Benali Taoufiq, Habbadi Khaoula, Bouyahya Abdelhakim, Khabbach Abdelmajid, Marmouzi Ilias, Aanniz Tarik, Chtibi Houda, Mrabti Hanae Naceiri, Achbani El Hassan, Hammani Khalil
Environment and Health Team, Polydisciplinary Faculty of Safi, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakesh, Morocco.
Laboratory of Natural Resources and Environment, Polydisciplinary Faculty of Taza, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, B.P.: 1223, Taza-Gare, Taza, Morocco.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021 Mar 13;2021:6641720. doi: 10.1155/2021/6641720. eCollection 2021.
The protection of agricultural crops and the preservation of the organoleptic and health qualities of food products represent a major challenge for the agricultural and agro-food industries. Essential oils have received greater attention as alternatives to replace the control strategies based on pesticides against phytopathogenic bacteria and synthetic compounds in food preservation. The aims of this work were to study the chemical composition of subsp. and essential oils and to examine their antioxidant and antimicrobial effects. To carry out this work, the chemical composition of the essential oil was determined using gas chromatography (GC) with the detection feature of mass spectrometry (MS). Subsequently, the antioxidant activity was investigated by DPPH and FRAPS assays. The antimicrobial effect was studied against phytopathogenic and foodborne pathogenic bacteria using the disc and the microdilution methods. Our results showed that GC-MS analysis of EOs allowed the identification of 30 compounds in EO (TPpEO), while 5 compounds were identified in EO (MGEO). TPpEO had as major compounds -pinene (19.82%) and germacrene D (18.33%), while geranial (36.93%) and z-citral (18.25%) were the main components of MGEO. The most potent activity was obtained from MGEO (IC = 189.7 ± 2.62 g/mL) compared to TPpEO (IC = 208.33 ± 3.51 g/mL. For the FRAP test, the highest reducing power was obtained from 1.32 ± 0.1 mg AAE/g of TPpEO compared to MGEO 0.51 ± 0.13 mg AAE/g of EO. Both EOs exhibited varying degrees of antibacterial activities against all the tested strains with inhibition zones in the range of 9.33 ± 0.57 mm to >65 mm and MIC values from 0.19 to 12.5 mg/mL. However, MGEO exhibits an interesting anticandidal effect with inhibition zone 44.33 ± 0.57 mm. The findings of this research establish the riches of EOs on volatile compounds, their important antioxidant activity, and their antimicrobial effect against the bacteria tested.
保护农作物以及保持食品的感官和健康品质是农业和农产品加工业面临的一项重大挑战。作为替代基于农药防治植物病原菌和食品保鲜中合成化合物的控制策略,精油受到了更多关注。这项工作的目的是研究亚种和精油的化学成分,并考察它们的抗氧化和抗菌作用。为开展这项工作,采用具有质谱检测功能的气相色谱法(GC)测定精油的化学成分。随后,通过DPPH和FRAPS试验研究抗氧化活性。使用纸片法和微量稀释法研究对植物病原菌和食源病原菌的抗菌作用。我们的结果表明,GC-MS分析精油可鉴定出TPpEO精油中的30种化合物,而MGEO精油中鉴定出5种化合物。TPpEO的主要化合物是α-蒎烯(19.82%)和吉马烯D(18.33%),而香叶醛(36.93%)和Z-柠檬醛(18.25%)是MGEO的主要成分。与TPpEO(IC₅₀ = 208.33 ± 3.51 μg/mL)相比,MGEO表现出最强的活性(IC₅₀ = 189.7 ± 2.62 μg/mL)。对于FRAP试验,TPpEO的还原力最高,为1.32 ± 0.1 mg AAE/g,而MGEO精油为0.51 ± 0.13 mg AAE/g。两种精油对所有测试菌株均表现出不同程度的抗菌活性,抑菌圈范围为9.33 ± 0.57 mm至>65 mm,MIC值为0.19至12.5 mg/mL。然而,MGEO表现出有趣的抗念珠菌作用,抑菌圈为44.33 ± 0.57 mm。本研究结果证实了精油在挥发性化合物方面的丰富性、其重要的抗氧化活性以及对测试细菌的抗菌作用。