Suppr超能文献

等离子体动力学前列腺剜除术联合钬激光前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生:一项 3 年随访的随机对照试验。

Plasma Kinetic Enucleation Holmium Laser Enucleation for Treating Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial with a 3-Year Follow-Up.

机构信息

Urology Department, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2021 Oct;35(10):1533-1540. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0086. Epub 2021 Apr 26.

Abstract

To compare the efficacy and safety of plasma kinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). A total of 160 patients with indications for the surgical treatment of BPH were randomly assigned to receive either PKEP or HoLEP prospectively. Baseline characteristics, perioperative data, and postoperative outcomes of the patients were recorded. One hundred twenty-six (78.75%) patients (PKEP 64 HoLEP 62) completed the 3-year follow-up assessment. Patients in both groups had similar baseline characteristics. Compared with PKEP, HoLEP was associated with shorter operative time as well as take-out time, lower perioperative hemoglobin decrease, and shorter bladder irrigation time, catheterization time, and hospital stay time. PKEP was superior to HoLEP in terms of the noise of the machine and hospitalization expenses. There were no significant differences in enucleating time, resected weight, and serum sodium levels. Both groups achieved satisfactory results and maintained improvement from baseline in terms of maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), International Prostatic Symptomatic Score, quality of life, and postvoid residual at 3-year follow-up, with no significant differences between the two procedures. Except for re-catheterization rate, postoperative data such as transrectal ultrasound volume, International Index of Erectile Function-5, and follow-up scores of the flexible cystourethroscopy results, as well as the acute and mid-to long-term complications after surgery, were statistically similar. The 3-year follow-up data of this randomized trial confirmed that both PKEP and HoLEP were effective and safe surgical procedures for the transurethral management of BPH. HoLEP presented certain advantages compared to PKEP, such as reduced operative duration, decreased risk of blood loss, and less bladder irrigation, hospital stay time, and re-catheterization rate, whereas PKEP had lower noise and no additional laser cost. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-TRC-13004468).

摘要

比较等离子体前列腺剜除术(PKEP)与钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的疗效和安全性。将 160 例有手术指征的 BPH 患者前瞻性随机分为 PKEP 组和 HoLEP 组。记录患者的一般资料、围手术期数据和术后结果。126 例(PKEP 组 64 例,HoLEP 组 62 例)患者完成了 3 年随访评估。两组患者的基线特征相似。与 PKEP 相比,HoLEP 手术时间和取出时间更短,围手术期血红蛋白下降更少,膀胱冲洗时间、导尿管留置时间和住院时间更短。PKEP 在机器噪音和住院费用方面优于 HoLEP。两组的前列腺切除重量和血清钠水平无显著差异。两组在最大尿流率(Qmax)、国际前列腺症状评分、生活质量和术后 3 年残余尿量方面均取得了满意的效果,并保持了从基线开始的改善,两种手术方法之间无显著差异。除再次导尿率外,术后经直肠超声体积、国际勃起功能指数-5、软性膀胱镜检查结果随访评分以及术后急性和中远期并发症等其他数据均相似。这项随机试验的 3 年随访数据证实,PKEP 和 HoLEP 均是治疗 BPH 的有效、安全的经尿道手术方法。与 PKEP 相比,HoLEP 具有手术时间更短、失血量更少、膀胱冲洗时间、住院时间和再次导尿率更低的优点,而 PKEP 的噪音更小,且无额外的激光费用。中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR-TRC-13004468)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验