (p=0.0175) led to greater awareness of the assessment's limitations. Most participants did not know the definitions of syncope (n=181, 93.3%) or Marfan syndrome (n=183, 94.3%). Fifty players (28.1%) did not know that disqualification was a possible outcome of a PCMA, and younger players were less aware of this possible outcome (p=0.0216).
Professional footballers appear to have a limited understanding of the purpose of a PCMA, emphasising the musculoskeletal system and performance. They also appear unfamiliar with the components of the PCMA and medical terms. Finally, many are unaware that disqualification can result from an abnormal PCMA. Player health knowledge must be improved; the informed consent process appears an ideal time to provide this education.
确定职业足球运动员对赛前医学评估(PCMA)目的的理解程度,并评估他们对PCMA潜在结果(包括取消资格)的了解情况。
邀请来自澳大拉西亚A联赛和西田女足联赛的职业足球运动员完成一项包含25个问题的调查。采用多因素逻辑回归分析二分结果与解释变量之间的关系;p<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
共有212名球员参与(回复率=48.8%)。大多数受访者选择“”和“”(n=137,64.6%;n=130,61.3%)作为PCMA的目的。约三分之一(n=74,38.1%)持中立态度或认为正常的PCMA可预防心脏骤停。接受更多次PCMA(p<0.0003)以及在PCMA期间得到解释(p=0.0175)会使对评估局限性的认识更高。大多数参与者不知道晕厥(n=181,93.3%)或马凡综合征(n=183,94.3%)的定义。50名球员(28.1%)不知道取消资格是PCMA的一种可能结果,且年轻球员对这一可能结果的知晓度较低(p=0.0216)。
职业足球运动员似乎对PCMA的目的理解有限,侧重于肌肉骨骼系统和表现。他们似乎也不熟悉PCMA的组成部分和医学术语。最后,许多人不知道异常的PCMA可能导致取消资格。必须提高球员的健康知识水平;知情同意过程似乎是提供这种教育的理想时机。