Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Health Expect. 2021 Jun;24(3):940-950. doi: 10.1111/hex.13236. Epub 2021 Mar 28.
Person-centred care implies a change in interaction between care professionals and patients where patients are not passive recipients but co-producers of care. The interactional practices of person-centred care remain largely unexplored.
This study focuses on the analysis of disagreements, which are described as an important part in the co-production of knowledge in interaction.
A qualitative exploratory study using conversation analysis.
Data were collected from a nurse-led person-centred intervention in a hospital outpatient setting. Interactions between adult patients with irritable bowel syndrome (n = 17) and a registered nurse were audio-recorded. COREQ guidelines were applied.
Disagreements were found after demonstration of the nurse's or patients' respective professional or personal knowledge. Disagreements were also evident when deciding on strategies for self-management. Although negotiations between opposing views of the nurse and patient were seen as important, the patient generally claimed final authority both in knowing how IBS is perceived and in the right to choose self-management strategies. The nurse generally oriented towards patient authority, but instances of demonstration of nurse authority despite patient resistance were also found.
This study provides information on how co-production of knowledge and decisions occur in the context of a person-centred care intervention. Negotiations between nurse and patient views require a flexible approach to communication, adapting interaction to each context while bearing in mind the patients having the final authority. To facilitate co-production, the patient's role and responsibilities in interaction should be explicitly stated.
以患者为中心的护理意味着护理专业人员与患者之间的互动方式发生了变化,患者不再是被动的接受者,而是护理的共同生产者。以患者为中心的护理的互动实践在很大程度上仍未得到探索。
本研究重点分析了分歧,分歧被描述为互动中知识共同生产的重要组成部分。
使用会话分析的定性探索性研究。
数据来自于医院门诊环境中由护士主导的以患者为中心的干预措施。记录了 17 名患有肠易激综合征的成年患者与注册护士之间的互动。应用了 COREQ 指南。
在展示了护士或患者各自的专业或个人知识后,发现了分歧。在决定自我管理策略时,也出现了分歧。尽管护士和患者之间对彼此观点的协商被认为很重要,但患者通常对自己如何感知 IBS 以及选择自我管理策略的权利拥有最终决定权。护士通常倾向于患者的权威,但也发现了尽管患者有抵触情绪,护士仍表现出权威的情况。
本研究提供了有关以患者为中心的护理干预背景下知识和决策共同产生的信息。护士和患者观点之间的协商需要灵活的沟通方式,根据每个情境调整互动,同时牢记患者拥有最终决定权。为了促进共同生产,应明确说明患者在互动中的角色和责任。