Hoffmann Fabian, Moestl Stefan, Wooten Savannah V, Stray-Gundersen Sten, Tomczak Corey R, Tank Jens, Tanaka Hirofumi, Rittweger Jörn, Chilibeck Philip D
German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Cologne, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Cologne, Germany.
Front Physiol. 2021 Mar 15;12:643764. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.643764. eCollection 2021.
There is controversy whether a lifetime of heavy resistance training, providing pressure-overload, is harmful for left ventricular function. We compared left ventricular dimensions and function in elite Masters athletes involved in throwing events (requiring strength; = 21, seven females, 60 ± 14 years) to those involved in endurance events ( = 65, 25 females, 59 ± 10 years) and sprinting ( = 68, 21 females, 57 ± 13 years) at the 2018 World Masters Athletic Championships. Left ventricular dimensions and function were assessed with B-mode ultrasound and Doppler. The ratio of left ventricular early diastolic peak filling velocity to peak velocity during atrial contraction (E/A) across the mitral valve and the ratio of E to velocity of the E-wave (E') across the lateral and septal mitral annulus (E/E') were used as indexes of left ventricular diastolic function. Intra-ventricular septal wall thickness was greater in throwers compared to sprinters (11.9 ± 2.2 vs. 10.3 ± 2.3 mm; = 0.01). Left ventricular end diastolic diameter/body surface area was higher in endurance athletes and sprinters vs. throwers (25.2 ± 3.0, 24.3 ± 3.1, and 22.0 ± 3.1 mm/m, respectively, < 0.01). The E/A was higher in endurance athletes and sprinters vs. throwers (1.35 ± 0.40, 1.37 ± 0.43, and 1.05 ± 0.41, respectively; < 0.01). The E/E' was lower in endurance athletes and sprinters vs. throwers (6.9 ± 1.8, 6.6 ± 1.9, and 8.1 ± 1.9, respectively, < 0.05). Compared to age-matched historical controls ( > 1,000; E/A = 1.06; E/E' = 7.5), left ventricular diastolic function was not different in throwers, but superior in endurance athletes and sprinters ( < 0.01). Masters throwers have altered left ventricular dimensions and function vs. other athletes, but a lifetime of heavy resistance training does not appear to alter left ventricular function compared to age-matched controls.
终生进行高强度抗阻训练(提供压力过载)是否对左心室功能有害存在争议。我们在2018年世界大师田径锦标赛上,比较了参加投掷项目(需要力量;n = 21,7名女性,60±14岁)的精英大师运动员与参加耐力项目(n = 65,25名女性,59±10岁)和短跑项目(n = 68,21名女性,57±13岁)的运动员的左心室尺寸和功能。用B型超声和多普勒评估左心室尺寸和功能。二尖瓣处左心室舒张早期峰值充盈速度与心房收缩期峰值速度之比(E/A)以及二尖瓣外侧和间隔环处E波速度与E之比(E/E')被用作左心室舒张功能指标。与短跑运动员相比,投掷运动员的室间隔壁厚度更大(11.9±2.2对10.3±2.3毫米;P = 0.01)。耐力运动员和短跑运动员的左心室舒张末期直径/体表面积高于投掷运动员(分别为25.2±3.0、24.3±3.1和22.0±3.1毫米/平方米,P < 0.01)。耐力运动员和短跑运动员的E/A高于投掷运动员(分别为1.35±0.40、1.37±0.43和1.05±0.41;P < 0.01)。耐力运动员和短跑运动员的E/E'低于投掷运动员(分别为6.9±1.8、6.6±1.9和8.1±1.9,P < 0.05)。与年龄匹配的历史对照组(n > 1000;E/A = 1.06;E/E' = 7.5)相比,投掷运动员的左心室舒张功能无差异,但耐力运动员和短跑运动员的左心室舒张功能更优(P < 0.01)。与其他运动员相比,大师级投掷运动员的左心室尺寸和功能有所改变,但与年龄匹配的对照组相比,终生高强度抗阻训练似乎并未改变左心室功能。