Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
Innovative and Clinical Research Promotion Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
J Dermatol. 2021 Jul;48(7):993-998. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.15839. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
Vascular anomalies comprise a heterogeneous group of disorders caused by abnormal proliferation or development of vascular and/or lymphatic vessels. Vascular anomalies present with various symptoms and complications, but no standardized methods evaluate their severity, and to measure treatment outcomes is difficult. To assess the responsiveness of measurement scores for evaluating vascular anomaly skin lesions, we conducted a validation study to compare these measurement scores with patients' objective data. In this study, data were collected from treated and untreated patients. Skin lesions were photographed at baseline and after a follow-up period of 3-6 months. The volume of skin lesions, the degree of red or purple coloration, and color tone were measured objectively. Two external dermatologists evaluated patients' photographs and determined scores, which represented criteria for improvements in skin lesions (size and color) and 6-point Physician Global Assessment scores. The correlation between these scores and patients' objective data (lesion volume and color) was assessed to validate the scores. Twenty-three cases of vascular anomaly (seven vascular tumors, five lymphatic malformations, three venous malformations, and eight lymphatic-venous malformations) were examined. Scores for improvements in vascular anomaly skin lesions (size and color) correlated with a change in lesion volume, the degree of red or purple coloration, color tone score, and 6-point Physician Global Assessment score. Our findings suggest that these measurement scores are responsive to changes in vascular anomaly skin lesions after observation.
血管异常是一组由血管和/或淋巴管异常增殖或发育引起的异质性疾病。血管异常表现出各种症状和并发症,但没有标准化的方法来评估其严重程度,并且难以衡量治疗效果。为了评估测量评分评估血管异常皮肤病变的反应能力,我们进行了一项验证研究,将这些测量评分与患者的客观数据进行比较。在这项研究中,从接受治疗和未接受治疗的患者中收集数据。在基线和 3-6 个月的随访期间拍摄皮肤病变的照片。客观测量皮肤病变的体积、红色或紫色着色程度和色调。两位外部皮肤科医生评估患者的照片并确定评分,这些评分代表皮肤病变(大小和颜色)和 6 分医生整体评估评分改善的标准。评估这些评分与患者客观数据(病变体积和颜色)之间的相关性,以验证评分。检查了 23 例血管异常(七种血管肿瘤、五种淋巴管畸形、三种静脉畸形和八种淋巴静脉畸形)。血管异常皮肤病变(大小和颜色)改善的评分与病变体积变化、红色或紫色着色程度、色调评分和 6 分医生整体评估评分相关。我们的发现表明,这些测量评分对观察后血管异常皮肤病变的变化具有反应能力。