• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对美国第十类诊所中医疗服务提供者围绕基于生育意识的方法的知识、态度和实践的混合方法评估。

A Mixed-Methods Assessment of Health Care Providers' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Around Fertility Awareness-Based Methods in Title X Clinics in the United States.

作者信息

Webb Shelby, Cheng An-Lin, Simmons Rebecca, Peragallo Urrutia Rachel, Jennings Victoria, Witt Jacki

机构信息

School of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2020 Sep 15;1(1):354-365. doi: 10.1089/whr.2020.0065. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1089/whr.2020.0065
PMID:33786500
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7784735/
Abstract

To understand how Title X providers currently engage with fertility awareness-based methods (FABMs) for pregnancy prevention in Title X clinics across the United States. We developed a survey to assess knowledge of fertility for purposes of pregnancy prevention, attitudes toward FABMs use for pregnancy prevention, and practices when patients request FABMs for pregnancy prevention. In total, 329 participants who met all inclusion criteria completed the survey. Respondents were generally highly knowledgeable on fertility, felt neutrally toward FABMs or thought they were a nonviable option for most women, and were likely to respond to patient requests for FABMs for pregnancy prevention by providing information. Qualitative responses included several barriers to provision of FABMs for pregnancy prevention and few successes to provision. Fertility knowledge and discussion of specific methods increased with the number of methods included in the clinic's written materials or with the number of different FABMs someone at that clinic had been trained on. Significant clinician or administrative barriers may exist to offering FABMs to patients. Incorporating up-to-date information on a range of FABMs-rather than treating them as one method-into contraceptive counseling represents an opportunity to increase the contraceptive offering for clients who want them, leading to increased patient satisfaction and successful family planning outcomes.

摘要

为了解目前美国第十类计划(Title X)的医疗服务提供者如何在第十类计划诊所中运用基于生育意识的方法(FABMs)来预防怀孕。我们开展了一项调查,以评估预防怀孕方面的生育知识、对使用FABMs预防怀孕的态度,以及当患者要求使用FABMs预防怀孕时的做法。共有329名符合所有纳入标准的参与者完成了该调查。受访者总体上对生育知识了解程度较高,对FABMs持中立态度或认为对大多数女性来说这不是一个可行的选择,并且很可能通过提供信息来回应患者使用FABMs预防怀孕的请求。定性回答包括提供FABMs预防怀孕的几个障碍以及少数成功案例。随着诊所书面材料中包含的方法数量增加,或者该诊所有人接受培训的不同FABMs数量增加,生育知识以及对特定方法的讨论也会增加。向患者提供FABMs可能存在重大的临床医生或管理障碍。将一系列FABMs的最新信息——而不是将它们视为一种方法——纳入避孕咨询,为那些需要的客户增加避孕选择提供了一个机会,从而提高患者满意度并取得成功的计划生育成果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b434/7784735/a31b00b64b7c/whr.2020.0065_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b434/7784735/a31b00b64b7c/whr.2020.0065_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b434/7784735/a31b00b64b7c/whr.2020.0065_figure1.jpg

相似文献

1
A Mixed-Methods Assessment of Health Care Providers' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Around Fertility Awareness-Based Methods in Title X Clinics in the United States.对美国第十类诊所中医疗服务提供者围绕基于生育意识的方法的知识、态度和实践的混合方法评估。
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2020 Sep 15;1(1):354-365. doi: 10.1089/whr.2020.0065. eCollection 2020.
2
Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Family Planning and Women's Health: Impact of an Online Elective.基于生育意识的计划生育方法和妇女健康:在线选修课程的影响。
Fam Med. 2024 Jul;56(7):414-421. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2024.562177. Epub 2024 May 23.
3
An Integrative Review of Fertility Knowledge and Fertility-Awareness Practices Among Women Trying to Conceive.对正在尝试受孕的女性的生育知识和生育意识实践的综合综述。
Nurs Womens Health. 2021 Jun;25(3):198-206. doi: 10.1016/j.nwh.2021.04.001. Epub 2021 May 5.
4
Fertility awareness-based methods: another option for family planning.基于生育意识的方法:计划生育的另一种选择。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 Mar-Apr;22(2):147-57. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.02.080038.
5
Physician Dispositions Toward Noninvasive Non-Hormonal Contraception.医生对非侵入性非激素避孕法的态度。
Kans J Med. 2023 Apr 24;16(1):94-104. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol16.18958. eCollection 2023.
6
Family planning clinic services in the United States, 1994.1994年美国的计划生育诊所服务
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 May-Jun;28(3):92-100.
7
Medical Students' Knowledge of Fertility Awareness-Based Methods of Family Planning.医学生对基于生育意识的计划生育方法的了解。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Jun 1;4:65. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00065. eCollection 2017.
8
Multiple contraceptive method use and prevalence of fertility awareness based method use in the United States, 2013-2015.美国 2013-2015 年多种避孕方法的使用和基于生育意识方法的使用流行率。
Contraception. 2018 Sep;98(3):188-192. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.04.013. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
9
Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Women's Health and Family Planning.基于生育意识的女性健康与计划生育方法。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 24;9:858977. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.858977. eCollection 2022.
10
Vanguard contraceptive users subject of Senegal research.先锋避孕药具使用者成为塞内加尔研究对象。
Netw Res Triangle Park N C. 1985 Winter;6(2):5-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of a fertility awareness-based shared decision-making tool part 2: Patient experiences.基于生育力意识的共同决策工具的评估 第2部分:患者体验。
PEC Innov. 2023 May 23;2:100169. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100169. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Evaluation of a fertility awareness-based shared decision-making tool part 1: Study design and impact on clinician knowledge.基于生育意识的共同决策工具的评估 第1部分:研究设计及其对临床医生知识的影响
PEC Innov. 2022 Jun 28;1:100061. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100061. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Understanding the perspective of women who use the Billings Ovulation Method®: a focus group study.

本文引用的文献

1
Insights Into Provider Bias in Family Planning from a Novel Shared Decision Making Based Counseling Initiative in Rural, Indigenous Guatemala.从危地马拉农村土著地区基于新型共享决策的咨询计划看计划生育中的提供者偏见。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020 Mar 31;8(1):10-17. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00377. Print 2020 Mar 30.
2
Provider Bias in Family Planning Services: A Review of Its Meaning and Manifestations.计划生育服务中的提供者偏见:概念与表现综述。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019 Sep 26;7(3):371-385. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00130. Print 2019 Sep.
3
Effectiveness of Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Pregnancy Prevention: A Systematic Review.
理解使用比林斯排卵法®的女性的观点:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 May 10;23(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02398-w.
4
Physician Dispositions Toward Noninvasive Non-Hormonal Contraception.医生对非侵入性非激素避孕法的态度。
Kans J Med. 2023 Apr 24;16(1):94-104. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol16.18958. eCollection 2023.
基于生育意识的方法预防怀孕的有效性:系统评价。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;132(3):591-604. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002784.
4
Perfect-use and typical-use Pearl Index of a contraceptive mobile app.一款避孕移动应用程序的完美使用和典型使用的珍珠指数。
Contraception. 2017 Dec;96(6):420-425. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.08.014. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
5
Medical Students' Knowledge of Fertility Awareness-Based Methods of Family Planning.医学生对基于生育意识的计划生育方法的了解。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Jun 1;4:65. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00065. eCollection 2017.
6
Assessing the Efficacy of an App-Based Method of Family Planning: The Dot Study Protocol.评估基于应用程序的计划生育方法的效果:Dot研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Jan 18;6(1):e5. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6886.
7
Fertility awareness-based mobile application for contraception.基于生育意识的避孕移动应用程序。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016 Jun;21(3):234-41. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2016.1154143. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
8
Update: Providing Quality Family Planning Services - Recommendations from CDC and the U.S. Office of Population Affairs, 2015.更新:提供优质计划生育服务——疾病预防控制中心和人口事务办公室的建议,2015 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Mar 11;65(9):231-4. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6509a3.
9
Differences in contraceptive use between family planning providers and the U.S. population: results of a nationwide survey.计划生育服务提供者与美国人口在避孕措施使用上的差异:一项全国性调查的结果
Contraception. 2015 Jun;91(6):464-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
10
The Standard Days Method(®): efficacy, satisfaction and demand at regular family planning service delivery settings in Turkey.标准日法(®):土耳其常规计划生育服务机构中的有效性、满意度及需求情况
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2014 Jun;19(3):203-10. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2014.890181. Epub 2014 Mar 6.