Suppr超能文献

他汀类药物治疗重度抑郁症:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Statins for major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.

Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 30;16(3):e0249409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249409. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The burden of depressive disorder is large and new treatment approaches are required. Repurposing widely available drugs such as statins may be a time- and cost-effective solution. Statins have anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties which have been shown to be relevant to the pathophysiology of depression. This study assesses the efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety of statins in major depressive disorder.

METHODS

Our study is an update and extension of a previous meta-analysis published in 2016 by Salagre et al. We performed a systematic review (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, ISI Web of Science, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov until the 1st September 2020) and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using any statin against placebo or any other statin in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Our primary efficacy outcome measure was the mean value on any standardized scale for depressive symptoms at 8 weeks of treatment. We also calculated outcomes for efficacy, response, and remission at 2, 4, and 12 weeks, as well as acceptability (dropouts for any cause), tolerability (dropouts due to any adverse event), and safety (any adverse event) outcomes at the studies' endpoints. Furthermore, we conducted an exploratory network meta-analysis for the primary efficacy outcome to identify potential differences between statins.

RESULTS

We retrieved five randomized controlled trials meeting our inclusion criteria: four used a statin in addition to an antidepressant and compared it to placebo plus antidepressant, and one compared two statins alone. and one comparing one statin with another. Statins compared to placebo in addition to antidepressants were efficacious at 8 weeks (N = 255, SMD = -0.48, 95% CI = -0.74 to -0. 22) and 12 weeks (N = 134, SMD = -0.47, 95% CI = -0.89 to -0.05, moderate certainty) with no difference for acceptability, tolerability, and safety (low certainty). An exploratory network meta-analysis suggested that the most lipophilic statins, especially simvastatin, could be more efficacious than less lipophilic or hydrophilic molecules.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review suggests the efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety of statins in addition to antidepressants in patients with major depressive disorder. Further clinical trials in different settings are required to test this result.

TRIAL RGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration: CRD42020170938.

摘要

背景

抑郁症的负担很大,需要新的治疗方法。重新利用广泛可用的药物,如他汀类药物,可能是一种既省时又省钱的解决方案。他汀类药物具有抗炎和抗氧化特性,这与抑郁症的病理生理学有关。本研究评估了他汀类药物治疗重度抑郁症的疗效、可接受性、耐受性和安全性。

方法

我们的研究是对 2016 年 Salagre 等人发表的先前荟萃分析的更新和扩展。我们进行了系统评价(PubMed/MEDLINE、Cochrane 中央、ISI Web of Science、CINAHL 和 ClinicalTrials.gov,截至 2020 年 9 月 1 日)和荟萃分析,评估了任何他汀类药物与安慰剂或任何其他他汀类药物治疗重度抑郁症的疗效。我们的主要疗效指标是治疗 8 周时任何标准化抑郁症状量表的平均值。我们还计算了 2、4 和 12 周时的疗效、反应和缓解率,以及研究终点时的可接受性(任何原因的辍学)、耐受性(任何不良事件导致的辍学)和安全性(任何不良事件)结果。此外,我们还进行了探索性网络荟萃分析,以确定他汀类药物之间可能存在的差异。

结果

我们检索到符合纳入标准的五项随机对照试验:四项试验使用他汀类药物联合抗抑郁药,并与抗抑郁药联合安慰剂进行比较,一项试验比较了两种他汀类药物单独使用。和一项比较一种他汀类药物与另一种他汀类药物。与安慰剂加抗抑郁药相比,他汀类药物在 8 周(N = 255,SMD = -0.48,95%CI = -0.74 至 -0.22)和 12 周(N = 134,SMD = -0.47,95%CI = -0.89 至 -0.05,中等确定性)时有效,在可接受性、耐受性和安全性方面无差异(低确定性)。探索性网络荟萃分析表明,最亲脂性的他汀类药物,特别是辛伐他汀,可能比疏水性或亲水性分子更有效。

结论

本系统评价提示他汀类药物联合抗抑郁药治疗重度抑郁症患者的疗效、可接受性、耐受性和安全性。需要在不同环境下进行进一步的临床试验来验证这一结果。

试验注册号

PROSPERO 注册:CRD42020170938。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验