• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阴道镜检查后女性的健康相关生活质量:一项纵向患者调查结果。

Health-related quality of life in women after colposcopy: results from a longitudinal patient survey.

机构信息

School of Public Health, University College Cork, 4th Floor, Western Gateway Building, Western Road, Cork, Ireland.

National Cancer Registry Ireland, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2021 Sep;30(9):2509-2520. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02831-3. Epub 2021 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-021-02831-3
PMID:33792833
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Information concerning the health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) consequences of colposcopy is limited, particularly over time. In a longitudinal study, we investigated women's HRQoL at 4, 8 and 12 months post colposcopy and the factors associated with this.

METHODS

Women attending colposcopy at two large hospitals affiliated with the national screening programme in Ireland were invited to complete questionnaires at 4, 8 and 12 months post colposcopy. HRQoL was measured using the EQ-5D-3L and compared across a range of socio-demographic, clinical and attitudinal variables. A mixed-effects logistic multivariable model was employed to investigate associations between these variables and low HRQoL.

RESULTS

Of 584 women initially recruited, 429, 343 and 303 completed questionnaires at 4, 8 and 12 months, respectively. The mean overall HRQoL score for the sample across all time points was 0.90 (SD 0.16). Approximately 18% of women experienced low HRQoL at each of the three time points. In multivariable testing, over the entire 12-month follow-up period, non-Irish nationals (OR 8.99, 95% CI 2.35-34.43) and women with high-grade referral cytology (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.08-7.13) were at higher odds of low HRQoL. Women who were past (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07-0.58) or never (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.16-1.12) smokers were at lower odds of low HRQoL than current smokers. As women's satisfaction with their healthcare increased their odds of experiencing low HRQoL fell (OR per unit increase 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Women's HRQoL did not change over the 12 months post colposcopy, but some subgroups of women were at higher risk of experiencing low HRQoL. These subgroups may benefit from additional support.

摘要

背景

有关阴道镜检查对健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)影响的信息有限,特别是随着时间的推移。在一项纵向研究中,我们调查了女性阴道镜检查后 4、8 和 12 个月的 HRQoL 及其相关因素。

方法

在爱尔兰国家筛查计划下的两家大医院接受阴道镜检查的女性被邀请在阴道镜检查后 4、8 和 12 个月填写问卷。使用 EQ-5D-3L 测量 HRQoL,并与一系列社会人口统计学、临床和态度变量进行比较。采用混合效应逻辑多变量模型调查这些变量与低 HRQoL 之间的关联。

结果

在最初招募的 584 名女性中,429 名、343 名和 303 名分别在 4、8 和 12 个月时完成了问卷。样本在所有时间点的总体 HRQoL 平均得分为 0.90(SD 0.16)。大约 18%的女性在三个时间点都经历了低 HRQoL。在多变量测试中,在整个 12 个月的随访期间,非爱尔兰国民(OR 8.99,95%CI 2.35-34.43)和高级转诊细胞学(OR 2.78,95%CI 1.08-7.13)的女性发生低 HRQoL 的可能性更高。过去(OR 0.20,95%CI 0.07-0.58)或从未(OR 0.42,95%CI 0.16-1.12)吸烟的女性发生低 HRQoL 的可能性低于当前吸烟者。随着女性对医疗保健的满意度增加,她们经历低 HRQoL 的可能性降低(OR 每单位增加 0.51,95%CI 0.34-0.75)。

结论

女性的 HRQoL 在阴道镜检查后 12 个月内没有变化,但某些亚组女性发生低 HRQoL 的风险更高。这些亚组可能需要额外的支持。

相似文献

1
Health-related quality of life in women after colposcopy: results from a longitudinal patient survey.阴道镜检查后女性的健康相关生活质量:一项纵向患者调查结果。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Sep;30(9):2509-2520. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02831-3. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
2
Trends in, and predictors of, anxiety and specific worries following colposcopy: a 12-month longitudinal study.阴道镜检查后焦虑及特定担忧的趋势和预测因素:一项为期12个月的纵向研究。
Psychooncology. 2016 May;25(5):597-604. doi: 10.1002/pon.3980. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
3
4
How distressing is referral to colposcopy in cervical cancer screening?: a prospective quality of life study.在宫颈癌筛查中转诊行阴道镜检查有多令人痛苦?一项前瞻性生活质量研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jan;132(1):142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
5
Who defaults from colposcopy? A multi-centre, population-based, prospective cohort study of predictors of non-attendance for follow-up among women with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology.哪些人会从阴道镜检查中失约?一项多中心、基于人群、前瞻性队列研究,旨在预测低级别宫颈细胞学异常女性在随访中不按时就诊的预测因素。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Dec;165(2):318-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
6
Health-related quality of life and perception of anxiety in women with abnormal cervical cytology referred for colposcopy: an observational study.异常宫颈细胞学转诊行阴道镜检查的妇女的健康相关生活质量和焦虑感知:一项观察性研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Jul;169(2):387-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.03.033. Epub 2013 May 1.
7
Physical after-effects of colposcopy and related procedures, and their inter-relationship with psychological distress: a longitudinal survey.阴道镜检查及相关操作的身体后遗症及其与心理困扰的相互关系:一项纵向调查。
BJOG. 2017 Aug;124(9):1402-1410. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14671. Epub 2017 May 31.
8
Psychological effects of concurrent cytology and colposcopy testing in women referred to cancer counseling outpatient clinic in Belgrade.在贝尔格莱德癌症咨询门诊就诊的女性中,同时进行细胞学和阴道镜检查的心理影响。
J BUON. 2017 Jan-Feb;22(1):214-223.
9
Health-related quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D in the prevention, screening and management of cervical disease: A systematic review.通过EQ-5D量表测量的与健康相关的生活质量在宫颈疾病预防、筛查及管理中的应用:一项系统综述
Qual Life Res. 2017 Nov;26(11):2885-2897. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1628-z. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
10
Impact of endometriosis on women's health-related quality of life: A national prospective cohort study.子宫内膜异位症对女性健康相关生活质量的影响:一项全国前瞻性队列研究。
Maturitas. 2023 Aug;174:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2023.04.272. Epub 2023 May 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Behaviors and Health-Related Quality of Life Among U.S. Adults Aged 18-64 Years.美国 18-64 岁成年人的健康行为和健康相关生活质量。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Apr;60(4):529-536. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.10.020. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
2
Correlates of non-adherence to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening among screen-eligible women: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada.在有资格接受筛查的女性中,乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查不依从的相关因素:加拿大安大略省的一项基于人群的队列研究。
Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Feb;32(2):147-155. doi: 10.1007/s10552-020-01369-y. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
3
Cost effectiveness analysis of HPV primary screening and dual stain cytology triage compared with cervical cytology.
HPV 初筛与双重染色细胞学分流检测与宫颈细胞学检查比较的成本效果分析。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Mar;30(2):e17. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e17. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
4
Disparities in cervical screening participation: a comparison of Russian, Somali and Kurdish immigrants with the general Finnish population.参与宫颈癌筛查的差异:俄罗斯、索马里和库尔德移民与芬兰普通人群的比较。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 May 4;17(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0768-2.
5
Primary HPV testing versus cytology-based cervical screening in women in Australia vaccinated for HPV and unvaccinated: effectiveness and economic assessment for the National Cervical Screening Program.澳大利亚 HPV 疫苗接种和未接种女性中基于 HPV 的细胞学筛查与初级 HPV 检测的比较:国家宫颈癌筛查计划的有效性和经济评估。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Feb;2(2):e96-e107. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30007-5. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
6
Validation of EQ-5D and 15D in the assessment of health-related quality of life in chronic pain.验证 EQ-5D 和 15D 在慢性疼痛患者健康相关生活质量评估中的作用。
Pain. 2017 Aug;158(8):1577-1585. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000954.
7
Individuals' quality of life linked to major life events, perceived social support, and personality traits.个人的生活质量与重大生活事件、感知到的社会支持和人格特质相关。
Qual Life Res. 2016 Nov;25(11):2897-2908. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1296-4. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
8
Assessing the health of the general population in England: how do the three- and five-level versions of EQ-5D compare?评估英格兰普通人群的健康状况:EQ-5D的三级版本和五级版本对比情况如何?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Oct 21;13:171. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0356-8.
9
Trends in, and predictors of, anxiety and specific worries following colposcopy: a 12-month longitudinal study.阴道镜检查后焦虑及特定担忧的趋势和预测因素:一项为期12个月的纵向研究。
Psychooncology. 2016 May;25(5):597-604. doi: 10.1002/pon.3980. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
10
Impact of post-colposcopy management on women's long-term worries: results from the UK population-based TOMBOLA trial.阴道镜检查后管理对女性长期担忧的影响:基于英国人群的TOMBOLA试验结果
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2016 Jan;42(1):43-51. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2015-101170. Epub 2015 Sep 16.