Bawazeer Omemh
Medical Physics Department, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, Saudi Arabia.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Mar 24;14:1263-1270. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S298783. eCollection 2021.
To optimize the maintenance of radiation shields, this study aims to analyze annual inspection files to assess the integrity of radiation shields and their associated factors with regard to defects in radiation shields in clinical settings.
A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted at hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The data from annual inspection files of 1019 clinical lead radiation shields were analyzed. The factors of shield shape, unit where a shield is used, shield thickness, short-term use and number of users were examined. In addition to the inspection file analysis, radiation attenuation measurements were obtained for a subset of shields to compare newly purchased shields with older shields. Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher's exact test and a -test.
The results show that the highest percentage of failing shields were found in the emergency unit, fluoroscopy unit and operation room with a failure of approximately 7.14%, 5.61%, and 3.98%, respectively, of these shields. Fluoroscopy and operation room units were statistically significantly associated with shield defects. There was no association between shield damage and shape of shield, shield thickness, short-term use or number of users. Radiation attenuation measurements were similar for new and older shields.
As fluoroscopy units and operating rooms have a higher percentage of damaged shields, it is recommended that the shields employed in these units should be regularly inspected more frequently than once a year. The study highlights that the shields' age, transmission measurements that confirm that the correct shields are purchased according to the required kVp, physical appearance, and cleanliness should be recorded in annual inspection files. This study highlights the need for uniform inspection files of radiation shields across hospitals. National and international organizations may apply these findings to develop appropriate recommendations.
为优化辐射防护屏的维护,本研究旨在分析年度检查文件,以评估临床环境中辐射防护屏的完整性及其与辐射防护屏缺陷相关的因素。
在沙特阿拉伯的医院进行了一项多中心横断面研究。分析了1019个临床铅辐射防护屏的年度检查文件数据。检查了防护屏形状、使用防护屏的科室、防护屏厚度、短期使用情况和使用人数等因素。除了检查文件分析外,还对一部分防护屏进行了辐射衰减测量,以比较新购买的防护屏和旧防护屏。使用Fisher精确检验和t检验进行统计分析。
结果显示,在急诊科、透视室和手术室发现的不合格防护屏比例最高,这些防护屏的故障率分别约为7.14%、5.61%和3.98%。透视室和手术室与防护屏缺陷在统计学上显著相关。防护屏损坏与防护屏形状、防护屏厚度、短期使用情况或使用人数之间没有关联。新防护屏和旧防护屏的辐射衰减测量结果相似。
由于透视室和手术室中损坏的防护屏比例较高,建议这些科室使用的防护屏应比每年一次更频繁地进行定期检查。该研究强调,应在年度检查文件中记录防护屏的使用年限、根据所需千伏峰值确认购买正确防护屏的透射测量结果、外观和清洁度。本研究强调了各医院辐射防护屏统一检查文件的必要性。国家和国际组织可应用这些研究结果制定适当的建议。