• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Individual and social factors affecting the ability of American crows to solve and master a string pulling task.影响美洲乌鸦解决和掌握拉绳任务能力的个体因素和社会因素。
Ethology. 2020 Feb;126(2):229-245. doi: 10.1111/eth.12980. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
2
[Comparative study of the ability to solve a string-pulling task in Corvidae].[鸦科鸟类解决拉绳任务能力的比较研究]
Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova. 2010 May-Jun;60(3):321-9.
3
[Corvidae are able to understand the logical structure in string-pulling tasks].鸦科动物能够理解拉绳任务中的逻辑结构。
Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):543-51.
4
An end to insight? New Caledonian crows can spontaneously solve problems without planning their actions.洞察的终结?新喀鸦可以自发地解决问题,而无需计划其行动。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Dec 22;279(1749):4977-81. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1998. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
5
Explorative innovators and flexible use of social information in common ravens (Corvus corax) and carrion crows (Corvus corone).普通渡鸦(Corvus corax)和小嘴乌鸦(Corvus corone)中的探索性创新者及对社会信息的灵活运用
J Comp Psychol. 2016 Nov;130(4):328-340. doi: 10.1037/com0000039. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
6
Brain activity underlying American crow processing of encounters with dead conspecifics.美国乌鸦处理与同类尸体相遇时的大脑活动基础。
Behav Brain Res. 2020 May 15;385:112546. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112546. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
7
Social learning spreads knowledge about dangerous humans among American crows.社会性学习在美洲乌鸦中传播有关危险人类的知识。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Feb 7;279(1728):499-508. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0957. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
8
Eurasian jays do not copy the choices of conspecifics, but they do show evidence of stimulus enhancement.欧亚松鸦不会模仿同种个体的选择,但它们确实表现出刺激增强的证据。
PeerJ. 2016 Dec 1;4:e2746. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2746. eCollection 2016.
9
How New Caledonian crows solve novel foraging problems and what it means for cumulative culture.新喀里多尼亚乌鸦如何解决新颖的觅食问题以及这对累积文化意味着什么。
Learn Behav. 2016 Mar;44(1):18-28. doi: 10.3758/s13420-015-0194-x.
10
Are you better than me? Social comparisons in carrion crows (Corvus corone).你比我优秀吗?腐肉鸦(Corvus corone)中的社会比较。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jul;26(4):1353-1368. doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01785-y. Epub 2023 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
American crows that excel at tool use activate neural circuits distinct from less talented individuals.擅长使用工具的美洲乌鸦激活的神经回路与不那么有天赋的个体不同。
Nat Commun. 2023 Oct 20;14(1):6539. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42203-8.
2
Monkeys who experience more feeding competition utilize social information to learn foraging skills faster.经历更多进食竞争的猴子会利用社交信息更快地学习觅食技能。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 19;13(1):11624. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37536-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial selection on brain size leads to matching changes in overall number of neurons.人工选择对大脑大小的影响导致神经元总数的相应变化。
Evolution. 2019 Sep;73(9):2003-2012. doi: 10.1111/evo.13805. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
2
Absolute brain size predicts dog breed differences in executive function.绝对脑容量预示着不同犬种在执行功能上的差异。
Anim Cogn. 2019 Mar;22(2):187-198. doi: 10.1007/s10071-018-01234-1. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
3
Dogs Have the Most Neurons, Though Not the Largest Brain: Trade-Off between Body Mass and Number of Neurons in the Cerebral Cortex of Large Carnivoran Species.狗拥有最多的神经元,尽管大脑并非最大:大型食肉动物物种大脑皮层中体重与神经元数量之间的权衡。
Front Neuroanat. 2017 Dec 12;11:118. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2017.00118. eCollection 2017.
4
A new tool-using bird to crow about.又有了一种值得吹嘘的会使用工具的鸟类。
Learn Behav. 2017 Sep;45(3):205-206. doi: 10.3758/s13420-017-0262-5.
5
Birds have primate-like numbers of neurons in the forebrain.鸟类前脑中的神经元数量与灵长类动物相似。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jun 28;113(26):7255-60. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517131113. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
6
Ravens attribute visual access to unseen competitors.渡鸦将视觉获取归因于看不见的竞争对手。
Nat Commun. 2016 Feb 2;7:10506. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10506.
7
Brain size predicts problem-solving ability in mammalian carnivores.大脑大小可预测哺乳动物食肉动物的解决问题能力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 1;113(9):2532-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1505913113. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
8
When larger brains do not have more neurons: increased numbers of cells are compensated by decreased average cell size across mouse individuals.当大脑体积增大但神经元数量并未增加时:在小鼠个体中,细胞数量的增加是通过平均细胞大小的减小来补偿的。
Front Neuroanat. 2015 Jun 1;9:64. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2015.00064. eCollection 2015.
9
The string-pulling paradigm in comparative psychology.比较心理学中的拉绳范式。
J Comp Psychol. 2015 May;129(2):89-120. doi: 10.1037/a0038746.
10
Brain size affects female but not male survival under predation threat.在捕食威胁下,大脑大小影响雌性的生存,但不影响雄性的生存。
Ecol Lett. 2015 Jul;18(7):646-52. doi: 10.1111/ele.12441. Epub 2015 May 10.

影响美洲乌鸦解决和掌握拉绳任务能力的个体因素和社会因素。

Individual and social factors affecting the ability of American crows to solve and master a string pulling task.

作者信息

Pendergraft LomaJohn T, Lehnert Adrienne L, Marzluff John M

机构信息

University of Washington, School of Environmental and Forest Sciences.

University of Washington, Department of Radiology.

出版信息

Ethology. 2020 Feb;126(2):229-245. doi: 10.1111/eth.12980. Epub 2019 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1111/eth.12980
PMID:33776175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7996111/
Abstract

Crows and other birds in the family Corvidae regularly share information to learn the identity and whereabouts of dangerous predators, but can they use social learning to solve a novel task for a food reward? Here we examined the factors affecting the ability of 27 wild-caught American crows to solve a common string-pulling task in a laboratory setting. We split crows into two groups; one group was given the task after repeatedly observing a conspecific model the solution, the other solved in the absence of conspecific models. We recorded the crows' estimated age, sex, size, body condition, level of nervousness, and brain volume using DICOM images from a CT scan. Although none of these variables were statistically significant, crows without a conspecific model and large brain volumes consistently mastered the task in the minimum number of days, whereas those with conspecific models and smaller brain volumes required varying and sometimes a substantial number of days to master the task. We found indirect evidence that body condition might also be important for motivating crows to solve the task. Crows with conspecific models were no more likely to initially solve the task than those working the puzzle without social information, but those that mastered the task usually copied the method most frequently demonstrated by their knowledgeable neighbors. These findings suggest that brain volume and possibly body condition may be factors in learning new tasks, and that crows can use social learning to refine their ability to obtain a novel food source, although they must initially learn to access it themselves.

摘要

乌鸦和鸦科的其他鸟类经常会分享信息,以了解危险捕食者的身份和行踪,但它们能否利用社会学习来解决一项获取食物奖励的新任务呢?在这里,我们研究了影响27只野生捕获的美洲乌鸦在实验室环境中解决常见拉绳任务能力的因素。我们将乌鸦分成两组;一组在反复观察同种模型解决问题后被给予任务,另一组在没有同种模型的情况下解决问题。我们使用CT扫描的DICOM图像记录了乌鸦的估计年龄、性别、体型、身体状况、紧张程度和脑容量。尽管这些变量均无统计学意义,但没有同种模型且脑容量大的乌鸦始终能在最少天数内掌握任务,而有同种模型且脑容量小的乌鸦则需要不同且有时是大量天数才能掌握任务。我们发现间接证据表明身体状况可能对激励乌鸦解决任务也很重要。有同种模型的乌鸦最初解决任务的可能性并不比那些没有社会信息独自解谜的乌鸦更高,但那些掌握任务的乌鸦通常会模仿知识渊博的邻居最常展示的方法。这些发现表明,脑容量以及可能的身体状况可能是学习新任务的因素,并且乌鸦可以利用社会学习来提升它们获取新食物来源的能力,尽管它们最初必须自己学会获取。