• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

道路交通和空气污染:来自 2019 年冠状病毒病爆发期间全国交通管制的证据。

Road traffic and air pollution: Evidence from a nationwide traffic control during coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak.

机构信息

Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Ministry of Education and State Key Laboratory of Environmental Health (Incubating), School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 13 Hangkong Road, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, China.

Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Ministry of Education and State Key Laboratory of Environmental Health (Incubating), School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 13 Hangkong Road, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2021 Aug 10;781:146618. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146618. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146618
PMID:33780836
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9671408/
Abstract

Existing estimations of air pollution from automobile sources are based on either experiments or small-scale governmental interventions. China's nationwide traffic control during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak provided us a unique opportunity to assess the direct dose-effect relationship between vehicle density and air pollution. We found that, during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak, the nationwide reduced air pollution (except for O) could be largely explained by traffic control measures. During the traffic control period, every doubling of vehicle density was associated with a decrease of 4.2 (2.0, 6.4) μg/m in PM, 5.5 (2.9, 8.1) μg/m in PM, 1.5 (0.9, 2.0) μg/m in NO, and 0.04 (0.02, 0.07) mg/m in CO comparing cities with different vehicle densities. Similarly, for every 10% increase in the truck proportion, PM decreased by 12.3 (4.1, 20.6) μg/m, PM decreased by 14.3 (4.6, 23.9) μg/m, and CO decreased by 0.14 (0.05, 0.23) mg/m. Moreover, the associations between vehicle density and reduction in PM, PM, and CO during the traffic control period were stronger and showed near-complete linearity in cities with low green coverage rate (All P < 0.05 for interaction). According to our estimation, PM emissions from every doubling of vehicle density can lead to over 8000 excess deaths per year, 66% of which were caused by cardiopulmonary diseases. This natural experiment study is the first to observe the dose-effect relationship between on-road traffic and traffic-generated air pollution, as well as the mitigating effect of urban greening. Findings provide key evidence to the assessment and control of traffic-generated air pollution and its public health impact.

摘要

现有汽车污染源的空气污染估计是基于实验或小规模政府干预得出的。在中国 2019 冠状病毒病期间实施的全国性交通管制为我们提供了一个独特的机会,可以评估车辆密度与空气污染之间的直接剂量-效应关系。我们发现,在 2019 冠状病毒病期间,全国范围内减少的空气污染(除了 O 之外)在很大程度上可以用交通管制措施来解释。在交通管制期间,车辆密度每增加一倍,PM 浓度就会降低 4.2(2.0,6.4)μg/m,PM 浓度降低 5.5(2.9,8.1)μg/m,NO 浓度降低 1.5(0.9,2.0)μg/m,CO 浓度降低 0.04(0.02,0.07)mg/m,而不同车辆密度的城市之间存在差异。同样,卡车比例每增加 10%,PM 浓度就会降低 12.3(4.1,20.6)μg/m,PM 浓度降低 14.3(4.6,23.9)μg/m,CO 浓度降低 0.14(0.05,0.23)mg/m。此外,在交通管制期间,车辆密度与 PM、PM 和 CO 减少之间的关系在绿色覆盖率较低的城市中更强,并且呈近乎完全线性关系(所有交互作用 P<0.05)。根据我们的估计,车辆密度每增加一倍,PM 排放量就会导致每年超过 8000 人超额死亡,其中 66%是由心肺疾病引起的。这项自然实验研究首次观察到了道路交通与交通产生的空气污染之间的剂量-效应关系,以及城市绿化的缓解作用。研究结果为评估和控制交通产生的空气污染及其对公众健康的影响提供了关键证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2411/9671408/8177ab180a79/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2411/9671408/b8ed813ced96/ga1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2411/9671408/5eaeb5e5f554/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2411/9671408/44f2ea581ab3/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2411/9671408/8177ab180a79/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2411/9671408/b8ed813ced96/ga1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2411/9671408/5eaeb5e5f554/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2411/9671408/44f2ea581ab3/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2411/9671408/8177ab180a79/gr3_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Road traffic and air pollution: Evidence from a nationwide traffic control during coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak.道路交通和空气污染:来自 2019 年冠状病毒病爆发期间全国交通管制的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Aug 10;781:146618. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146618. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
2
Assessment of light-duty versus heavy-duty diesel on-road mobile source emissions using general additive models applied to traffic volume and air quality data and COVID-19 responses.使用广义加性模型评估轻型和重型柴油车道路移动源排放对交通量和空气质量数据及 COVID-19 应对措施的影响。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2023 May;73(5):374-393. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2023.2185315.
3
The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.拥堵收费计划对伦敦空气质量的影响。第1部分。排放建模与空气污染测量分析。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2011 Apr(155):5-71.
4
The London low emission zone baseline study.伦敦低排放区基线研究。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2011 Nov(163):3-79.
5
Effects of China's current Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan on air pollution patterns, health risks and mortalities in Beijing 2014-2018.2014-2018 年中国当前大气污染防治行动计划对北京地区空气污染模式、健康风险和死亡率的影响。
Chemosphere. 2020 Dec;260:127572. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127572. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
6
Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.长期暴露于交通相关空气污染对荷兰呼吸道和心血管疾病死亡率的影响:荷兰长期队列空气污染研究(NLCS-AIR研究)
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009 Mar(139):5-71; discussion 73-89.
7
Implications for air quality management of changes in air quality during lockdown in Auckland (New Zealand) in response to the 2020 SARS-CoV-2 epidemic.2020 年 SARS-CoV-2 疫情期间奥克兰(新西兰)封城期间空气质量变化对空气质量管理的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Dec 1;746:141129. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141129. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
8
Unprecedented reduction in air pollution and corresponding short-term premature mortality associated with COVID-19 lockdown in Delhi, India.印度德里 COVID-19 封锁期间,空气污染前所未有减少,与之相关的短期过早死亡率也降低。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2021 Sep;71(9):1085-1101. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2021.1905104. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
9
Examining the status of improved air quality in world cities due to COVID-19 led temporary reduction in anthropogenic emissions.研究因新冠疫情导致人为排放暂时减少而使世界城市空气质量得到改善的状况。
Environ Res. 2021 May;196:110927. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110927. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
10
Health and related economic benefits associated with reduction in air pollution during COVID-19 outbreak in 367 cities in China.中国 367 个城市在 COVID-19 爆发期间减少空气污染带来的健康和相关经济效益。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021 Oct 1;222:112481. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112481. Epub 2021 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of the impacts of the coronavirus crisis on urban transport: Key lessons learned and prospects for future cities.关于冠状病毒危机对城市交通影响的系统综述:关键经验教训及未来城市展望
Cities. 2022 Aug;127:103770. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103770. Epub 2022 May 27.
2
Association of population migration with air quality: Role of city attributes in China during COVID-19 pandemic (2019-2021).人口迁移与空气质量的关联:新冠疫情期间(2019 - 2021年)中国城市属性的作用
Atmos Pollut Res. 2022 May;13(5):101419. doi: 10.1016/j.apr.2022.101419. Epub 2022 Apr 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Impacts of the COVID-19 event on the NOx emissions of key polluting enterprises in China.新冠疫情事件对中国重点污染企业氮氧化物排放的影响。
Appl Energy. 2021 Jan 1;281:116042. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116042. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
2
Have traffic restrictions improved air quality? A shock from COVID-19.交通限制措施是否改善了空气质量?来自新冠疫情的冲击。
J Clean Prod. 2021 Jan 10;279:123622. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123622. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
3
Amplified ozone pollution in cities during the COVID-19 lockdown.城市中 COVID-19 封锁期间臭氧污染加剧。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Sep 15;735:139542. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139542. Epub 2020 May 20.
4
Does lockdown reduce air pollution? Evidence from 44 cities in northern China.封城是否减少了空气污染?来自中国北方 44 个城市的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 20;731:139052. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139052. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
5
Changes in air quality related to the control of coronavirus in China: Implications for traffic and industrial emissions.空气质量变化与中国冠状病毒控制的关系:对交通和工业排放的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 20;731:139133. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139133. Epub 2020 May 6.
6
Effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions to contain COVID-19 in China.中国采取的非药物性干预措施对遏制 2019 冠状病毒病的效果。
Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7825):410-413. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2293-x. Epub 2020 May 4.
7
COVID-19 pandemic and environmental pollution: A blessing in disguise?新冠疫情与环境污染:因祸得福?
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 1;728:138820. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138820. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
8
Severe air pollution events not avoided by reduced anthropogenic activities during COVID-19 outbreak.新冠疫情期间人为活动减少并未避免严重空气污染事件的发生。
Resour Conserv Recycl. 2020 Jul;158:104814. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104814. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
9
Association of Public Health Interventions With the Epidemiology of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Wuhan, China.公共卫生干预措施与中国武汉 COVID-19 疫情流行病学的关联。
JAMA. 2020 May 19;323(19):1915-1923. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6130.
10
Diesel exhaust and bladder cancer risk by pathologic stage and grade subtypes.柴油机废气与膀胱癌患病风险:病理分期和分级亚型视角
Environ Int. 2020 Feb;135:105346. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105346. Epub 2019 Dec 18.