Sridharan Sowmya, Gopalakrishnan Ram, Nambi Panchatcharam S, Kumar Suresh, Sethuraman Nandini, Ramasubramanian V
Department of Infectious Disease, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar;25(3):267-272. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23748.
Invasive candidiasis (IC) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). In this study, we aim to analyze the clinical profile, species distribution, and susceptibility pattern of patients with IC. Case records of non-neutropenic patients ≥18 years of age with IC between January 2016 and June 2019 at a tertiary care referral hospital were analyzed. IC was defined as either candidemia or isolation of species from a sterile site (such as CSF; ascitic, pleural, or pericardial fluid; or pus or tissue from an intraoperative sample) in a patient with clinical signs and symptoms of infection. A total of 114 patients were analyzed, out of which 105 (92.1%) patients had bloodstream infection (BSI) due to Candida and 9 (7.9%) had IC identified from a sterile site. Central line-associated blood stream infection (27 patients, 23.6%) and a gastrointestinal source (30 patients, 26.3%) were the most common presumed sources for candidemia. The commonest species was 42 (36.8%), followed by 20 (17.5%). Serum beta-D-glucan (BDG) was done only in 32 patients of the 114 (35.3%); among those who were tested, 5 (15.6%) had a BDG value of less than 80 pg/mL despite having Candida BSI. Fluconazole sensitivity was 69.5% overall. At 14 days after diagnosis of IC, 49.1% had recovered, with the remainder having an unfavorable outcome (32.4% had died and 18.4% had left against medical advice). IC is a major concern in Indian ICUs, with a satisfactory outcome in only half of our patients. Serum BDG is a valuable test to diagnose blood culture-negative IC, but more studies are needed to determine its role in the exclusion of IC, as we had a small minority of patients with negative tests despite proven IC. We recommend sending two sets of blood cultures and serum BDG assay for all suspected patients. Initiating empiric antifungal therapy with an echinocandin is advisable, in view of increasing azole resistance and the emergence of , with de-escalation to fluconazole for sensitive isolates after clinical stability and blood culture clearance. Sridharan S, Gopalakrishnan R, Nambi PS, Kumar S, Sethuraman N, Ramasubramanian V. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(3):267-272.
侵袭性念珠菌病(IC)是重症监护病房(ICU)中危重症患者发病和死亡的主要原因。在本研究中,我们旨在分析IC患者的临床特征、菌种分布及药敏模式。分析了2016年1月至2019年6月在一家三级转诊医院确诊为IC的≥18岁非中性粒细胞减少患者的病例记录。IC定义为伴有感染临床症状和体征的患者出现念珠菌血症,或从无菌部位(如脑脊液、腹水、胸水或心包积液,或术中样本的脓液或组织)分离出念珠菌属菌种。共分析了114例患者,其中105例(92.1%)因念珠菌导致血流感染(BSI),9例(7.9%)从无菌部位确诊为IC。中心静脉导管相关血流感染(27例,23.6%)和胃肠道来源(30例,26.3%)是念珠菌血症最常见的推测来源。最常见的菌种是白色念珠菌42例(36.8%),其次是热带念珠菌20例(17.5%)。114例患者中仅32例(35.3%)检测了血清β-D-葡聚糖(BDG);在这些检测的患者中,5例(15.6%)尽管患有念珠菌BSI,但BDG值低于80 pg/mL。氟康唑总体敏感性为69.5%。IC诊断后14天,49.1%的患者康复出院,其余患者预后不佳(32.4%死亡,18.4%自动出院)。IC是印度ICU中的一个主要问题,我们的患者中只有一半预后良好。血清BDG是诊断血培养阴性IC的一项有价值的检测,但由于我们有一小部分患者尽管确诊为IC但检测结果为阴性,因此需要更多研究来确定其在排除IC方面的作用。我们建议对所有疑似患者进行两套血培养和血清BDG检测。鉴于唑类耐药性增加和耳念珠菌的出现,开始使用棘白菌素进行经验性抗真菌治疗是可取的,待临床稳定且血培养转阴后,对敏感菌株降阶梯使用氟康唑。斯里达尔an S、戈帕拉克里什南R、南比PS、库马尔S、塞图拉曼N、拉马苏布拉马尼亚姆V。《印度重症医学杂志》2021年;25(3):267 - 272。