Preventive Neurology Unit, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Department of Neurology, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;81(1):321-328. doi: 10.3233/JAD-210089.
Socioeconomic deprivation may be an important determinant of dementia risk, mortality, and access to diagnostic services. Premature mortality from other causes and under-representation of deprived individuals in research may lead to this effect being overlooked.
We assessed the relationship between deprivation and dementia mortality using comprehensive death certificate data for England and Wales from 2001 to 2017.
We used standardized mortality ratios (SMR) and a Poisson model to compare likelihood of dying from dementia in each deprivation decile. We also examined the associations of deprivation with age at death from dementia, and with likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of unspecified dementia.
Risk of dying from dementia was higher in more deprived deciles (Mean SMR [95% CI] in decile 1 : 0.528 [0.506 to 0.550], decile 10:0.369 [0.338 to 0.400]). In 2017, 14,837 excess dementia deaths were attributable to deprivation (21.5% of all dementia deaths that year). There were dose-response associations of deprivation with likelihood of being older at death with dementia (odds ratio [95% CI] for decile 10 (least deprived): 1.31 [1.28 to 1.33] relative to decile 1), and with likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of unspecified dementia (odds ratio [95% CI] for decile 10:0.78 [0.76 to 0.80] relative to decile 1).
Socioeconomic deprivation in England and Wales is associated with increased dementia mortality, younger age at death with dementia, and poorer access to specialist diagnosis. Reducing social inequality may have a role in the prevention of dementia mortality.
社会经济贫困可能是痴呆风险、死亡率和获得诊断服务的重要决定因素。由于其他原因导致的过早死亡以及贫困人群在研究中的代表性不足,可能导致这种影响被忽视。
我们使用 2001 年至 2017 年英格兰和威尔士的综合死亡证明数据,评估贫困与痴呆死亡率之间的关系。
我们使用标准化死亡率比(SMR)和泊松模型比较每个贫困程度十位数组中死于痴呆的可能性。我们还检查了贫困与痴呆死亡年龄以及获得未特指痴呆诊断的可能性之间的关联。
死于痴呆的风险在贫困程度较高的十位数组中更高(第 1 十位数的平均 SMR [95%CI]:0.528 [0.506 至 0.550],第 10 十位数:0.369 [0.338 至 0.400])。2017 年,有 14837 例痴呆死亡归因于贫困(当年所有痴呆死亡人数的 21.5%)。与贫困程度的关联存在剂量反应关系,与痴呆死亡时年龄较大的可能性相关(第 10 十位数(最不贫困)的比值比 [95%CI]:1.31 [1.28 至 1.33],与第 1 十位数相比),与获得未特指痴呆诊断的可能性相关(第 10 十位数的比值比 [95%CI]:0.78 [0.76 至 0.80],与第 1 十位数相比)。
英格兰和威尔士的社会经济贫困与痴呆死亡率增加、痴呆死亡时年龄较小以及获得专业诊断的机会较差有关。减少社会不平等可能在预防痴呆死亡率方面发挥作用。