Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.
Department of Bioengineering, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, United States of America.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Mar 29;17(3):e1008779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008779. eCollection 2021 Mar.
Current dominant views hold that perceptual confidence reflects the probability that a decision is correct. Although these views have enjoyed some empirical support, recent behavioral results indicate that confidence and the probability of being correct can be dissociated. An alternative hypothesis suggests that confidence instead reflects the magnitude of evidence in favor of a decision while being relatively insensitive to the evidence opposing the decision. We considered how this alternative hypothesis might be biologically instantiated by developing a simple neural network model incorporating a known property of sensory neurons: tuned inhibition. The key idea of the model is that the level of inhibition that each accumulator unit receives from units with the opposite tuning preference, i.e. its inhibition 'tuning', dictates its contribution to perceptual decisions versus confidence judgments, such that units with higher tuned inhibition (computing relative evidence for different perceptual interpretations) determine perceptual discrimination decisions, and units with lower tuned inhibition (computing absolute evidence) determine confidence. We demonstrate that this biologically plausible model can account for several counterintuitive findings reported in the literature where confidence and decision accuracy dissociate. By comparing model fits, we further demonstrate that a full complement of behavioral data across several previously published experimental results-including accuracy, reaction time, mean confidence, and metacognitive sensitivity-is best accounted for when confidence is computed from units without, rather than units with, tuned inhibition. Finally, we discuss predictions of our results and model for future neurobiological studies. These findings suggest that the brain has developed and implements this alternative, heuristic theory of perceptual confidence computation by relying on the diversity of neural resources available.
当前主流观点认为,感知信心反映了决策正确的概率。尽管这些观点得到了一些实证支持,但最近的行为研究结果表明,信心和正确的概率可以分离。另一种假设认为,信心反映了支持决策的证据的大小,而对决策的反证相对不敏感。我们考虑了这个替代假设如何通过开发一个简单的神经网络模型来实现,该模型包含了感觉神经元的一个已知特性:调谐抑制。该模型的关键思想是,每个累加器单元从具有相反调谐偏好的单元接收的抑制水平,即其抑制“调谐”,决定了它对感知决策和信心判断的贡献,使得具有更高调谐抑制的单元(计算不同感知解释的相对证据)决定感知辨别决策,而具有更低调谐抑制的单元(计算绝对证据)决定信心。我们证明,这种具有生物学合理性的模型可以解释文献中报道的几种违反直觉的发现,即信心和决策准确性分离。通过比较模型拟合度,我们进一步证明,当信心是从没有调谐抑制的单元而不是具有调谐抑制的单元计算时,能够最好地解释几个先前发表的实验结果中的行为数据,包括准确性、反应时间、平均信心和元认知敏感性。最后,我们讨论了我们的结果和模型对未来神经生物学研究的预测。这些发现表明,大脑通过利用可用的神经资源的多样性,已经开发并实施了这种替代的、启发式的感知信心计算理论。