Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch (HECSB) Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada.
Water and Air Quality Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch (HECSB) Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada.
Toxicol Sci. 2021 May 27;181(2):199-214. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfab039.
Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are widely found in the environment because of their extensive use and persistence. Although several PFAS are well studied, most lack toxicity data to inform human health hazard and risk assessment. This study focused on 4 model PFAS: perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA; 8 carbon), perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS; 4 carbon), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS; 8 carbon), and perfluorodecane sulfonate (PFDS; 10 carbon). Human primary liver cell spheroids (pooled from 10 donors) were exposed to 10 concentrations of each PFAS and analyzed at 4 time points. The approach aimed to: (1) identify gene expression changes mediated by the PFAS, (2) identify similarities in biological responses, (3) compare PFAS potency through benchmark concentration analysis, and (4) derive bioactivity exposure ratios (ratio of the concentration at which biological responses occur, relative to daily human exposure). All PFAS induced transcriptional changes in cholesterol biosynthesis and lipid metabolism pathways, and predicted PPARα activation. PFOS exhibited the most transcriptional activity and had a highly similar gene expression profile to PFDS. PFBS induced the least transcriptional changes and the highest benchmark concentration (ie, was the least potent). The data indicate that these PFAS may have common molecular targets and toxicities, but that PFOS and PFDS are the most similar. The transcriptomic bioactivity exposure ratios derived here for PFOA and PFOS were comparable to those derived using rodent apical endpoints in risk assessments. These data provide a baseline level of toxicity for comparison with other known PFAS using this testing strategy.
全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)由于其广泛的使用和持久性,在环境中广泛存在。尽管已经对几种 PFAS 进行了深入研究,但大多数 PFAS 缺乏毒性数据,无法为人类健康危害和风险评估提供信息。本研究集中于 4 种模型 PFAS:全氟辛酸(PFOA;8 个碳原子)、全氟丁烷磺酸(PFBS;4 个碳原子)、全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS;8 个碳原子)和全氟癸烷磺酸(PFDS;10 个碳原子)。人类原代肝细胞球体(来自 10 个供体的混合)暴露于每种 PFAS 的 10 个浓度,并在 4 个时间点进行分析。该方法旨在:(1)鉴定由 PFAS 介导的基因表达变化,(2)鉴定生物学反应的相似性,(3)通过基准浓度分析比较 PFAS 的效力,以及(4)得出生物活性暴露比(发生生物学反应的浓度与人类每日暴露的比值)。所有 PFAS 均诱导胆固醇生物合成和脂质代谢途径的转录变化,并预测 PPARα 激活。PFOS 表现出最强的转录活性,与 PFDS 的基因表达谱非常相似。PFBS 诱导的转录变化最少,基准浓度最高(即效力最低)。数据表明,这些 PFAS 可能具有共同的分子靶标和毒性,但 PFOS 和 PFDS 最为相似。这里为 PFOA 和 PFOS 推导的转录组生物活性暴露比与使用风险评估中啮齿动物顶极终点推导的暴露比相当。这些数据为使用这种测试策略与其他已知 PFAS 进行比较提供了毒性基准水平。