• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国泌尿科各系接受美国国立卫生研究院资助的当代趋势和最终结果:10 年分析。

Contemporary Trends and End-Results of National Institutes of Health Grant Funding to Departments of Urology in the United States: A 10-year Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

J Urol. 2021 Aug;206(2):427-433. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001751. Epub 2021 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000001751
PMID:33780282
Abstract

PURPOSE

We explored the patterns and distribution of National Institutes of Health grant funding for urological research in the United States.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Institutes of Health RePORTER database was queried for all grants awarded to urology departments between 2010 and 2019. Information regarding the value of the grant, funded institution, successful publication of the research, and the category of urological subspecialty were collected. Data on principal investigators were extracted from publicly available information.

RESULTS

There were 509 grants awarded to Urology between 2010 and 2019 for a total value of $640,873,867, and a median per-project value of $675,484 (IQR 344,170-1,369,385). Over the study period, total funding decreased by 15.6% and was lower compared to other surgical subspecialties. Most grants were awarded by the National Cancer Institute and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (85%) to Western or North Central institutions (52.5%), and had principal investigators specialized in urologic oncology (56.4%), followed by general urologists (21.5%). Female principal investigators led 21.6% of Urology grants and were more likely PhD basic scientists than males (64.4% vs 38.2%, p=0.001). In total, 10,404 publications linked to the 509 grants were produced, of which 28.5% were published in journals with an impact factor ≥10.

CONCLUSIONS

Urology is underrepresented in National Institutes of Health grant funding compared to other surgical fields. During the past decade there was a further decrease in the total budget of National Institutes of Health grants to Urology.

摘要

目的

我们探索了美国泌尿科研究中美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助拨款的模式和分布。

材料和方法

通过查询 NIH RePORTER 数据库,获取了 2010 年至 2019 年期间授予泌尿科系的所有拨款信息。收集了拨款金额、资助机构、研究成功发表情况以及泌尿科亚专科分类等信息。从公开信息中提取了主要研究者的数据。

结果

2010 年至 2019 年期间,共有 509 项拨款授予泌尿科,总价值为 640873867 美元,平均每个项目价值为 675484 美元(IQR 344170-1369385)。在研究期间,总资金减少了 15.6%,与其他外科亚专科相比有所下降。大多数拨款由美国国立癌症研究所和美国国立糖尿病、消化和肾脏疾病研究所(85%)授予,资助对象为西部或中北部机构(52.5%),主要研究者为泌尿科肿瘤学专家(56.4%),其次是普通泌尿科医生(21.5%)。女性主要研究者领导了 21.6%的泌尿科拨款,她们比男性更有可能是博士基础科学家(64.4%比 38.2%,p=0.001)。总共产生了与 509 项拨款相关的 10404 篇出版物,其中 28.5%发表在影响因子≥10 的期刊上。

结论

与其他外科领域相比,NIH 拨款资助中泌尿科的代表性不足。在过去十年中,NIH 拨款给泌尿科的总预算进一步减少。

相似文献

1
Contemporary Trends and End-Results of National Institutes of Health Grant Funding to Departments of Urology in the United States: A 10-year Analysis.美国泌尿科各系接受美国国立卫生研究院资助的当代趋势和最终结果:10 年分析。
J Urol. 2021 Aug;206(2):427-433. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001751. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
2
Patterns of National Institutes of Health Grant Funding to Surgical Research and Scholarly Productivity in the United States.美国国立卫生研究院资助的外科研究和学术成果模式。
Ann Surg. 2020 Oct;272(4):539-546. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004206.
3
Gender differences in funding among grant recipients in emergency medicine: A multicenter analysis.在急诊医学领域,资助获得者中的性别差异:一项多中心分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul;38(7):1357-1361. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
4
Trends in National Institutes of Health Funding of Principal Investigators in Dermatology Research by Academic Degree and Sex.按学术学位和性别划分的皮肤科研究首席研究员 NIH 资助趋势。
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Aug 1;152(8):883-8. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.0271.
5
National Institutes of Health Funding to Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery at U.S. Medical Schools.美国国立卫生研究院对美国医学院校骨科手术科室的资助。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jan 18;99(2):e5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00088.
6
Analysis of National Institutes of Health Funding to Departments of Urology.美国国立卫生研究院对泌尿外科各科室资金投入情况分析。
Urology. 2016 May;91:6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.02.029. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
7
Comparing National Institutes of Health funding of emergency medicine to four medical specialties.比较美国国立卫生研究院对急诊医学与四个医学专业的资助。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Sep;18(9):1001-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01138.x. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
8
Trends in research support and productivity in the changing environment of academic surgery.学术外科不断变化的环境下研究支持与生产力的趋势
J Surg Res. 2004 Feb;116(2):197-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2003.10.012.
9
Grant funding among underrepresented minority and women urologists at academic institutions.学术机构中代表性不足的少数族裔和女性泌尿科医生的资助情况。
Can J Urol. 2024 Feb;31(1):11777-11783.
10
Urology peer review at the National Institutes of Health.美国国立卫生研究院的泌尿外科同行评审
J Urol. 1995 Nov;154(5):1866-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Are females in classical hematology getting a fair share? Uncovering gender disparities in NIH R01 grants.在经典血液学领域,女性是否得到了公平的份额?揭示美国国立卫生研究院R01基金中的性别差异。
Front Sociol. 2024 Nov 18;9:1430369. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1430369. eCollection 2024.