Suppr超能文献

社会经济剥夺对痴呆症死亡率、死亡年龄和诊断质量的影响:2001-2017 年英格兰和威尔士全国死亡记录研究

The Influence of Socioeconomic Deprivation on Dementia Mortality, Age at Death, and Quality of Diagnosis: A Nationwide Death Records Study in England and Wales 2001-2017.

机构信息

Preventive Neurology Unit, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Department of Neurology, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;81(1):321-328. doi: 10.3233/JAD-210089.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic deprivation may be an important determinant of dementia risk, mortality, and access to diagnostic services. Premature mortality from other causes and under-representation of deprived individuals in research may lead to this effect being overlooked.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the relationship between deprivation and dementia mortality using comprehensive death certificate data for England and Wales from 2001 to 2017.

METHODS

We used standardized mortality ratios (SMR) and a Poisson model to compare likelihood of dying from dementia in each deprivation decile. We also examined the associations of deprivation with age at death from dementia, and with likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of unspecified dementia.

RESULTS

Risk of dying from dementia was higher in more deprived deciles (Mean SMR [95% CI] in decile 1 : 0.528 [0.506 to 0.550], decile 10:0.369 [0.338 to 0.400]). In 2017, 14,837 excess dementia deaths were attributable to deprivation (21.5% of all dementia deaths that year). There were dose-response associations of deprivation with likelihood of being older at death with dementia (odds ratio [95% CI] for decile 10 (least deprived): 1.31 [1.28 to 1.33] relative to decile 1), and with likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of unspecified dementia (odds ratio [95% CI] for decile 10:0.78 [0.76 to 0.80] relative to decile 1).

CONCLUSION

Socioeconomic deprivation in England and Wales is associated with increased dementia mortality, younger age at death with dementia, and poorer access to specialist diagnosis. Reducing social inequality may have a role in the prevention of dementia mortality.

摘要

背景

社会经济贫困可能是痴呆风险、死亡率和获得诊断服务的重要决定因素。由于其他原因导致的过早死亡以及贫困人群在研究中的代表性不足,可能导致这种影响被忽视。

目的

我们使用 2001 年至 2017 年英格兰和威尔士的综合死亡证明数据,评估贫困与痴呆死亡率之间的关系。

方法

我们使用标准化死亡率比(SMR)和泊松模型比较每个贫困程度十位数组中死于痴呆的可能性。我们还检查了贫困与痴呆死亡年龄以及获得未特指痴呆诊断的可能性之间的关联。

结果

死于痴呆的风险在贫困程度较高的十位数组中更高(第 1 十位数的平均 SMR [95%CI]:0.528 [0.506 至 0.550],第 10 十位数:0.369 [0.338 至 0.400])。2017 年,有 14837 例痴呆死亡归因于贫困(当年所有痴呆死亡人数的 21.5%)。与贫困程度的关联存在剂量反应关系,与痴呆死亡时年龄较大的可能性相关(第 10 十位数(最不贫困)的比值比 [95%CI]:1.31 [1.28 至 1.33],与第 1 十位数相比),与获得未特指痴呆诊断的可能性相关(第 10 十位数的比值比 [95%CI]:0.78 [0.76 至 0.80],与第 1 十位数相比)。

结论

英格兰和威尔士的社会经济贫困与痴呆死亡率增加、痴呆死亡时年龄较小以及获得专业诊断的机会较差有关。减少社会不平等可能在预防痴呆死亡率方面发挥作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验