• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

波兰患者真实生活条件下间歇性扫描连续血糖监测数据:与世界范围数据相比,扫描更频繁,血糖控制更好。

Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data of Polish Patients from Real-Life Conditions: More Scanning and Better Glycemic Control Compared to Worldwide Data.

机构信息

Department of Metabolic Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetology and Nephrology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

出版信息

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Aug;23(8):577-585. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0034. Epub 2021 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1089/dia.2021.0034
PMID:33794101
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8377514/
Abstract

Randomized trials and observational studies have shown that the use of FreeStyle Libre intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring system (isCGMS) is associated with improved glycemic indices and quality of life. In this retrospective, real-world data analysis, we described country-specific glucometrics among isCGMS users from Poland and compared them with international data. The analyzed time period for the Polish data ranged between August 2016 and August 2020, and the analyzed time period for the international data ranged from September 2014 to August 2020. Data from the Polish population were collected from 10,679 readers and 92,627 sensors with 113 million automatically recorded glucose readings. The worldwide database included information from 981,876 readers and 11,179,229 sensors with 13.1 billion glucose readings. On average, the users of isCGMS from Poland performed substantially more scans/day (21.2 ± 14.2 vs. 13.2 ± 10.7), achieved lower eHbA1c (7.0% ± 1.2% vs. 7.5% ± 1.5%), and spent more time-in-range (TIR) (64.2% ± 17.3% vs. 58.1% ± 20.3%) and less time-above-range (TAR) (29.7% ± 18.0% vs. 36.6% ± 21.3%) ( < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Moreover, they were more likely to achieve TIR >70% (36.3% vs. 28.8%), but spent more time-below-range (TBR) (4.7% vs. 3.6%). Our results confirmed that analyzed glucometrics improve as the scan rate frequency increases. However, at a similar scanning frequency to the comparative group, users from Poland achieved lower eHbA1c, higher TIR, and lower TAR, but higher TBR. We report more scanning and better glycemic control in isCGMS users in Poland than worldwide. The cause of this observation remains unknown. Our data also show that in real-life practice, a large number of patients may be willing to perform scanning more frequently than it is usually assumed.

摘要

随机试验和观察性研究表明,使用 FreeStyle Libre 间歇性扫描连续血糖监测系统(isCGMS)与改善血糖指标和生活质量有关。在这项回顾性、真实世界数据分析中,我们描述了波兰 isCGMS 用户的特定国家血糖指标,并将其与国际数据进行了比较。波兰数据的分析时间段在 2016 年 8 月至 2020 年 8 月之间,国际数据的分析时间段在 2014 年 9 月至 2020 年 8 月之间。波兰人群的数据来自 10,679 个阅读器和 92,627 个传感器,共记录了 1.13 亿次自动血糖读数。全球数据库包括来自 981,876 个阅读器和 11,179,229 个传感器的信息,记录了 131 亿次血糖读数。平均而言,波兰 isCGMS 用户每天进行的扫描次数明显更多(21.2 ± 14.2 次 vs. 13.2 ± 10.7 次),实现的 eHbA1c 更低(7.0% ± 1.2% vs. 7.5% ± 1.5%),TIR 时间更长(64.2% ± 17.3% vs. 58.1% ± 20.3%),TAR 时间更短(29.7% ± 18.0% vs. 36.6% ± 21.3%)(所有比较均<0.0001)。此外,他们更有可能实现 TIR >70%(36.3% vs. 28.8%),但 TBR 时间更长(4.7% vs. 3.6%)。我们的结果证实,随着扫描频率的增加,分析后的血糖指标会得到改善。然而,在与对照组相似的扫描频率下,波兰的使用者实现了更低的 eHbA1c、更高的 TIR 和更低的 TAR,但 TBR 更高。我们报告了波兰的 isCGMS 用户比全球范围内进行了更多的扫描和更好的血糖控制。这种观察结果的原因尚不清楚。我们的数据还表明,在实际实践中,大量患者可能愿意比通常假设的更频繁地进行扫描。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4607/8377514/3f8236886bbe/dia.2021.0034_figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4607/8377514/594b98ffc67e/dia.2021.0034_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4607/8377514/3f8236886bbe/dia.2021.0034_figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4607/8377514/594b98ffc67e/dia.2021.0034_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4607/8377514/3f8236886bbe/dia.2021.0034_figure2.jpg

相似文献

1
Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data of Polish Patients from Real-Life Conditions: More Scanning and Better Glycemic Control Compared to Worldwide Data.波兰患者真实生活条件下间歇性扫描连续血糖监测数据:与世界范围数据相比,扫描更频繁,血糖控制更好。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Aug;23(8):577-585. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0034. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
2
Flash Glucose Monitoring in Croatia: The Optimal Number of Scans per Day to Achieve Good Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetes.克罗地亚的瞬感血糖监测:1 型糖尿病患者达到良好血糖控制的最佳每日扫描次数。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Oct 25;59(11):1893. doi: 10.3390/medicina59111893.
3
Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: Comparison of Holidays Schooldays.1 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制:假期与上学日的比较。
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2024;20(9):e040124225257. doi: 10.2174/0115733998276061231117101716.
4
Real-life 24-week changes in glycemic parameters among European users of flash glucose monitoring with type 1 and 2 diabetes and different levels of glycemic control.现实生活中,1 型和 2 型糖尿病及不同血糖控制水平的欧洲闪光血糖监测使用者血糖参数的 24 周变化。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023 Jul;201:110735. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110735. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
5
Effects of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Metrics of Glycemic Control in Diabetes: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.连续血糖监测对糖尿病血糖控制指标的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Care. 2020 May;43(5):1146-1156. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1459.
6
Predictors of use and improvement in glycemic indices after initiating continuous glucose monitoring in real world: Data from Saudi Arabia.现实世界中启动持续血糖监测后血糖指数使用及改善的预测因素:来自沙特阿拉伯的数据。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2022 Feb;16(2):102416. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2022.102416. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
7
Flash Glucose Monitoring in Israel: Understanding Real-World Associations between Self-Monitoring Frequency and Metrics of Glycemic Control.以色列的动态血糖监测:了解自我监测频率与血糖控制指标之间的真实关联。
Endocr Pract. 2022 May;28(5):472-478. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2022.02.004. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
8
Benefits of a Switch from Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring (isCGM) to Real-Time (rt) CGM in Diabetes Type 1 Suboptimal Controlled Patients in Real-Life: A One-Year Prospective Study .从间歇性扫描连续血糖监测(isCGM)切换至实时(rt)CGM 对 1 型糖尿病控制不佳患者的现实获益:一项为期一年的前瞻性研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Sep 13;21(18):6131. doi: 10.3390/s21186131.
9
Excellence in the management of Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems: Lessons from the Polish cohort.高级混合闭环系统管理的卓越表现:波兰队列的经验教训。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2024 Oct;216:111832. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111832. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
10
Impact of Switching from Intermittently Scanned to Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in a Type 1 Diabetes Patient French Cohort: An Observational Study of Clinical Practices.从间歇性扫描到实时连续血糖监测系统切换对 1 型糖尿病患者的影响:法国队列的观察性研究。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Apr;23(4):259-267. doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0515. Epub 2020 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
The efficacy of intermittent scanning continuous glucose monitoring in the elderly: A case-control study.间歇性扫描式连续血糖监测在老年人中的疗效:一项病例对照研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jul;27(7):3882-3890. doi: 10.1111/dom.16417. Epub 2025 May 13.
2
Impact of the initiation of isCGM soon after type 1 diabetes mellitus diagnosis in adults on glycemic indices and fear of hypoglycemia: a randomized controlled trial.成人1型糖尿病确诊后不久开始使用实时连续葡萄糖监测对血糖指标及低血糖恐惧的影响:一项随机对照试验
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 9;15:1503891. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1503891. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Time in Range in Relation to All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Study.时间在范围内与 2 型糖尿病患者的全因和心血管死亡率的关系:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Feb;44(2):549-555. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1862. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
2
Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in Poland in 2005-2014: results of the WOBASZ surveys.2005-2014 年波兰糖尿病和空腹血糖受损的流行情况:WOBASZ 调查结果。
Diabet Med. 2020 Sep;37(9):1528-1535. doi: 10.1111/dme.14333. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
3
International benchmarking in type 1 diabetes: Large difference in childhood HbA1c between eight high-income countries but similar rise during adolescence-A quality registry study.
7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.
7. 糖尿病技术:2025年糖尿病照护标准
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan 1;48(Supplement_1):S146-S166. doi: 10.2337/dc25-S007.
4
Predictors of the effectiveness of isCGM usage in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus: post-hoc analysis of the ISCHIA study.1型糖尿病成年患者使用实时连续葡萄糖监测的有效性预测因素:ISCHIA研究的事后分析
Diabetol Int. 2024 Feb 15;15(3):400-405. doi: 10.1007/s13340-023-00683-5. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Association of scan frequency with CGM-derived metrics and influential factors in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus.扫描频率与1型糖尿病成年患者的连续血糖监测衍生指标及影响因素的关联
Diabetol Int. 2023 Sep 12;15(1):109-116. doi: 10.1007/s13340-023-00655-9. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.7. 糖尿病技术:2024年糖尿病护理标准
Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(Suppl 1):S126-S144. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S007.
7
Ambulatory Glucose Profile Changes During Pregnancy in Women With Type 1 Diabetes Using Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Empowered by Personalized Education.采用个性化教育赋能的间歇性扫描式动态血糖监测技术,1型糖尿病女性孕期动态血糖变化情况
Diabetes Spectr. 2023 Fall;36(4):373-378. doi: 10.2337/ds22-0094. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
8
Flash Glucose Monitoring in Croatia: The Optimal Number of Scans per Day to Achieve Good Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetes.克罗地亚的瞬感血糖监测:1 型糖尿病患者达到良好血糖控制的最佳每日扫描次数。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Oct 25;59(11):1893. doi: 10.3390/medicina59111893.
9
Scans per day as predictors of optimal glycemic control in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus using flash glucose monitoring: what number of scans per day should raise a red flag?每天扫描次数可预测使用瞬感葡萄糖监测的 1 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制情况:每天应扫描多少次以引起警惕?
Acta Diabetol. 2024 Mar;61(3):343-350. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02204-x. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
10
Identification of Sociodemographic and Clinical Factors Influencing the Feeling of Stigmatization in People with Type 1 Diabetes.识别影响1型糖尿病患者耻辱感的社会人口学和临床因素。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 2;11(15):2185. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11152185.
国际 1 型糖尿病基准测试:8 个高收入国家儿童 HbA1c 存在较大差异,但青春期升高幅度相似——一项质量登记研究。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2020 Jun;21(4):621-627. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13014. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
4
Flash glucose monitoring reduces glycemic variability and hypoglycemia: real-world data from Spain.实时血糖监测可降低血糖变异性和低血糖风险:来自西班牙的真实世界数据。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Mar;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001052.
5
Real-world flash glucose monitoring in Brazil: can sensors make a difference in diabetes management in developing countries?巴西的真实世界动态血糖监测:传感器能否在发展中国家的糖尿病管理中发挥作用?
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2020 Jan 7;12:3. doi: 10.1186/s13098-019-0513-z. eCollection 2020.
6
7. Diabetes Technology: .7. 糖尿病技术:。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S77-S88. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S007.
7
Quality of Life and Glucose Control After 1 Year of Nationwide Reimbursement of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults Living With Type 1 Diabetes (FUTURE): A Prospective Observational Real-World Cohort Study.1 型糖尿病患者接受间歇性扫描连续血糖监测 1 年后的生活质量和血糖控制(FUTURE):一项前瞻性观察性真实世界队列研究。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Feb;43(2):389-397. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1610. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
8
Advances in technology for management of type 1 diabetes.1 型糖尿病管理技术的进展。
Lancet. 2019 Oct 5;394(10205):1265-1273. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31142-0. Epub 2019 Sep 15.
9
Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9 edition.2019 年全球及各区域糖尿病患病率估算值及 2030 年和 2045 年预测值:国际糖尿病联盟糖尿病地图集(第 9 版)的结果。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;157:107843. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
10
Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range.临床连续血糖监测数据解读目标:时间范围国际共识推荐意见。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Aug;42(8):1593-1603. doi: 10.2337/dci19-0028. Epub 2019 Jun 8.