Fekih-Romdhane Feten, Cheour Majda
Department of Psychiatry "Ibn Omrane", Razi Hospital, 1 Rue des Orangers, Manouba, Tunisie.
Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia.
J Relig Health. 2021 Jun;60(3):1446-1461. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01230-9. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
Despite advances in medicine and technology, when facing epidemics people continue to turn to religion to deal with such unpredictable life-threatening events. We aimed to assess psychological distress in the general population of Tunisia during the COVID-19 pandemic and to examine the contribution of religious coping (RC) in the reports of anxiety and depression at the time of the survey. We carried out and online cross-sectional study using a non-probability snowball sampling technique. A total of 603 responses were recorded. The "Depression Anxiety Stress Scales," the "Brief religious coping scale" and the "Arabic religiosity scale" were used. We found that 28.3%, 24.4% and 19.4% of the participants reported severe or extremely severe levels of depression, anxiety and stress, respectively. The mean score for positive RC was 22.8 ± 5.3, while that for negative RC was 14 ± 5.8. After controlling for confounders, multivariate analysis showed that negative RC significantly and positively contributed to depression and anxiety scores in our respondents, indicating that greater use of negative RC was associated with higher levels of psychological distress. No significant relationship was found between overall religiosity or positive religious coping and either depression or anxiety symptoms. Religious beliefs may have an impact on how people cope with emerging infectious disease outbreaks. Religion should be considered by professionals as an important variable to consider in therapy for individuals who engage in RC or perceive religious needs.
尽管医学和技术不断进步,但面对流行病时,人们仍继续求助于宗教来应对此类不可预测的危及生命的事件。我们旨在评估突尼斯普通人群在新冠疫情期间的心理困扰,并研究宗教应对方式(RC)在调查时焦虑和抑郁报告中的作用。我们采用非概率滚雪球抽样技术进行了一项在线横断面研究。共记录了603份回复。使用了“抑郁焦虑压力量表”、“简短宗教应对量表”和“阿拉伯宗教信仰量表”。我们发现,分别有28.3%、24.4%和19.4%的参与者报告有严重或极其严重程度的抑郁、焦虑和压力。积极宗教应对方式的平均得分为22.8±5.3,而消极宗教应对方式的平均得分为14±5.8。在控制混杂因素后,多变量分析表明,消极宗教应对方式对我们研究对象的抑郁和焦虑得分有显著的正向影响,这表明更多地使用消极宗教应对方式与更高水平的心理困扰相关。在总体宗教信仰或积极宗教应对方式与抑郁或焦虑症状之间未发现显著关系。宗教信仰可能会影响人们应对新出现的传染病疫情的方式。对于采用宗教应对方式或有宗教需求的个体,专业人员应将宗教视为治疗中需要考虑的一个重要变量。