Suppr超能文献

基于生育意识的共同决策工具的评估 第1部分:研究设计及其对临床医生知识的影响

Evaluation of a fertility awareness-based shared decision-making tool part 1: Study design and impact on clinician knowledge.

作者信息

Duane Marguerite, Martinez Virginia, Berry Meghan, Manhart Michael D

机构信息

FACTS, 1020 Kearny St NE, Washington DC 20017, USA.

Couple to Couple League International, 5440 Moeller Avenue Suite 149, Cincinnati, OH 45212, USA.

出版信息

PEC Innov. 2022 Jun 28;1:100061. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100061. eCollection 2022 Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of a Shared Decision-Making (SDM) tool for fertility awareness-based methods (FABMs) of family planning.

METHODS

Clinicians familiar with at least one FABM were randomly invited to participate in a prospective cross-over study to compare usual practice to the use of the SDM tool when discussing FABMs with patients. Patients completed surveys pre- and post-office visit and six months later. The primary outcome explored the effect of online education on use of the SDM tool on clinicians' knowledge of FABMs.

RESULTS

Of 278 clinicians contacted, 54% could not be reached, and 15% did not provide women's health services. The 26 clinicians enrolled were experienced, with more than half recommending FABMs for ≥10 years, and 73% recommending more than one FABM to patients. Knowledge scores significantly improved after online training and use of the SDM tool (baseline mean score = 9.54 (scale of 0-12); post-training mean score = 10.73, < 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Education about FABMs and training on use of the SDM tool improved knowledge scores even among an experienced cohort of clinicians.

INNOVATION

The novel SDM tool can better equip clinicians to meet the rising patient interest in FABMs.

摘要

目的

评估一种基于生育力意识的计划生育方法(FABMs)的共同决策(SDM)工具的影响。

方法

随机邀请熟悉至少一种FABM的临床医生参与一项前瞻性交叉研究,以比较在与患者讨论FABMs时常规做法与使用SDM工具的情况。患者在就诊前和就诊后以及六个月后完成调查。主要结果探讨了在线教育对SDM工具使用对临床医生FABMs知识的影响。

结果

在联系的278名临床医生中,54%无法联系到,15%不提供妇女健康服务。纳入的26名临床医生经验丰富,超过一半的人推荐FABMs≥10年,73%向患者推荐不止一种FABM。在线培训和使用SDM工具后,知识得分显著提高(基线平均分=9.54(0-12分制);培训后平均分=10.73,<0.002)。

结论

即使在经验丰富的临床医生群体中,关于FABMs的教育和SDM工具使用培训也提高了知识得分。

创新点

这种新型SDM工具可以更好地使临床医生满足患者对FABMs日益增长的兴趣。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be16/10194193/8c1c81523bc9/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验