Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug, and Child's Health (NEUROFARBA), Section of Psychology, University of Florence, 50100 Florence, Italy.
Department of Health Sciences, Psychology Unit, University of Florence, 50100 Florence, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 14;18(6):2979. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062979.
The Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale (BFAS) is widely used, but psychometric evidence by applying Item Response Theory (IRT) is lacking. Considering the advantages of this psychometric approach, the aim of study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the BFAS among adolescents and young adults. Participants were 1134 (50% males, Mean age = 20.7, SD = 3.5, range = 14-33 years) Italian high school students and undergraduates. The unidimensionality of the scale was confirmed (/df = 2.8, = 0.99, = 0.98, and = 0.04 [ = 0.02-0.06]) and IRT analysis showed that the scale assesses medium and high levels of the trait, and that it is useful in order to discriminate different levels of Problematic Facebook use (PFU) within this range of trait, in which the scale is sufficiently informative. The relationships of BFAS scores with theoretically related constructs provided support to the validity of the scale. In accordance with previous studies, BFAS scores were positively correlated with Problematic Internet use and problematic Social Network use, negatively correlated with self-esteem, and positively related to loneliness. The Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analysis showed that BFAS is invariant across gender, and only one item had uniform and small-in-size DIF. Additionally, we tested age invariance. Since only 17% of the BFAS items were non-invariant, we determined that the BFAS exhibited minor non-invariance as a whole. An analysis of the adequacy of the polythetic and monothetic criteria to define the range of the trait indicative of problematic use was also conducted. Overall, this study offers evidence that BFAS is a valuable and useful scale for measuring high levels of PFU among Italian adolescents and young adults.
卑尔根 Facebook 成瘾量表 (BFAS) 应用广泛,但缺乏应用项目反应理论 (IRT) 的心理测量学证据。考虑到这种心理测量方法的优势,本研究旨在调查 BFAS 的意大利版本在青少年和年轻成年人中的心理测量特性。参与者为 1134 名(50%为男性,平均年龄=20.7,标准差=3.5,范围为 14-33 岁)意大利高中生和本科生。该量表的单维性得到了证实(/df = 2.8, = 0.99, = 0.98, = 0.04 [ = 0.02-0.06]),IRT 分析表明该量表评估中等和高水平的特质,并且在该特质范围内评估不同程度的 Facebook 使用问题(PFU)非常有用,在这个范围内,量表具有足够的信息。BFAS 得分与理论上相关的构念的关系为量表的有效性提供了支持。与先前的研究一致,BFAS 得分与问题性互联网使用和问题性社交网络使用呈正相关,与自尊呈负相关,与孤独感呈正相关。差异项目功能 (DIF) 分析表明,BFAS 在性别上是不变的,只有一个项目具有一致的和小的 DIF。此外,我们还测试了年龄不变性。由于只有 17%的 BFAS 项目存在非不变性,因此我们确定 BFAS 整体上存在较小的非不变性。还对多质和单质标准来定义指示问题使用的特质范围的充分性进行了分析。总的来说,这项研究提供了证据表明 BFAS 是一种有价值和有用的量表,可以衡量意大利青少年和年轻成年人中高水平的 PFU。