Schultz Katherine, Schaffer Alicia, Rebman Rebecca, Shanks Anthony
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.
Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.
Cureus. 2021 Feb 21;13(2):e13467. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13467.
Presenting material in a manner that is most palatable to students is important to improve the learning process. We evaluated the efficacy of different teaching styles including the flipped classroom and assessed the learning style preferences of a cohort of medical learners in a preclinical obstetrics and gynecology course.
We conducted three teaching sessions with 35 physician assistant students. A different teaching style was implemented for each session including a traditional lecture with interactive learning technology augmentation, a flipped classroom, and a hybrid approach incorporating lecture and group work. Students were surveyed using a Likert scale regarding the efficacy of the format, clinical relevance of the material, and their learning preference for future sessions.
Students rated the traditional approach as the most effective, most relevant, and most preferred method. Students preferred the flipped classroom least, but they rated it as slightly more effective and relevant than the hybrid approach.
The teaching style of various coursework including the preclinical obstetrics and gynecology curriculum may not need to be altered for millennial learners. This study showed the flipped classroom was the least favored teaching style and that there was a marked preference by students for a more traditional didactic lecture.
以最受学生欢迎的方式呈现材料对于改善学习过程很重要。我们评估了包括翻转课堂在内的不同教学风格的效果,并在临床前妇产科课程中评估了一组医学学习者的学习风格偏好。
我们对35名医师助理学生进行了三次教学课程。每次课程采用不同的教学风格,包括采用交互式学习技术增强的传统讲座、翻转课堂以及结合讲座和小组作业的混合方法。使用李克特量表对学生进行调查,内容涉及教学形式的效果、材料的临床相关性以及他们对未来课程的学习偏好。
学生将传统方法评为最有效、最相关和最受欢迎的方法。学生最不喜欢翻转课堂,但他们认为它比混合方法稍微更有效且更相关。
对于千禧一代学习者而言,包括临床前妇产科课程在内的各种课程作业的教学风格可能无需改变。这项研究表明翻转课堂是最不受青睐的教学风格,并且学生明显更喜欢更传统的讲授式讲座。